Which is more severe...

The killing of 50,000 3 month old human fetuses or the killing of 50,000 dogs?

Originally posted by Mr Ed
The killing of 50,000 3 month old human fetuses or the killing of 50,000 dogs?

That is a hard question. Murder is wrong, but killing depends on intent to determine rather it is right or wrong. Humanly killing dogs because you are trying to saves lives is ok, and killing a fetuses is not considered murder in the US.

Do the women want the fetuses to be killed?

If not that is worse..if yes, then the dogs.

I smell an abortion debate detective
My spidey senses are tingling.

Originally posted by silver_tears
I smell an abortion debate detective
My spidey senses are tingling.

I believe you are right.

Almost always 😖mart:

💃 HORAY VEILED DUPLICATE TOPICS!!! 💃

Originally posted by Mr Ed
The killing of 50,000 3 month old human fetuses or the killing of 50,000 dogs?

next question please

Originally posted by Mr Ed
The killing of 50,000 3 month old human fetuses or the killing of 50,000 dogs?

What's your point in asking a loaded question like this? I assume you're referring to the 50K dogs killed in China in an effort to stop the spread of rabids, but what does that have to do with abortions?

Personnally, they should have mandated that dog owners vaccinate their pets instead of killing the dogs.

Originally posted by Mr Ed
The killing of 50,000 3 month old human fetuses or the killing of 50,000 dogs?

I hate it when they take the curtain out to the track and shoot the horse in the middle of a race just because he broke his leg. Is that what Wilbur did to you when you began botching your lines?

Neither. I hate dogs, and the stray population is sky high. Abortion doesn't concern me, as it's not murder, IMO. It's just a bunch of congregated cells. You're not a human until you're stored in my phone.

Originally posted by Mr Ed
The killing of 50,000 3 month old human fetuses or the killing of 50,000 dogs?

Since fetuses are not alive, you cannot kill them. With that in mind, terminating the existence of 50,000 dogs is worse. Unless you go around forcibly aborting fetuses against the will of the mother, in which case you have a whole different ball game.

The worst would be implanting 50,000 human fetuses inside the 50,000 dogs and seeing what develops...

Originally posted by Gregory
Since fetuses are not alive, you cannot kill them. With that in mind, terminating the existence of 50,000 dogs is worse. Unless you go around forcibly aborting fetuses against the will of the mother, in which case you have a whole different ball game.

Fetuses are not alive? You must be using the word "alive" in a loose way, because something that is not alive cannot die.

Originally posted by Mindship
The worst would be implanting 50,000 human fetuses inside the 50,000 dogs and seeing what develops...

Not really, that might produce interesting scientific data...

Originally posted by Mindship
The worst would be implanting 50,000 human fetuses inside the 50,000 dogs and seeing what develops...

Here is one of the outcomes...

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Fetuses are not alive? You must be using the word "alive" in a loose way, because something that is not alive cannot die.

Uh huh. You may have noticed that I mentioned that very fact in my post. And, in fact, substitued in the phrase "terminate the existence" for "kill."

Originally posted by Bardock42
Not really, that might produce interesting scientific data...

Sci-fi aside, it would produce 50,000 dogs having 50,000 miscarriages.

Originally posted by Gregory
Uh huh. You may have noticed that I mentioned that very fact in my post. And, in fact, substitued in the phrase "terminate the existence" for "kill."

Something that is not alive cannot grow. If a fetus is not alive, then humans do not exist. Humans do exist, therefore fetuses area alive.