Was The Moon Landing Real?

Started by Aliies9 pages

Originally posted by Ushgarak
No, actually, there wouldn't be one.

The lander was on minimal thrust at the point it landed and the pressure being generated was only about one and a half pounds per square inch, which is barely enough to leave a small dent. Furthermore, exhaust dissipates almost immediately in a vacuum- it is the atmosphere on Earth that forces exhaust into a column that might cause a crater.

So twice over, there is no reason for there to be one.

Cheers Ush, you're always a helpful source if info 😄 That was the only thing I ever questioned about the landing...

And seeing how you know so much; It it possible to buy a printed version or would I need to carry you around? 😛

te orginal footage of the moonlanding was not true, but then have been there between now and then

never did know if i'm gonna believe the thing or not...

should i?

No one has ever gone further than the Van Allen belts, simple as that.

Lie...

Originally posted by willman
it was fake. end of story.

I havent studied enough about this subject like I have with the kennedy assassination and 9-11 to be able to comment on it or not but seeing the way they lied about those two events Im sure your probably right about that,that it was fake.

it was fake bicnarok is right, no1 has made it past van allens belt, at that time it was impossible, and knowing this is the reason they shot it in studio's

Except that's not at all true. Yes they can (and did) go past the Van Allen Belts, and that is hardly secret and obscure science.

There is no atmosphere on the monn why did the flag wave

Originally posted by don_roberts
There is no atmosphere on the monn why did the flag wave
Solar winds.

Originally posted by don_roberts
There is no atmosphere on the moon why did the flag wave

I agree with the theory that we didnt land on the moon but my dad told me when i was young that because there was no resistance on the moon, the flag waved because nothing was stopping it. But the thing was a hoax

Gah, no it was not a hoax!

And why WOULDN'T the flag wave?

What is this nonsense which says that something cannot wave if there is no atmosphere? WHY, exactly? What would prevent it from waving?

What you mean is that there is no wind there to make it wave without another stimulus. Fine. Presumably, then, you are suggesting that the whole thing was shot on a set where there was wind blowing through it that made the flag wave and hence is a giveaway? And then couldn't be arsed to re-shoot it? Geez, such idiocy.

The flag will wave if you move it, or when it settles. But in this particular case, the flag isn't even waving. It just has a ripple in it as it isn't fully extended.

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
It' It's the same with crop circles, 90% are proven to be hoaxes yet the other genuine 10% is also debunked since the majority is a hoax.

Bullshit. Quit making up lies, instead of doing research you just pulled that out of thin air.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQ_wNwDXC5k&mode=related&search=

The strongest evidence is Shepard and the Hammer and Feather experiment. They fall at the exact rate to calculate the mass of the moon. No strings are visible.

It's to precise to be a fake even today!

Originally posted by o kiMMii o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQ_wNwDXC5k&mode=related&search=

Because there is no way conspiracy theorists would have staged a fake moon landing.

I'm tired of this. So I will end it right here. The flag was extended because there was a metal pole put in the top of the flag. It was waving because when it was set, the motion of the flag was caused by the astronaut touching it. It continued to wave because there was no force to stop it. There was gravity, but the moon's gravity is weak. The dust moved because the wheels hit it and shoved it upward. The lander caused a "mark" in the dirt because when the exhaust came out, it had to it something. It hit the rocks and pushed them outward. This is possible in space. Now will everyone PLEASE stop complaining.(Although I know that no one will)

Re: Was The Moon Landing Real?

Originally posted by Remulous
Do u really think America landed on the moon?If so do u think we were really the 1st country to do it?
What do you mean we, pale face?

Originally posted by Darth Brumbo
I'm tired of this. So I will end it right here. The flag was extended because there was a metal pole put in the top of the flag. It was waving because when it was set, the motion of the flag was caused by the astronaut touching it. It continued to wave because there was no force to stop it. There was gravity, but the moon's gravity is weak. The dust moved because the wheels hit it and shoved it upward. The lander caused a "mark" in the dirt because when the exhaust came out, it had to it something. It hit the rocks and pushed them outward. This is possible in space. Now will everyone PLEASE stop complaining.(Although I know that no one will)

I think you are right and everyone else who said that they faked it is wrong

Originally posted by MURDEROUS RYU
Do u really think America landed on the moon?If so do u think we were really the 1st country to do it?
Why wouldn't it be real?