Originally posted by JaehSkywalker
so.. the one that says darwin contradicted himself afterwards coz he accepted jesus in his life is a rumour?
Absolutely.
Darwin was a very religious man throught his entire life. He viewed Natural selection as "God's mechanism" for life on earth. The reason he was so intereseted in natural history stemmed from his desire to study creation. Darwin went to seminary school and for a time in his life aspired to join the clergy.
Darwin never would have denied Jesus.
Originally posted by Alliancenotworthy
Absolutely.Darwin was a very religious man throught his entire life. He viewed Natural selection as "God's mechanism" for life on earth. The reason he was so intereseted in natural history stemmed from his desire to study creation. Darwin went to seminary school and for a time in his life aspired to join the clergy.
Darwin never would have denied Jesus.
Originally posted by Alliance
Absolutely.Darwin was a very religious man throught his entire life. He viewed Natural selection as "God's mechanism" for life on earth. The reason he was so intereseted in natural history stemmed from his desire to study creation. Darwin went to seminary school and for a time in his life aspired to join the clergy.
Darwin never would have denied Jesus.
err... okay...
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why are evolutionists so obsessed with their beliefs that they discount anything that contradicts what they believe no matter how overwhelming incontrovertible the evidence is?
1. There is no such thing as an "evolutionist."
2. We are not obsessed with our beliefs (you are obsessed with yours).
3. The theory of Natural Selection has been repeatedly changed since its inception, often drastically, to incorparate new evedince.
4. Stuff you present is not "evidence" its crap from online zealots who don't understand the Theory or its evidence.
5. The evidence in overwhelming support of Natural Selection, not the other way around.
6. This philosphy that you have described is exactly what you do. In fact, I'm willing to be that wherever you copied and pasted that from, you simply changed the word creationist to "evolutionist."
7. I know what Intelligent Design and Creationism are. I've studied them, and read thier "evidence" and listened to thier arguments. Natural Selection does not deny a divine creation, it denies a literal 6-day creation. Intelligent Dsesign is NOT a sicentific theory and is a product of public misconception about what Natural Selection is.
Of course people what to ***** about Natural selection all they want, but heaven forbid the actually LEARNED what they were arguing against.
Most scientists and those who support evolution take great offense when they are called "godless" by people like you. Many take thier faith serously and do a better job of representing Christ than you could possible ever hope to.
Originally posted by JaehSkywalker
err... okay...
I'm very serious. Scientists of Darwins time were incredibly spiritual. It was very different from science today. Studying the Natural world was a holy way to devote your self to god, to figure out the ways in which god works.
Darwin would have percieved his work on Natural Selection as a way to bring him closer to God.
In some ways science has changed a lot. In some ways it hasn't.
Originally posted by Alliance
I'm very serious. Scientists of Darwins time were incredibly spiritual. It was very different from science today. Studying the Natural world was a holy way to devote your self to god, to figure out the ways in which god works.Darwin would have percieved his work on Natural Selection as a way to bring him closer to God.
In some ways science has changed a lot. In some ways it hasn't.
who said you weren't? i just agreed...
Originally posted by JaehSkywalker
ok.... now i'm confused...i'm going to read about darwin at wikipedia to be sure...
http://www.episcopalchurch.org/19021_6568_ENG_HTM.htm
Click on this link Jay then press control "F" then type in the word "forty." Finally press "next."