We are monkeys...

Started by Remulous6 pages

were those molecuels alive.and if so where did they come from, its just a theory not the absolute truth.

Originally posted by Remulous
what did that single celled organism come from

If you really want answers to your questions, you should do your own research. I'll start you off:

Wikipedia's abiogenesis article.

TalkOrigins, the internets premier evolution site. It even has a search engine, so, for example, you can type in "why are there still monkeys" and get an answer to that question.

Seriously; Shaky and Robtard aren't your personal research team.

Originally posted by Remulous
were those molecuels alive.and if so where did they come from, its just a theory not the absolute truth.

Nah, molecules are not alive...they form things that we consider to be "alive". And yes, it is a theory, it can very well be the absolute truth too though.

Originally posted by Gregory
If you really want answers to your questions, you should do your own research. I'll start you off:

Wikipedia's abiogenesis article.

TalkOrigins, the internets premier evolution site. It even has a search engine, so, for example, you can type in "why are there still monkeys" and get an answer to that question.

Seriously; Shaky and Robtard aren't your personal research team.

😆 if no 1 can ansewer my questions then i have proven that evolution does not exist thus man not comeing from apes.thanks guys its been a blast 👆

Originally posted by Remulous
😆 if no 1 can ansewer my questions then i have proven that evolution does not exist thus man not comeing from apes.thanks guys its been a blast 👆

Are you kidding? How does that a) prove that evolution does not exist? And b) you did get a possible answer, no one knows if it is the true answer,b ut it could be very well...you did not disprove anything.

Originally posted by Remulous
maybe your not getting me,i want to know HOW things evolve not why.and i actually think the insults were a bit childish and unecessary.

And I and others gave you the answers, yet you keep asking repetitive questions. Which insults? I did not insult you; I made a valid observation that you do not read/comprehend what people post which leads you back to my above comment about repetitive post. You'd know it if I was insulting you.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Are you kidding? How does that a) prove that evolution does not exist? And b) you did get a possible answer, no one knows if it is the true answer,b ut it could be very well...you did not disprove anything.

It's called utter ignorance. 'Hey, I've never actually stood on the surface of Mars, therefore it doesn't exist.'

Don't take him seriously, he was just trolling us along for some form of entertainment. I'm thinking he is a WHOB sock.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Nah, molecules are not alive...they form things that we consider to be "alive". And yes, it is a theory, it can very well be the absolute truth too though.
1 more thing when i was younger,back when i was in school we did an experiment.it was thought that flys and maggots came from dead rotten meat,that was proven to be un true just like it said in the text book,thus this fact was prooven that nothing alive can come from something that isnt.so then how was the first live organism born from none living molecules.think about it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Which insults? I did not insult you; I made a valid observation that you do not read/comprehend what people post which leads you back to my above comment about repetitive post.

I assume he was talking about me. Considering how the thread has progressed, I can't say I feel terribly guilty about them.

1 more thing when i was younger,back when i was in school we did an experiment.it was thought that flys and maggots came from dead rotten meat,that was proven to be un true just like it said in the text book,thus this fact was prooven that nothing alive can come from something that isnt.so then how was the first live organism born from none living molecules.think about it.

Listen; we've all heard of that experement, if not done it. It disproved a specific hypothesis, spontantious generation. As you'd know if you'd read the wikipedia link I gave you ... wait, what the hell am I doing? I gave you the link, even though you could have easily gotten it with a quick google search. If you're too lazy to even read the damn thing yourself, it's not our job to provide a summary.

u r 1 mean dude

Originally posted by Gregory
I assume he was talking about me. Considering how the thread has progressed, I can't say I feel terribly guilty about them.

He was just baiting us for a reaction, so don't feel guilty. Can't imagine how that would entertain anyone; you'd think he would have a better output for entertainment on the weekend.

Originally posted by Gregory
I assume he was talking about me. Considering how the thread has progressed, I can't say I feel terribly guilty about them.

Listen; we've all heard of that experement, if not done it. It disproved a specific hypothesis, spontantious generation. As you'd know if you'd read the wikipedia link I gave you ... wait, what the hell am I doing? I gave you the link, even though you could have easily gotten it with a quick google search. If you're too lazy to even read the damn thing yourself, it's not our job to provide a summary.

i did not take those sites in acount b cuase their just throwing info at u but with no proof behind it,its invalid proof i cant go out and prove it my self,that means a scientist cood tell u anything and it wood b true just becuase he or she is a scientist

Originally posted by Remulous
i did not take those sites in acount b cy=uase their just throwing info at u but with no proof behind it,its invalid proof i cant go out and prove it my self,that means a scientist cood tell u anything and it wood b true just becuase he or she is a scientist

Which begs the question, if you didn't read them how do you know what they have to offer? Maybe they have every bit of proof you would need. Duh... Seriously, find another hobby besides being a internet troll.

Originally posted by Robtard
He was just baiting us for a reaction, so don't feel guilty. Can't imagine how that would entertain anyone; you'd think he would have a better output for entertainment on the weekend.
u asume to much, where im at it isnt the weekend,it actualy just passed.i cant b leave u r even on the computer on the week end

It's Friday evening in Pennsylvania. There is nowhere in the world where it is Monday.

Originally posted by Gregory
It's Friday evening in Pennsylvania. There is nowhere in the world where it is Monday.
if u say so

Originally posted by Remulous
u asume to much, where im at it isnt the weekend,it actualy just passed.i cant b leave u r even on the computer on the week end

Here in sunny California USA it is 5:34pm on a Friday and I am just about to leave work and officially start my weekend... Where in the hell do you live that it's Monday already? At the most, it is late afternoon on a Saturday where you are. Therefore you are a liar.

Originally posted by Robtard
Which begs the question, if you didn't read them how do you know what they have to offer? Maybe they have every bit of proof you would need. Duh... Seriously, find another hobby besides being a internet troll.
i did read them i just didnt take them seriously.your the real net troll,a mean 1 too 😈

Originally posted by Remulous
i did read them i just didnt take them seriously.your the real net troll,a mean 1 too 😈

And you have offered nothing to the debate of worth and you're a liar as proven above.

Originally posted by Robtard
Here in sunny California USA it is 5:34pm on a Friday and I am just about to leave work and officially start my weekend... Where in the hell do you live that it's Monday already? At the most, it is late afternoon on a Saturday where you are. Therefore you are a liar.

Honestly, isn't that the most embarassing lie you ever heard? If you go to Japan or parts of Russia, you could get as late as Saturday afternoon, but Monday? It's like he thought we weren't convinced that he was a troll, so he decided to throw some more evidence our way.

(Way to make me look like redundant by editing your post. Oh well.)