Creation vs Evolution

Started by JesusIsAlive221 pages
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Kings are all the Torah.

Wrong, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy constitute the Torah--not the Book of Kings.

http://doodoodoodoodoo.ytmnd.com/

Kirk Cameron defeats evolution.

Originally posted by FeceMan
http://doodoodoodoodoo.ytmnd.com/

Kirk Cameron defeats evolution.

😆 Thats just absolutly awsome!!

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You don't have to follow organized religion. You are supposed to be following Jesus, and no, Jesus did not come to bring religion. Jesus came that we might have life (eternal) and have it more abundantly.

Will you stop spamming? No one wants to hear you talk. And you are not supposed to be following anybody. It is your free ****ing choice to do, and I am quite happy not to.

There are two videos which I have already posted in a different thread around here. But fits more in this one.
YouTube video

YouTube video

Whoever takes himself the time to watch this, try the creationist tour again. I think this proves absolutely clearly that evolution did happen. And I don't wanna hear that "God planted the evidence to mislead science". That is plain stupidity, and just what I expect of JIA.

Originally posted by eezy45
Will you stop spamming? No one wants to hear you talk. And you are not supposed to be following anybody. It is your free ****ing choice to do, and I am quite happy not to.

There are two videos which I have already posted in a different thread around here. But fits more in this one.
YouTube video

YouTube video

Whoever takes himself the time to watch this, try the creationist tour again. I think this proves absolutely clearly that evolution did happen. And I don't wanna hear that "God planted the evidence to mislead science". That is plain stupidity, and just what I expect of JIA.

Evolution did not happen. Your video proves nothing.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Evolution did not happen. Your video proves nothing.

The video proves nothing? It more or less spells out the evidence for evolution. Unless you're a retard, you cant just dismess it.

Originally posted by Crimson Phoenix
The vidos proves nothing? It more or less spells out the evidence for evolution. Unless you're a retard, you cant just dismess it.

It spells out the evidence for evolution? With what, alphabet soup?

😄

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
It spells out the evidence for evolution? With what, alphabet soup?

😄

Please go to another forum.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
It spells out the evidence for evolution? With what, alphabet soup?

😄

Yes with alphabet soup!! Well done you get a star

Idiot

Originally posted by Crimson Phoenix
Yes with alphabet soup!! Well done you get a star

Idiot

😂

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
It spells out the evidence for evolution? With what, alphabet soup?

😄

over 40% of amercians believe the earth is less than 10000 years old{coincidentially, thats the same number of evangelists in america} and now i understand why.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
It spells out the evidence for evolution? With what, alphabet soup?

😄


That was somewhat "lol"-worthy.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Evolution did not happen. Your video proves nothing.

Right.

What about the retrovirus evidence? I mean, someone who claims to be Creationist argues by logic. You just say god made it so, which makes no sense.

Why would god create all life after the same DNA system? Why only A, C, G, T? Is he uncreative? Dude...

Originally posted by FeceMan
That was somewhat "lol"-worthy.
Not really.

How about "lal?"

Originally posted by eezy45
Right.

What about the retrovirus evidence? I mean, someone who claims to be Creationist argues by logic. You just say god made it so, which makes no sense.

Why would god create all life after the same DNA system? Why only A, C, G, T? Is he uncreative? Dude...


That is the lamest argument against creationism that I have ever read.

Originally posted by eezy45
Why would god create all life after the same DNA system? Why only A, C, G, T? Is he uncreative? Dude...

Makes perfect sense . . .

The retrovirus evidence makes perfect sense and is concrete evidence for evolution. Its difficult to see how anyone could refute it

Oh just thought i'd add, we're actually 50% similar to bananas not 60%. I'm just nitpicking 😄

Originally posted by FeceMan
That is the lamest argument against creationism that I have ever read.

I think not. If there is a perfect being, and he goes and creates all life on earth, why should he use this ultra-easy system anyway? Why are bananas 60% genetically identical to us then? I mean.. this sounds as if he liked it a little easier.

And again, what about the retrovirus evidence?