Originally posted by Deano
you bore me with your posts. ive heard it all before.
Just admit that you are afraid to acknowledge that I posted the truth about you and that you are embarrassed. By posting these glib retorts you are saying as much.
Originally posted by Deano
well no. my post was on topic. kharadogs post was not. it was to attack me only
My posts are totally on topic.They call into question all the theories and facts that you have posted.
Originally posted by DeanoThe human psyche interests me as much as the human physiology. I think the topic of what makes you create these threads is far more conversation worthy than the actual topic of the threads you create. So what is the point of this thread exactly Deano?
well no. my post was on topic. kharadogs post was not. it was to attack me onlyu still here?
Originally posted by KharmaDog
Just admit that you are afraid to acknowledge that I posted the truth about you and that you are embarrassed. By posting these glib retorts you are saying as much.My posts are totally on topic.They call into question all the theories and facts that you have posted.
u dont post the truth. you only think it is the truth. its your opinion. you see the world differently to me. thats fine.
all you are doing with your posts is trying to get one over on me by bringing up things that are not on topic. admit it
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
The human psyche interests me as much as the human physiology. I think the topic of what makes you create these threads is far more conversation worthy than the actual topic of the threads you create. So what is the point of this thread exactly Deano?
i think you should examine yourself and why you say the things you say before you start on anyone else
ask yourself 'what is the point of me being in this thread' 'am i being grown up or acting childishly' etc
whats the point of any thread you say? whatever you think it is
Originally posted by DeanoInteresting, more vague glib cliche. My question was directed at you and what you thought the point of you making this thread was. It's a relatively simple question.
i think you should examine yourself and why you say the things you say before you start on anyone elseask yourself 'what is the point of me being in this thread' 'am i being grown up or acting childishly' etc
whats the point of any thread you say? whatever you think it is
And evasion of that simple question with a question, I'm quite familiar with myself thanks. The answer to your question is pretty much summed up in the above. You're a curiosity. And I, as a scientist, am by nature inquisitive.
For example this statement:
"u dont post the truth. you only think it is the truth."
Do you actually not see the inherent hypocrisy when this is read in the context of your posting history or that scrolling line in your signature? Or do you just choose to ignore it? Curiouser and curiouser.
Originally posted by Deano
we can all post opinions. you all know mine. kidrock i dont know how people can take you seriously with a comment like 'canada..americas attic''get lost
Originally posted by Deano
ive seemed to have upset you. you know where the door is.most people dont want to discuss. only insult. its quite obvious.
stay on topic, or leave
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Interesting, more vague glib cliche. My question was directed at you and what you thought the point of you making this thread was. It's a relatively simple question.And evasion of that simple question with a question, I'm quite familiar with myself thanks. The answer to your question is pretty much summed up in the above. You're a curiosity. And I, as a scientist, am by nature inquisitive.
For example this statement:
"u dont post the truth. you only think it is the truth."
Do you actually not see the inherent hypocrisy when this is read in the context of your posting history or that scrolling line in your signature? Or do you just choose to ignore it? Curiouser and curiouser.
ask sensible questions and i'll answer them.
its obvious through my eyes that you are not familiar with yourself, as you label yourself a scientist, a close minded one at that. and you think you can judge others because of what you do. i mean, obviously scientists are the only ones who can be inquisitive. what you believe, and how you perceive yourself, is holding you in servitude.
my signature is relevent to me because it is seen through my eyes. its not hypocrisy because i believe it to be truth.
So because you believe it to be the truth it is the truth, therefore you may purport it as "truth". Conversely while others may believe a different truth, when they purport it as such they are to be confronted with:
Originally posted by Deano
u dont post the truth. you only think it is the truth.
"I believe my questions to be sensible." Under your philosophy, of I believe it is therefore it is - I do believe you're obligated to answer them, or renege on your previous statement. Oh, wait a minute. It goes Deano believes it is, therefore it is. Silly me.
"and you think you can judge others because of what you do"
As opposed to judging others based on nothing at all, the latter being much better I take it.
"its obvious through my eyes that you are not familiar with yourself"
"what you believe, and how you perceive yourself, is holding you in servitude."
I really think you should take all these little statements and put them in a book of Deanoisms. It'd sell like hotcakes. Deepak Chopra has nothing on you.
Originally posted by Deano
all that is covered, and explained very easilly.example
The Illuminati structure is one of pyramids within bigger pyramids within still bigger pyramids until you reach the one that encompasses all the others. It is like Russian dolls, one inside the other.
Look at any organisation today, a bank, business, university, government, whatever, and you will see that it is structured as a compartmentalised pyramid. The person who sits behind the counter in a bank will not know what their branch manager is deciding or planning, and the manager, in turn, will not know what is happening at regional level, and they will not know what is being planned at national level, and on it goes.
The only people who know the true plans and agenda of that bank are the handful at the top of the pyramid who know how all the innocent, individual, contributions by people employed by the bank fit together. The overwhelming majority of employees, including those in agencies like the CIA and FBI, have no idea what the big picture is because they are compartmentalised from what is going on elsewhere at their own level, let alone at higher and higher levels.
What can seem matter of fact and innocent to an individual within the pyramid can be very much more sinister when put together with everyone else's compartmentalised contributions.
A "bank" pyramid, for instance, is encompassed by bigger pyramids until you have one that includes the whole global banking system and at the top of that are a handful of interbreeding families going back to the far ancient world who pull the strings of global finance to suit and manipulate their own agenda.
It is the same with governments, transnational corporations, the global media empires, the secret society network, national "security" agencies like the CIA, and so on. They are each compartmentalised on a "need to know" basis and imprisoned by bigger pyramids and at these higher levels these apparently unconnected institutions, businesses, and agencies are all the SAME organisation controlled by the SAME people.
This Illuminati structure of compartmentalised pyramids allows them to organise horrendous attacks like those in New York and Washington while those who actually hi-jacked the planes have no idea who the ultimate "Mr. Big" really is. For instance, the CIA (a mere tool and often fall guy for higher agencies) provided money and other support to the Afghan rebels and terrorist networks that eventually became the Taliban during the Soviet Union invasion.
But the money and support was channelled through Pakistan and elsewhere and while some in Afghanistan would have known where it was coming from, the vast majority would not have known the true source, nor the nature of the global game in which they were being used as mere pawns.
The Illuminati don't control everyone or even nearly everyone in these various organisations, they control those who control the organisation. It is through these few key positions of decision-making that everyone else in the organisation, the pyramid, is told what they will and will not do. It does not take many people to control the actions and policy of an organisation, whatever it may be, if you control the key decision-making positions.
So in terms of the atrocities in the United States, let's start with those who actually hi-jacked the planes. These could have been directly mind-controlled and programmed to do it, or they could have genuinely believed they were serving their religion. Probably a combination of the two. It matters not to the Illuminati, it is the outcome they are interested in.
The hi-jackers would have answered to a network or what they believed were the actual organisers. But from that point they would have lost track of the power game that was playing them like a violin. Who controlled what the hi-jackers believed was their support and organisational network? They have no idea.
The Illuminati do not represent a "side" or a "faction". They CREATE the "sides" and the "factions" and they use them to manipulate the game of divide and rule and centralisation of global power. They operate within the Islamic world as they operate within the "western world".
So as the bigger pyramids envelope the smaller pyramids you reach a point in the structure where the same force is manipulating and organising the horrors in America while also manipulating and organising the RESPONSE to those horrors through their puppets such as Bush, Cheney, Powell, and Blair.
This is how they can work their problem-reaction-solution scams. One of their strands creates the problem (in this case the U.S. atrocities) another strand (the media) tells the people the Illuminati version of the problem (98% of journalists do this unknowingly), and yet another strand offers the "solutions" to the problem, "solutions" which advance their global agenda (in this case a massive erosion of freedoms to "fight terrorism"😉.
You could look at a structure something like this. There will be other elements involved, but it will give you an idea of what I am describing.
an interesting but otherwise spurious analogy because unlike a band...a military demolitions expert who is told to go and covertly plant explosives in a building that is occupied...in the middle of a city in his own country...is going to have quite a major clue as to what he is doing....
thus there is going to be someone...somewhere along the line...who is going to come out and say..."my superiors told me to plant bombs...fly planes...whatever....unless ALL of those people are involved in the conspiracy....
the links in the chain are always their...someone has to tell someone else....so unless they are all in on the big conspiracy and are privvy to the reasons behind it...then someone is going to question it
and please dont give me the old "lives threatened" response because it has happened in many instances before and actually doesn't stop people from speaking out...mordechai vanunu...Aung San Suu Kyi...nelson mandella...history is litered with people who stood up against their governments and were threatened for it
and when the conrpiracy is so all encompassing with so many of the people from the lower echelons of your pyramid systems needed to actually carry out the dirty work....then the outcome is inevitable that it would be found out and someone would have spoken out
yet noone has
Originally posted by Deano
kidrock is righthere is bin laden from the video
even tho in fact he looks like this
''what fools these sheep are'' kidrock says...right again
yeah...and one pic was taken in the early 90's and the other in mid 2000's...so between 10 and 15 years of a difference...not to mention that he has chronic kidney problems...and has been living is a cave (or a council house in the midlands more likely)
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Once again: The moment you think you are privy to the plot, or the moment you think you "figured it out", that's when you become a party to the conspiracy.
thats my point...and given that there are potentially thousands of american citizens who are supposedly involved in a conspiracy to kill thousands of their own countrymen (according to some of the conspiracy theorists) yet no-one them disagreed with it and they all went along with it and managed to keep it a secret
thats absolutely astounding...it really is
Originally posted by jaden101This here picture was taken 27th December 2001, and he looks even more different here. 😐
yeah...and one pic was taken in the early 90's and the other in mid 2000's...so between 10 and 15 years of a difference...not to mention that he has chronic kidney problems...and has been living is a cave (or a council house in the midlands more likely)