Onslaught and Darkseid Vs Thanos and Silver Surfer

Started by quanchi11212 pages

Originally posted by darthgoober
You never actually saw him do anything in the Infinity War(I just meant that it happened sometime during that arc). Confusion about it often arises because when Thanos was talking about Omega he said that he attained Galactus's DNA during the Magus/Infinity Gauntlet affair.
ah ok.

thanks for the update.

Originally posted by quanchi112
current ds has not owned mordru. first off mordru didnt know who he was facing and this happened in an alternate timeline. get ur facts straight buddy boy. whoa highfather the guy who is his equal. what a feat that is.

the lords of chaos fear desaad i believe who was impersonating darkseid at the time.

i dont really think the lords of chaos are that great at all anyways for fearing a skyfather.

😆


Still Thanos hasn't done anything comparable you fail.

Originally posted by Estacado
Still Thanos hasn't done anything comparable you fail.
the current ds hasnt done this. so his owning of mordru doesnt pertain to him. how u can u not understand this.

darkseid has never beaten a being as powerful as the beyonder.

thanos punks thor with the power gem while superman punks darkseid straight up. do u see the difference.

Originally posted by quanchi112
thanos punks thor with the power gem

...With a plot device.

Originally posted by Evil_Ash
...With a plot device.
he added to his own person later on. and that isnt the point. he also took everything thor threw at him till he tired of the conflict. that is the difference. superman beat ds under his own power in apokolips now.

Originally posted by quanchi112
the current ds hasnt done this. so his owning of mordru doesnt pertain to him. how u can u not understand this.

darkseid has never beaten a being as powerful as the beyonder.

thanos punks thor with the power gem while superman punks darkseid straight up. do u see the difference.


Idiot can't you understand what highfeats mean?It means Darkseid's feat doesn't matter current or the old one.......
Thanos mindraped Beyonder in his vulnerable form....big deal Ds's telepathy>>>>>Thanos's.

Originally posted by Estacado
Idiot can't you understand what highfeats mean?It means Darkseid's feat doesn't matter current or the old one.......
Thanos mindraped Beyonder in his vulnerable form....big deal Ds's telepathy>>>>>Thanos's.
prove it.

thanos also had a little energy battle with the beyonder as well.

ds telepathy and one of his major feats was an alternate ds. how cant u figure this out.

gds doesnt count.

ur so easy to pawn.

Originally posted by quanchi112
prove it.

thanos also had a little energy battle with the beyonder as well.

ds telepathy and one of his major feats was an alternate ds. how cant u figure this out.

gds doesnt count.

ur so easy to pawn.


There is no alternate Darkseid you idiot there is only 1 since he and Highfather represent the balance of the Source.
Have you even read the book? Thanos mind raped her also......she one shoted Thanos an issue before the mentioned fight so the confrontation can be considered PIS.
PWN?Wake up you failure all you do is talk bullshit.....

Originally posted by quanchi112
thanos created omega a being who was twice as powerful as galactus.

what has ds created that rivals this.

Thats what marvel senses after meeting Omega that has devoured three planets also I would like to comment that the Galactus thats normally encountered is Hungry so thats mean:

A hungry Galactus << Three times dinner Omega

Originally posted by quanchi112
the end is canon. it was referenced in thanos series.

try and keep up.

k,thanks.

Instead of dedicating your time to sounding like an ignorant little muppet, you should really do some actual research before you spew half-truths...cause you don't seem know the first thing about what you're talking about.

'Marvel Universe: The End' has explicitly been stated to be out-of-continuity, by Marvel editors. Something I argued against, vehemently, with Andy Schmidt at another board, but to no avail...but in the end, (no pun intended), it does make sense. Some of what went on in that story absolutely should NOT be canon.

Marvel's official line is that something similar to that story was supposed to have occurred, (which is what Thanos would be referring to in the first issue of his series). The exact particulars are unknown to us...and until they are known as solid fact, it is extremely idiotic of you to continue using what he did in 'The End', as a feat.

In fact, I also believe it's against the rules to cite Elsewords/What-if type stories in your arguments...yet you continue to do it and don't come off looking any smarter in the process.

You're lucky a moderator hasn't caught wind of your shameless rule-breaking, as of yet. 😱

Originally posted by Lord S
Instead of dedicating your time to sounding like an ignorant little muppet, you should really do some actual research before you spew half-truths...cause you don't seem know the first thing about what you're talking about.

'Marvel Universe: The End' has explicitly been stated to be out-of-continuity, by Marvel editors. Something I argued against, vehemently, with Andy Schmidt at another board, but to no avail...but in the end, (no pun intended), it does make sense. Some of what went on in that story absolutely should NOT be canon.

Marvel's official line is that something similar to that story was supposed to have occurred, (which is what Thanos would be referring to in the first issue of his series). The exact particulars are unknown to us...and until they are known as solid fact, it is extremely idiotic of you to continue using what he did in 'The End', as a feat.

In fact, I also believe it's against the rules to cite Elsewords/What-if type stories in your arguments...yet you continue to do it and don't come off looking any smarter in the process.

You're lucky a moderator hasn't caught wind of your shameless rule-breaking, as of yet. 😱

Pwned.

Originally posted by Lord S
Instead of dedicating your time to sounding like an ignorant little muppet, you should really do some actual research before you spew half-truths...cause you don't seem know the first thing about what you're talking about.

'Marvel Universe: The End' has explicitly been stated to be out-of-continuity, by Marvel editors. Something I argued against, vehemently, with Andy Schmidt at another board, but to no avail...but in the end, (no pun intended), it does make sense. Some of what went on in that story absolutely should NOT be canon.

Marvel's official line is that something similar to that story was supposed to have occurred, (which is what Thanos would be referring to in the first issue of his series). The exact particulars are unknown to us...and until they are known as solid fact, it is extremely idiotic of you to continue using what he did in 'The End', as a feat.

In fact, I also believe it's against the rules to cite Elsewords/What-if type stories in your arguments...yet you continue to do it and don't come off looking any smarter in the process.

You're lucky a moderator hasn't caught wind of your shameless rule-breaking, as of yet. 😱

oopp i think my fingers are typing a pm to the mods on there on 😆

Originally posted by Lord S
Instead of dedicating your time to sounding like an ignorant little muppet, you should really do some actual research before you spew half-truths...cause you don't seem know the first thing about what you're talking about.

'Marvel Universe: The End' has explicitly been stated to be out-of-continuity, by Marvel editors. Something I argued against, vehemently, with Andy Schmidt at another board, but to no avail...but in the end, (no pun intended), it does make sense. Some of what went on in that story absolutely should NOT be canon.

Marvel's official line is that something similar to that story was supposed to have occurred, (which is what Thanos would be referring to in the first issue of his series). The exact particulars are unknown to us...and until they are known as solid fact, it is extremely idiotic of you to continue using what he did in 'The End', as a feat.

In fact, I also believe it's against the rules to cite Elsewords/What-if type stories in your arguments...yet you continue to do it and don't come off looking any smarter in the process.

You're lucky a moderator hasn't caught wind of your shameless rule-breaking, as of yet. 😱

HERE IS MY EVIDENCE.

READ IT AND WEEP BOYS, HE SAYS THE HEART AND THAT HE WAS god.

[/IMG]

dont ever step to me again.

i always win.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Pwned.
[/IMG]

PAWNED.

Originally posted by quanchi112
[/IMG]

PAWNED.

And darksied says that he cannot be defeated on the physical plane. 🙄

pwned.

onslaught and darkseid wins this.

sure thanos and silver surfer may be powerful, i'm not denying that. but onslaught and darkseid are something else. onslaught took on the avengers, the fantastic 4 and the xmen all by his lonesome. something thanos nor silver surfer can do. and darkseid would just use his "omega beams" and the "omega effect" would just erase them both...(but i still think that the "omega beams" and the "omega effect" is one of the cheeziest thing ive seen. kinda like an "i win button"😉

Originally posted by quanchi112
[/IMG]

PAWNED.


Though it was mentioned in Thanos mini some of the Marvel handbooks wrote that it's out of continuity.

I've heard that too estacado. Notice he said he was God of 'this reality' and leaving the possibility of other reality's probably meaning DC,Image and others 😖hifty:

Originally posted by quanchi112
HERE IS MY EVIDENCE.

READ IT AND WEEP BOYS, HE SAYS THE HEART AND THAT HE WAS god.

[/IMG]

dont ever step to me again.

i always win.

Oh boy, you're really dense, aren't you? Newsflash: You never win...look around.

Writers can depict whatever they want in comic books, but Marvel has stated that it is out-of-continuity.

Anything with the words 'The End' (Marvel, Wolverine, X-Men, Fantastic Four) attached to it is automatically non-canon...it's common sense.

BTW, 'god' is such a throwaway term...he referred to himself as that during the IG saga as well, and he clearly wasn't at the very top of the food chain. But IG was canon, this was not.

Originally posted by kevdude
I've heard that too estacado. Notice he said he was God of 'this reality' and leaving the possibility of other reality's probably meaning DC,Image and others 😖hifty:
Exactly...'this reality', meaning that one universe...which was not 616.

Originally posted by Lord S
Oh boy, you're really dense, aren't you? Newsflash: You never win...look around.

Writers can depict whatever they want in comic books, but Marvel has stated that it is out-of-continuity.

Anything with the words 'The End' (Marvel, Wolverine, X-Men, Fantastic Four) attached to it is automatically non-canon...it's common sense.

BTW, 'god' is such a throwaway term...he referred to himself as that during the IG saga as well, and he clearly wasn't at the very top of the food chain. But IG was canon, this was not.

Exactly...'this reality', meaning that one universe...which was not 616.

uhm so thanos series did not happen in 616. where is ur proof? mt proof says it happened. ur proof which u have none. u claim to argue with marvel writers. 😆 😆

u are one of the silliest people i have ever meant. a guy who claims he has discussions with marvel writers about all this. 🙄

he ferferred to ig and everything else he did. so why count ig and not the end. u have no answer i win. i have proof while ur proof is that marvel has sais its not canon. show me something official stating this. ur word is worth nothing. i would never believe a guy who says he sopke with writers or editors. sho wme something official or concede ur point if u have one,

i win.

this thanos sereis references ig and the end. u just say the ig counts but everyone who reads this knows they both stand.

get a clue and then get back to me.

💃