Creation vs Evolution

Started by PITT_HAPPENS221 pages

pitt_blank

Thats only one of my Attacks what about the other one??
+ That dose not disprove me...

Originally posted by Phenoix12
Thats only one of my Attacks what about the other one??
+ That dose not disprove me...

I showed you were the delta was. 🙄 You said there was no delta, so, me showing you were the delta was is "disproving you".

I that river carved out the grand canyon then shouldn't the delta be allot larger then that!! And what about my other Attack, you haven't touched it once!!

Originally posted by Phenoix12
I that river carved out the grand canyon then shouldn't the delta be allot larger then that!! And what about my other Attack, you haven't touched it once!!

I don't care about your other attack. As a matter of fact, I don't care about any of your attacks.

my other attack scientist cant explain by evolution, it can only be explained by instant creation!!!

Originally posted by Phenoix12
my other attack scientist cant explain by evolution, it can only be explained by instant creation!!!

It was too silly to even consider. First read a book on evolution. If you want to debunk evolution, you should learn as much as possible about it.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
It was too silly to even consider. First read a book on evolution. If you want to debunk evolution, you should learn as much as possible about it.

Do you even remember what my other attack was???

Originally posted by Phenoix12
Do you even remember what my other attack was???

Does it matter? I do remember telling you to read a book, because you had it all wrong. I could back read, but I really don't care that much. Just look above at the posts that JIA did. I have worked hard at trying to find information to post on this topic, but people like you and JIA are not going to listen. Why should I waist my time with you? If I spend a lot of my valuable time, and post a real answer to your question, you will just dismiss me without reading it.

I know the reason you wont try to explain y my other attack is wrong. Its because you know its correct, it shows, Scientifically that the world was created in a instant.

Originally posted by Phenoix12
I know the reason you wont try to explain y my other attack is wrong. Its because you know its correct, it shows, Scientifically that the world was created in a instant.

Go away. You cannot read my mind, and I am not afraid of your silly ideas.

Try to disprove my ""silly"" Idea.

Originally posted by Phenoix12
Try to disprove my ""silly"" Idea.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
This thread is not for you to display your arts and crafts Shakyamunison (and I thought you knew better). Besides show and tell is for children.

Ummm.. What does this have any thing to do with our debate?!?

Alos, Did you know that scientific evidence abounds to support the biblical accounts of creation and the flood? Were you aware that reports outlining this evidence passed peer review, and were published in the open scientific literature? Have you heard that, decades later, this evidence still stands unrefuted by the scientific community?

Originally posted by Phenoix12
Ummm.. What does this have any thing to do with our debate?!?

Alos, Did you know that scientific evidence abounds to support the biblical accounts of creation and the flood? Were you aware that reports outlining this evidence passed peer review, and were published in the open scientific literature? Have you heard that, decades later, this evidence still stands unrefuted by the scientific community?

Read my post this time.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Does it matter? I do remember telling you to read a book, because you had it all wrong. I could back read, but I really don't care that much. Just look above at the posts that JIA did. I have worked hard at trying to find information to post on this topic, but people like you and JIA are not going to listen. Why should I waist my time with you? If I spend a lot of my valuable time, and post a real answer to your question, you will just dismiss me without reading it.
Originally posted by Phenoix12
Try to disprove my ""silly"" Idea.

Come on I dare you!!!

Originally posted by Phenoix12
Come on I dare you!!!
If I spend a lot of my valuable time, and post a real answer to your question, you will just dismiss me without reading it.

You still haven't answered my question. Are you scared or something???? Or do you know that I am right but don't want to admit it!!!!

Originally posted by Phenoix12
You still haven't answered my question. Are you scared or something???? Or do you know that I am right but don't want to admit it!!!!

I told you that it was a waist of my time and you didn't listen. Instead you just tried to waist more of my time. If you had been more considerate of my concerns, then I would have continued talking to you. However, I am done.

Phenoix12: You claim to have real scientific evidence of creation. While I am sure you can produce at a moment's notice links to sites where this propoganda is spewed from, I have a more mechanistic question for you.

What constitutes good science to you? Clearly we agree that not all scientists or their work should be listened to all of the time, but what method do you have to determine what is real science and what is not real science?