Originally posted by inimalist
For the most part I am just re-stating the principals of the selfish gene and pretty much plagiarizing Dawkins' work in the Ancestor's Tale.As far as real substantiation, microbiology isn't my specialty, but in a couple of days I would probably be able to find studies and papers that discuss this.
If I found peer review scientific journals that talk about these processes would that be good evidence for you?
I am looking for proof not just a treatise on a subject, so if it substantiates what you are talking about then yes.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I am looking for proof not just a treatise on a subject, so if it substantiates what you are talking about then yes.
You are not telling the truth. You do not want proof. Proof of evolution is the last thing on Earth that you would ever want. That is why you have ignored all proof that has been given you. You have ignored it or dismissed it out of hand. You are like a child kicking his feet and flailing his arms saying "there is no evolution, there is no evolution...".
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You are not telling the truth. You do not want proof. Proof of evolution is the last thing on Earth that you would ever want. That is why you have ignored all proof that has been given you. You have ignored it or dismissed it out of hand. You are like a child kicking his feet and flailing his arms saying "there is no evolution, there is no evolution...".
Macroevolution does not exist.
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
I don't believe it...you've finally put yourself up against out would be scientists!
Most people think of Species as something black or white. The truth is speciation is just a system of identifying commonalities and differences among animals. There is no real hard edge to spieciation when you consider time. A small rodent like animal could become a wide range of different animals if given the correct circumstances and enough time.
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
See, the way I see it. You enjoy sitting here and going on about how evolution is correct purely because it doesn't (to you) offer anything against Buddhism, (I have a friend who is a Buddhist now as it happens) but this siding with evolutionists will lead to the downfall of your own faith.
What Im trying to say, is your acting like the Catholic Church in Nazi Austira.
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
See, the way I see it. You enjoy sitting here and going on about how evolution is correct purely because it doesn't (to you) offer anything against Buddhism, (I have a friend who is a Buddhist now as it happens) but this siding with evolutionists will lead to the downfall of your own faith.
How will evolutionary theory lead to the downfall of Budhism? 😕