Originally posted by Alliance
You're saying that because a concept exists...that is good justification that the concept is factual?
No. I am stating that the assumption that a concept is false without evidence is not a wise choice. The concept is possible, just not well supported, and according to some may be very low in probability. Assuming that things are not possible without evidence for such is weak, and is a poor basis for advancement.
I am stating that because the concept exists, its existence does support the possibility that it is factual. This is not the same as stating that the concept is factual.