Originally posted by Alliance
Not if Adam and Eve were created at the same time, as Genesis 1 suggests.However, I'f suggest that regardless of weather genesis 1 or 2 is correct, sexuality is a sinful subject that was not instituted until after they were kicked out of eden. Becuase we all know that women are dirty, especially because their bodies are controlled by their uteruses and not by thiers brans as men are.
It wasn't even proper do publically discuss many aspects of sexuality, especially childbirth, until the early 1800s.
EDIT: Wait, yes, I can.
Originally posted by Alliance
Most, if not all of Chirstianity is also not in the Bible.
sexuality is a sinful subject that was not instituted until after they were kicked out of eden. Becuase we all know that women are dirty, especially because their bodies are controlled by their uteruses and not by thiers brans as men are.
Originally posted by Nellinator
Actually not. I defy you to provide any Biblical quotes suggesting that women are driven by "their uteruses" and that men are controlled "by thiers brans"... Actually, the Bible very strongly supports that women are less prone to sexual sins then men. Damn sexism against men again.
You ask me to provide eveidence. You provide none. I'm not going to waste my time. Women have always been presented as more pious and a better preserver of morals. They've also been presented as emmotionally irrational and the items I've previously mentioned.
Read Leviticus and write down all the times women are considered unclean. Then learn how these views developed throughout the Christian empires and even into the 17th century. There is your evidence.
Originally posted by FeceMan
Yes, but, since you don't believe it, you were being facetious.
Well, the people who wrote the bible almost certianly believed it. We should be slightly aware of author bias.
People should also be aware of which aspects of the Bible they are rejecting, and which they are saying are the "immutable word of God," if they are claiming such.
Originally posted by AllianceWe aren't talking about the uncleanliness issues. We were talking about women thinking with their "uteruses" not "thier brans" like men which is not the Bible and your being full of crap. My evidence that women are portrayed as more sexually moral is Romans 1:26.
You ask me to provide eveidence. You provide none. I'm not going to waste my time. Women have always been presented as more pious and a better preserver of morals. They've also been presented as emmotionally irrational and the items I've previously mentioned.Read Leviticus and write down all the times women are considered unclean. Then learn how these views developed throughout the Christian empires and even into the 17th century. There is your evidence.
And for everything that makes women unclean in Leviticus I could list something that makes men unclean (damn sexism against men again, burn the Bible everyone), but then again you like to pull things out of context.
Views developed by "Christian empires" are inconsequential to what the Bible says. Thanks for playing though.
Originally posted by Nellinator
And for everything that makes women unclean in Leviticus I could list something that makes men unclean (damn sexism against men again, burn the Bible everyone), but then again you like to pull things out of context.
Actualyl, if you tried reading, nothing "against men" which is something against everyone is stated because they are a man. Women are unclean because they are women. Men are only unclean as a consequence of thier actions.
Originally posted by Nellinator
Views developed by "Christian empires" are inconsequential to what the Bible says. Thanks for playing though.
Considering they have defined Chirstianity, Christian policy, and the Bible, its very important. Please go back to your cavern.
Originally posted by Alliance
Actualyl, if you tried reading, nothing "against men" which is something against everyone is stated because they are a man. Women are unclean because they are women. Men are only unclean as a consequence of thier actions.Considering they have defined Chirstianity, Christian policy, and the Bible, its very important. Please go back to your cavern.
And no they did not define Christianity. Sorry, Christianity is not defined by anything other than the Bible. Anything contradictory to the Bible in regards to Christianity is inconsequential. Thanks for the attempt though.
Listen, I've already said I'm not going to waste my time with someone who doesn't provide facts.
I'm sick of your BS. Christianity is a religion. There are many ways to interpret a text. Any ignoramous who sits and spins that there is only one way to interpret a text is a bullshitter. Even when I do provide facts, you ignore them and run away. I'm no longer wasting my time with a member who doesn't contribute to this forum.
I just provided it. Romans 1:26 shows that women are less prone to sexual sin than men. You haven't refuted that. I also remember you leaving the argument about stoning and arguing that cutting someones throat is faster than instaneous death. But hey, I'm the one that's the idiot. The burden of proof is on you to substantiate the claims you made earlier about women thinking with their uteruses. But there isn't any and now you are trying to argue that I'm not backing my argument up? I given you evidence to the contrary and you've given no evidence at all except your predetermined bias and ignorance on the subject. Please play again.
Do you even read my posts, or do you just dance in ignorance. Your point has nothing to do with what I originally posted. You made a side point, one that has you simply bent on being a whtie "reverse sexist" crybaby. Try reading it agian this time, instead of simply being an ass.
Originally posted by Alliance
Women have always been presented as more pious and a better preserver of morals. They've also been presented as emmotionally irrational and the items I've previously mentioned.Anything "against men" in the Bible is something against everyone. Women are unclean because they are women. Men are only unclean as a consequence of thier actions.
That's not proof or supported. It is claims. Women are not unclean because they are women. You have not substantiated that, so the burden of proof still lies on you. Also, the reverse sexism argument is not to taken seriously, so in case you are missing the point, it is that you should not take what makes woman unclean by itself, without considering why and without considering whether or not it also applies to men. Also, your argument about things being against men being against everyone, is fallacious as there are distinct words used for males in the Hebrew. Until you know when those are being applied, you can't argue that.
Originally posted by Alliance
You ask me to provide eveidence. You provide none. I'm not going to waste my time. Women have always been presented as more pious and a better preserver of morals. They've also been presented as emmotionally irrational and the items I've previously mentioned.
Read Leviticus and write down all the times women are considered unclean. Then learn how these views developed throughout the Christian empires and even into the 17th century. There is your evidence.
You ask me to provide eveidence. You provide none. I'm not going to waste my time.
Well, the people who wrote the bible almost certianly believed it. We should be slightly aware of author bias.