Well that page is a waste of server space, it doesn’t explain anything. One of their first statements is that there is no scientific proof since Darwin, which is a bunch of BS. The creation theory has never had any proof what so ever, the proof of evolution is been well documented and is evident in everyday life.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I would not trust them. I believe that they would lie to me.
You are proven wrong but refuse the facts. They discuss Radiometric dating such as Potassium-Agon and Argon-Argon dating, Fission Track Dating, and Uranium-Helium dating. In Nigeria a rock was dated 95 million years old with Potassium-Argon dating, 750 millions years old using Uranium-Helium dating, and 30 million years old with fission track dating.
Originally posted by ThePittman
Well that page is a waste of server space, it doesn’t explain anything. One of their first statements is that there is no scientific proof since Darwin, which is a bunch of BS. The creation theory has never had any proof what so ever, the proof of evolution is been well documented and is evident in everyday life.
Not evolution as in animals changing over periods of time to better themselves to their enivorment but the fact that the earth and the universe is billions of years old.
Originally posted by ESB -1138
You are proven wrong but refuse the facts. They discuss Radiometric dating such as Potassium-Agon and Argon-Argon dating, Fission Track Dating, and Uranium-Helium dating. In Nigeria a rock was dated 95 million years old with Potassium-Argon dating, 750 millions years old using Uranium-Helium dating, and 30 million years old with fission track dating.
? 😕 Are you out of your mind?
You say I am proven wrong because I don't trust people with a hidden agenda?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
What scientist are you talking about?
Many scientists (mostly those who study astronomy) believe in God.
You are assuming there is a word of God. There is no such thing. All books on this planet were written my humans. We make the rules, and we can change them
And yet it seems you believe science books without question.
Originally posted by ESB -1138
Many scientists (mostly those who study astronomy) believe in God.[b]You are assuming there is a word of God. There is no such thing. All books on this planet were written my humans. We make the rules, and we can change them
And yet it seems you believe science books without question. [/B]
What scientist are you talking about? I want names. Also, name the books.
Originally posted by ESB -1138However they offer no facts so I’m not refusing anything. Noting about creationism has ever been proven or shown even a hit of proof, many of the dating procedures that you mention like Uranium-Helium dating has already been discredited as a non-reliable dating because of the nature of Helium as many of the others.
You are proven wrong but refuse the facts. They discuss Radiometric dating such as Potassium-Agon and Argon-Argon dating, Fission Track Dating, and Uranium-Helium dating. In Nigeria a rock was dated 95 million years old with Potassium-Argon dating, 750 millions years old using Uranium-Helium dating, and 30 million years old with fission track dating.
Originally posted by ESB -1138Yet you believe the bible and your religion without question with not type of proof at all, I believe as many others do in things that can be replicated and tested by others.
Many scientists (mostly those who study astronomy) believe in God.[b]You are assuming there is a word of God. There is no such thing. All books on this planet were written my humans. We make the rules, and we can change them
And yet it seems you believe science books without question. [/B]
ESB -1138 because you could not tell me the names of the scientists that you are talking about, I know that you are repeating something you have read or heard. You should ask the people who told you that for the names of the scientists. That way, you can go and check on what they are telling you make your own mind up. However, if you are closed minded, you will not do it.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
ESB -1138 because you could not tell me the names of the scientists that you are talking about, I know that you are repeating something you have read or heard. You should ask the people who told you that for the names of the scientists. That way, you can go and check on what they are telling you make your own mind up. However, if you are closed minded, you will not do it.
You are the one rejecting information because it tries to support the Bible. But the moment someone makes a claim to try to disprove the Bible it seems that you are all over that. All scientists have are theories, nothing more and nothing less.
Originally posted by ESB -1138If someone can prove to me that the bible is correct and can back that up with any type of evidence other than “you must have faith” I’ll be the first one to believe but until then I will go with what can be proven or explained through proven means. I’m willing to take any advice and I’m very open minded, I have talked to many people of faith and get the same thing over and over again. Most people of religion that I have ever talked to including most on this form tries to say how wrong the math is that disproves the bible but never comes up with anything to say that the bible is correct and can back it up.
You are the one rejecting information because it tries to support the Bible. But the moment someone makes a claim to try to disprove the Bible it seems that you are all over that. All scientists have are theories, nothing more and nothing less.
Originally posted by ThePittman
If someone can prove to me that the bible is correct and can back that up with any type of evidence other than “you must have faith” I’ll be the first one to believe but until then I will go with what can be proven or explained through proven means. I’m willing to take any advice and I’m very open minded, I have talked to many people of faith and get the same thing over and over again. Most people of religion that I have ever talked to including most on this form tries to say how wrong the math is that disproves the bible but never comes up with anything to say that the bible is correct and can back it up.