Chick Tracts and the Bible why the discrimination?

Started by Gregory39 pages

For God's sake, debbiejo, get over it.

Originally posted by debbiejo
The Blameless? Aren't we all Blameless?
No.

Originally posted by Nellinator
No.
I am doped

Originally posted by Gregory
For God's sake, debbiejo, get over it.
no.

Well, if you enjoy being an obsessed neurotic, I guess it's your business.

Okay, thanks, Paul worshipper.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Okay, thanks, Paul worshipper.

Don't be mean. Paul worshippers are people too...

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
In other words, of all the people to save from the destruction of Sodom, your God chose an idiot.

Because righteousness, wisdom, and intellect do not necessarily go hand-in-hand.

Samson doesn't seem particularly bright (to me, at least) and he certainly isn't wise--but he was chosen by God nonetheless. Solomon was wise, and he was chosen by God, but he later turned from righteousness into idolatry.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Don't be mean. Paul worshippers are people too...
Yeah, they have their own god and everything...

Originally posted by debbiejo
Okay, thanks, Paul worshipper.

You just called an atheist who dislikes many of the teachings of Paul a Paul-worshiper. Tell me, do you wake up in the morning and say, "Today, I'm going to make an idiot of myself," or does it just sort of happen?

Originally posted by Gregory
You don't think getting drunk and f*cking your daughters is a sign of immorality or unrighteousness? Not even a little bit?

Someone's probably brought this up already, but when faced with a rape-hungry mob, Lot's first instinct was to offer his daughters ("Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes). Do you think offering your daughters up to be gang-raped indicates that your heart is in the right place?

It is worth considering that Lot's daughters indicated a certain level of desperation for men. You know, they did give their dad strong wine one night, with the sole intent of sleeping with him. Maybe Lot's daughters were a bit more horny towards the mob then the 3 holy men.

Just a thought. Here is another one:

Not all Christian religions believe that Lot actually offered his daughters to the mob...some say that was a mistake of the Bible. For example, Mormons believe that the Bible was completely accurate in it's original text, but was subject to mistakes during translation. There are 30 places in the Old Testament that Joseph Smith "translated", although there are presumably more that need translation. Anyway, they usually make more sense, whether you are Mormon or not.
http://scriptures.lds.org/en/jst/7

Being Mormon myself, I agree with thought #2.

Originally posted by Gregory
You just called an atheist who dislikes many of the teachings of Paul a Paul-worshiper. Tell me, do you wake up in the morning and say, "Today, I'm going to make an idiot of myself,"
Not really.

Originally posted by Quark_666
It is worth considering that Lot's daughters indicated a certain level of desperation for men. You know, they did give their dad strong wine one night, with the sole intent of sleeping with him. Maybe Lot's daughters were a bit more horny towards the mob then the 3 holy men.

Just a thought. Here is another one:

Not all Christian religions believe that Lot actually offered his daughters to the mob...some say that was a mistake of the Bible. For example, Mormons believe that the Bible was completely accurate in it's original text, but was subject to mistakes during translation. There are 30 places in the Old Testament that Joseph Smith "translated", although there are presumably more that need translation. Anyway, they usually make more sense, whether you are Mormon or not.
http://scriptures.lds.org/en/jst/7

Being Mormon myself, I agree with thought #2.

Personally, I also fully believe that the Bible is the word of God. But I think their are slight mistakes. For example Jesus wasn't the son of God...in fact, he didn't exist at all...that was a typo during translation. Also the garden of eden and the creation, little mistake happened, they actually meant to describe the big bang and evolution, without any interference of God.

Originally posted by Gregory
You just called an atheist who dislikes many of the teachings of Paul a Paul-worshiper. Tell me, do you wake up in the morning and say, "Today, I'm going to make an idiot of myself," or does it just sort of happen?

It just sort of happens.

Shut up. 😠 😛

Re: Chick Tracts and the Bible why the discrimination?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why is Jack Chick so hated? I know what it is: Jack Chick made a tract that addressed the issue of homosexuality. I posted it and that is when all of the controversy started. The name of the tract is "Gay Blade." Chick.com is the name of the site. Don't go to this site unless you want your sacred cow to be kicked over. Jack Chick's tracts are Bible-based and Christ-centered. Jack's tracts are in numerous foreign languages and are designed to cover many areas of human experience. But the focus is on informing humanity of their sin problem. Jack Chick vividly takes you on a journey through his short stories aimed at capturing your attention. Jack' Chick's tracts draw you into many, varied scenarios all with a central message: all are sinners in need of the Savior. If Jack Chick's tracts offend anyone rest assured that is not his intent. The last thing that Jack wants to do is offend anyone. What would be the benefit of that? Don't let the short stories rub you the wrong way. Let the seed of God's Word concerning Jesus Christ and salvation from sin sink into your heart.

Just find your language and then click on the comic that you wish to read.

I promise you will not regret it!!

http://www.chick.com/catalog/TractLookUp.asp

http://www.chick.com/information/general/salvation.asp

JIA These comics are really BAD, if not the product of evil intent.

Jack T. Chick is an Omega-Level troll.

I agree, more people should read Jack Chick

Nothing will put a worse taste for Christianity in your mouth...

Originally posted by inimalist
I agree, more people should read Jack Chick

Nothing will put a worse taste for Christianity in your mouth...

...while making you laugh.

Do love how the angel of death is ghetto-esque now saying "Wassup".

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1111/1111_01.asp