Which is more severe...

Started by Robtard4 pages
Originally posted by ILoveMyDaniel
It's hard to explain. Either way, people are going to bash me for it. From my viewpoint, and I AM against abortion, mind you; dogs are "dogs", therefore they are already in life but fetuses are just developing into a "life". I don't know what the feck I'm sayin' but I still say it's equal.

Yes, you confused me, but I will not bash ya for it.

The definition of "Life" is one of the main pro-abortion / anti-abortion controversies.

Originally posted by Gregory
I thought of that, but I'm not sure that I agree with it. You could argue that even a sperm has more potential then a dog, in the sense that sperm + egg --> fetus --> human ... but does that mean that a sperm deserves some sort of special consideration? Most people would probably say not, and that's how I feel about fetuses.

I never give my sperm any consideration... 😛

For the record, there is no pro-life/anti-abortion controversy. There are simply people who understand the issue and knee-jerkers who do not.

I'll go with dogs.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
For the record, there is no pro-life/anti-abortion controversy. There are simply people who understand the issue and knee-jerkers who do not.

I'll go with dogs.

-AC

Did you knee-jerk into that decision?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Did you knee-jerk into that decision?

No, I didn't. Hard to believe isn't it?

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
For the record, there is no pro-life/anti-abortion controversy. There are simply people who understand the issue and knee-jerkers who do not.

I'll go with dogs.

-AC

Sounds like something from The Matrix... Let me guess, you swallowed the red pill?

Re: Which is more severe...

Originally posted by Mr Ed
The killing of 50,000 3 month old human fetuses or the killing of 50,000 dogs?

Killing the unborn babies is the worse of the two. 🙁

Originally posted by Robtard
Sounds like something from The Matrix... Let me guess, you swallowed the red pill?

Guessing, for someone of your apparant brainpower, could be a dangerous thing 'Tard. I'd not do too much of it.

-AC

Originally posted by Robtard
Here is one of the outcomes...

hysterical

thumbup1

rednecks think she's hot 😘

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Guessing, for someone of your apparant brainpower, could be a dangerous thing 'Tard. I'd not do too much of it.

-AC

Oh, please do tell me what my brain power is? I'm dying to know; especially coming from an intellectual juggernaut such as yourself.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, you confused me, but I will not bash ya for it.

The definition of "Life" is one of the main pro-abortion / anti-abortion controversies.

w
Yeah I get ya.

Originally posted by Robtard
intellectual juggernaut

best screenname caption EVER

Originally posted by PVS
best screenname caption EVER

If you want to use it, be sure to pay me royalties.

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh, please do tell me what my brain power is? I'm dying to know; especially coming from an intellectual juggernaut such as yourself.

The funniest part is, you labelled me an intellectual juggernaut and label yourself Robtard. Which is actually closer to what you are.

To answer your question, no I didn't swallow the red pill, nor is it anything to do with The Matrix. However, given the diabolical arguments you displayed in the abortion thread, my choice and any reason for picking it would be wasted on you.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
The funniest part is, you labelled me an intellectual juggernaut and label yourself Robtard. Which is actually closer to what you are.

To answer your question, no I didn't swallow the red pill, nor is it anything to do with The Matrix. However, given the diabolical arguments you displayed in the abortion thread, my choice and any reason for picking it would be wasted on you.

-AC

So a stupid little screen name encompasses who we are? Ok, by that logic you think yourself the 'Brightest Star'; hence me calling you (sarcastically) an intellectual juggernaut. Duh...

It was a rhetorical question and on the lines of a joke, albeit a bad one. I obviously do not think The Matrix is real so therefore there would be no pill to swallow... Diabolical arguments? WTF? Just because I disagree that a fetus isn't a 'life' doesn't have anything to be with me being the devil or relating to such and yet again, you refer to me as not being intelligent. Lol

Originally posted by Robtard
So a stupid little screen name encompasses who we are? Ok, by that logic you think yourself the 'Brightest Star'; hence me calling you (sarcastically) an intellectual juggernaut. Duh...

It was a rhetorical question and on the lines of a joke, albeit a bad one. I obviously do not think The Matrix is real so therefore there would be no pill to swallow... Diabolical arguments? WTF? Just because I disagree that a fetus isn't a 'life' doesn't have anything to be with me being the devil or relating to such and yet again, you refer to me as not being intelligent. Lol

Chill out, man. I'm messing with you. Don't take everything I say seriously.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Chill out, man. I'm messing with you. Don't take everything I say seriously.

-AC

I'm laughing actually.

Re: Which is more severe...

Originally posted by Mr Ed
The killing of 50,000 3 month old human fetuses or the killing of 50,000 dogs?
What's worse is that we have gotten to the point of over population and no control or respect that we would need to kill 50,000 dogs or fetuses.

wow, how could someone value an animal's life against one of our own. It doesn't matter if it isn't developed, it's still an early stage of human life. Who has the right to kill 50k fetuses?