Was The Moon Landing Real?

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
I didn't retailiate in this thread despite being called a retard, anyway grand, this is why you should moderate this forum.

And no offense to Grand, but he's not quite responsible enough to moderate the forum. Even if he was, he isn't really on enough. 😬

Anyhoo, on topic....

That's true. Anything will move in zero gravity. Stars aren't caught well by cameras. However, I doubt that the filming of the landing occured on the moon. I do, however, think they landed on it.

Light disrupts vision of the Stars, that's why you can't see most things in Urban areas

Actually, that's ambiant light, which is sort of different.

Originally posted by TheKingofKINGS!
Um...yes you did.

Why are you starting again?

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Why are you starting again?

NOW BACK ON-TOPIC.

Originally posted by TheKingofKINGS!

That's true. Anything will move in zero gravity. Stars aren't caught well by cameras. However, I doubt that the filming of the landing occured on the moon. I do, however, think they landed on it.

Originally posted by TheKingofKINGS!
I'm not starting, I'm just calling you up on your lie, as you are trying to be innocent.

NOW BACK ON-TOPIC.

Then stay on topic, you were warned about this before, yet, you continue to advocate problems?

Yet you continue to go off topic. None of my recent posts have been completely off topic.

On-topic now...

Originally posted by TheKingofKINGS!
That's true. Anything will move in zero gravity. Stars aren't caught well by cameras. However, I doubt that the filming of the landing occured on the moon. I do, however, think they landed on it.

Originally posted by TheKingofKINGS!
Yet you continue to go off topic. None of my recent posts have been completely off topic.

On-topic now...

You called me out, that's off topic. stop starting conflict and stay on topic/

Seriously people, TKOK, you could have just left it and said nothing, your comment was unnecessary and it is clear you where trying to be snide and get a hit in at Ashtar, but were also trying to cover yourself by posting on-topic at the same time, Ashtar, you took the bait and kept it going, you two are going to get yourselves in alot of trouble!

Anywhoo

Thats an interesting theory TKOK, that the filmed pre/post being on the moon...never thought of that. But wouldn't the Russians have a way of detecting wherever America got to the moon or not?

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Seriously people, TKOK, you could have just left it and said nothing, your comment was unnecessary and it is clear you where trying to be snide and get a hit in at Ashtar, but were also trying to cover yourself by posting on-topic at the same time, Ashtar, you took the bait and kept it going, you two are going to get yourselves in alot of trouble!

Anywhoo

Thats an interesting theory TKOK, that the filmed pre/post being on the moon...never thought of that. But wouldn't the Russians have a way of detecting wherever America got to the moon or not?

How could the Russians know? Unless they had satellites or something on the exact location of the landings, watching it as it happened

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Seriously people, TKOK, you could have just left it and said nothing, your comment was unnecessary and it is clear you where trying to be snide and get a hit in at Ashtar, but were also trying to cover yourself by posting on-topic at the same time, Ashtar, you took the bait and kept it going, you two are going to get yourselves in alot of trouble!

Anywhoo

Thats an interesting theory TKOK, that the filmed pre/post being on the moon...never thought of that. But wouldn't the Russians have a way of detecting wherever America got to the moon or not?

I'm sorry.

Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
How could the Russians know? Unless they had satellites or something on the exact location of the landings, watching it as it happened

Thats why I am asking, could the Russians have had that capability?

While what you say is correct, you are constructing it in a way with the intention of offending Ashtar, don't deny it, try and put your points across without scorn or snide.

sorry, I'm a blunt person. I do not mince words nor do I attempt to dance around truths to spare one's feelings. If somebody gets their feelings hurt because I flat out tell them they do not have any knowledge on the subject they are attempting to discuss and are impeding the discussion of us that do, they ought to either leave the topic or research the topic to gain knowledge before posting again.....so be it.

I come to this forum, the philosophy forum and religion forum to have discussions on topics......and debate differing views. If somebody get's their feelings hurt because they are told their view has no merit as they have no knowledge on the subject, basing their view on completely wrong assumptions contrary to fact.......let them go cry to their mommy.

The solution is simple. Actually do a little research, educate yourself on any given topic you choose to post about before you ever put your finger to keyboard the first time.

Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
How could the Russians know? Unless they had satellites or something on the exact location of the landings, watching it as it happened

They could've also filmed it on earth, sent them to the moon, and broadcasted the recording whilst they were on the moon. Meaning they could get around the whole "detection" thing. But I really don't know.

I work for a company here in the UK and one of our biggest customers is Lockheed Martin. who made the Apollo rockets and have just won the gig for the next Moon craft. These guys are so anal that there's no way they could be part of a conspiracy and trust everyone to keep their mouths shut about it. Trust me, I deal with Lockheed Martin every day and they ruin my day. Every day.

I did some nasa research looked at radiation and a lot of it seems correct all that confses me is the ressitance of the van allen belts

also where'd i say i got a degree

Watch this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwSQVgUR3v0

😆

Originally posted by Evil Dead
yes, we landed on the moon. It was a stupid show of technological might..........

all these "we didn't land on the moon" people state an absurd declaration without any facts to support their claim. Some nut said it a few decades ago......every instance he gave as reason for his dis-belief have been thoroughly debunked........yet people still latch on to this.

It's like the cattle mutilation urban myth. It was debunked over 20 years ago......by scientists actually leaving dead cattle to deteriorate in a field naturally.......yet people still bring this up......like they don't have access to the internet and google.

I may not be well-versed upon the complexities of the effect of burning fuel upon carbon in zero-atmosphere environments... but where was the Blast crater underneath the Eagle lunar lander? even if it couldn't blacken the soft soil then there had to have been a crater from the stabilizers and the counter-thrust rockets on the lander itself?

All pictures of the direct feed show crisp clean moon-soil unerneath it...

I'm perplexed on just how one might explain something like that... 😕

No, actually, there wouldn't be one.

The lander was on minimal thrust at the point it landed and the pressure being generated was only about one and a half pounds per square inch, which is barely enough to leave a small dent. Furthermore, exhaust dissipates almost immediately in a vacuum- it is the atmosphere on Earth that forces exhaust into a column that might cause a crater.

So twice over, there is no reason for there to be one.

it was fake. end of story.