Originally posted by FeceManIf you are talking about polyploidy, which I suspect you are, you have a point. In animals it cannot be explained as far as I know, but in plants it is natural feasible because the genetic duplication can lie dormant for generations as it can simply self fertilize.
That's what she said.I'm just wondering--isn't the process of creating more genetic information via DNA duplication contradictory to natural selection? It seems so, since those individuals with duplicated DNA (probbaly) don't show any advantage and thus waste resources by copying the extra genetic information--therefore, they would have a lesser chance of reproduction and survival.
Originally posted by Nellinator
If you are talking about polyploidy, which I suspect you are, you have a point. In animals it cannot be explained as far as I know, but in plants it is natural feasible because the genetic duplication can lie dormant for generations as it can simply self fertilize.
Incorrect assumption...
Originally posted by Nellinator
If you are talking about polyploidy, which I suspect you are, you have a point. In animals it cannot be explained as far as I know, but in plants it is natural feasible because the genetic duplication can lie dormant for generations as it can simply self fertilize.
Darwinism (macro-evolution) is false. Claims, however, have been made stipulating that macro-evolution -- having zero evidence mind you -- is a scientific fact. Darwinists would have you believe: (A) Nothing produces everything, (B) Non-life produces life, (C) Randomness produces fine-tuning, (D) Chaos produces information, (E) Unconciousness produces conciousness, and (F) Non-reason produces reason. Simply amazing! Where do sign?
Advancements in science over the past 30 years, particularly molecular biology, has (and is) forcing scientists to objectively question the validity of Darwinian theory. Dare I say for, "obvious" reasons?!
Learn why: http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/molecular_biology_09.html
Originally posted by ushomefree
Learn why: http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/molecular_biology_09.html
Same old, same old . . . . nothing new here (Irreducible complexity(!), angiosperms(!), horse evolution(!) etc.).
I assume that many of you chose not to review the website (http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/molecular_biology_09.html) posted with my last message. If my assumptions are incorrect, I apologize. If, however, I am right, perhaps you'll be willing to watch a movie instead? The movie consists of 8 parts, and it is very informative -- leaving nothing open to interpretation. So... grab a pen and paper! Take notes, and ask critical questions!! Get involved in all available resources in search of truth!!! Take care everyone.
The Collapse of Darwinism:
(1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7F7-3E90PU
(2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8Gc2RnItbA
(3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIrr_yilRfY
(4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDgw9OmJ34o
(5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhSCOJuVzes
(6) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVvfJMiuX7U