Originally posted by PVS
when steel melts and buckles, it sparks. on a grand scale such as the wtc collapse, im sure it was quite a light show.
steel rarely melts in building fires...this was another conspiracy theorists argument...jet fuel burns at 800 but steel doesn't melt until 1300-1400
pity that steel loses 80% of its strength at about 600 though
Originally posted by debbiejo
I will NOT watch any of, nor did watch any of that tragedy.........I will not relive it again.........we must move on.
the only thing is thats impossible to do if we dont hold the true culprits accountable for their actions.Like Robtard said,history has a tendency to repeat itself especially if no accountability is held for the the true culprits.
Originally posted by jaden101
conspiracy nuts say it was a military plane that hit the south tower cause it had no windowslook...windows
people say it was a missle that hit the pentagon despite hundreds of eye witness testimonies to the contrary...not to mention
plane debris...
infact the whole thing was independantly checked out...including interviews with all the "experts" who said bombs were used etc and who were all either taken out of context or blatently misquoted
Originally posted by nerf warrior
Three thousand people died becasue of the shadow government that runs our world. The American government engineered the whole thing. There were explosives placed throughout the building that caused the building to fall so neatly and allowed for a very quick clean-up to get rid of evidence. The pentagon was a missle and the plane that crashed in the PA was actually loaded with all the passengers and pilots from the other three planes and was then shot down. No one looked into anything because of the emotional toll it took on peoples lives.If you are asking yourself why go read the patriot act and look at all the actions that have occured because of 9/11, the american people just sit and look dumbfounded.
Rember those that died because they were a sacrifice made by our government to secure and strengthen their power.
great post,well done.
Originally posted by Deano
oh wow, one tiny peice of wreckage. mystery over
well it certainly puts some of the more idiotic claims to rest doesn't it
military planes and missles and other such total horseshit
have a read
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html
Originally posted by Alliance
This is absolute bullcrap. You don't have facts. Grow up.
no its not bullcrap.you want facts go to the 9-11 thread in the conspiracy there has been many posts there that prove what he is talking about is true which many people here choose to ignore though.He needs to grow up because YOU dont agree with him? wow thats real mature. 🙄
Originally posted by jaden101
well it certainly puts some of the more idiotic claims to rest doesn't itmilitary planes and missles and other such total horseshit
have a read
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html
The pentagon is more mysterious. Things do NOT line up with the governemtne story.
However, all the WTC crap is total bs. Planes brought those beauties down.
Originally posted by jaden101
well it certainly puts some of the more idiotic claims to rest doesn't itmilitary planes and missles and other such total horseshit
have a read
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html
Dude popular mechanics is a propogation piece for the government,they are the ones that have no facts to back up their claims,THEY are full of horseshit,damn people here need to stop listening to the propogation the government shoves down peoples throats.
The pentagon is more mysterious.
if only another plane had hit it...there would have been a ton of camera crews to capture it just like at the WTC
theorists say a missle hit the pentagon...yet their is photographs of plane wreckage on the grass...mmm
i personally dont really see much of a mystery
what i would like to see is al qaeda's reaction to the people who are trying to denounce their handiwork by attributing it to lizards from outer space that secretly control the world
Originally posted by Deano
oh wow, one tiny peice of wreckage. mystery over
not to mention that jetliners dont look anything like that. 😆 thats planted evidence the pentagon people carried on.alos there were severla cameras acoss at the sheridan hotel and a gas station across the street that photograph the pentagan all the time and could have provided pictures of the plane coming in yet the FBI confiscated them immediately.funny if its a plane like they claim that they wont release the film which would clear up the whole mess.
Originally posted by jaden101
if only another plane had hit it...there would have been a ton of camera crews to capture it just like at the WTCtheorists say a missle hit the pentagon...yet their is photographs of plane wreckage on the grass...mmm
i personally dont really see much of a mystery
what i would like to see is al qaeda's reaction to the people who are trying to denounce their handiwork by attributing it to lizards from outer space that secretly control the world
The photos of the building where the jet airliner crashed dont support the governments theory that a jet hit the building.the wall would have the shape of wings going through it.All it has is a circle shaped hole.No signs of the wings which is very mysterious. well I am not one of those people who think lizards from outer space secretly control the world so that doesnt apply to me.the mystery is there because the photos shown hardly prove it was a jet.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
Dude popular mechanics is a propogation piece for the government,they are the ones that have no facts to back up their claims,THEY are full of horseshit,damn people here need to stop listening to the propogation the government shoves down peoples throats.
of course...the government runs everything that doesnt agree with your retarded conspiracy theories dont they
and you obviously didn't read the page because the investigation were carried out by
Ronald Greeley, director of the Space Photography Laboratory at Arizona State University
Fred E. Culick, professor of aeronautics at the California Institute of Technology
Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California
David Biggs, a structural engineer at Ryan-Biggs Associates and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University/Won-Young Kim (senior research scientist)/Arthur Lerner-Lam (associate director)/Mary Tobin (senior science writer)
Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University.
Ken Hays, executive vice president of Masonry Arts, the Bessemer, Ala.
Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC,
Michael K. Hynes, an airline accident expert who investigated the crash of TWA Flight 800 out of New York City in 1996
Wallace Miller, Somerset County coroner (area where flight 93 was shot down)
National Transportation Safety Board investigator Matthew McCormick.
not only this but these person who was named as supposedly shooting down flight 93 Major Rick Gibney, was actually nowhere near the area according to himself and the person who was actually in the plane with him at the time..Ed Jacoby Jr., the director of the New York State Emergency Management Office.
Even if all those people say that,they fail to mention people like steven Jones.A physics professor at Bringham Young university who many physic professors around the country have praised as well for his work in determining that explosives went off in the towers.I used to respect popular mechanics in the past but around the mid 90's all they did was start propogating government lies which continues today.Matter of fact,steven jones has been suspended recently for speaking the truth about 9-11 and the school is having hearings to get him fired.wow some free country this is,cant even have a different view than the governments own.
Originally posted by jaden101
steel rarely melts in building fires...this was another conspiracy theorists argument...jet fuel burns at 800 but steel doesn't melt until 1300-1400pity that steel loses 80% of its strength at about 600 though
forgive my clumsy description. 'becomes soft from intense heat"....or whatever the proper word is
Originally posted by jaden101
😆 😆 😆 ...just like in the road runner cartoons...the pieces of jet liner do...which i have already posted a picture of
No not just like them,but there would be signs of it.and again those photos as me and deano told you,prove nothing.I can see you cant be reasoned with on this though.