An alternative viewpoint to bring balance (to the force) to the discussion:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5888
As far as I'm concerned it isn't really important what Clinton OR Bush knew pre-9/11. We have a problem NOW. Let's solve it and worry about blame once we've won this war.
Originally posted by docb77
An alternative viewpoint to bring balance (to the force) to the discussion:http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5888
As far as I'm concerned it isn't really important what Clinton OR Bush knew pre-9/11. We have a problem NOW. Let's solve it and worry about blame once we've won this war.
A voice of reason.
Originally posted by docb77
I didn't see it myself. However I am surprised that there aren't more conservative posts in this thread since the interview was on Fox. Where are the Fox Fans?
I'll inch in one thing
Is 100(I think less, but whatever, good concervative statement) Cruise Missiles, most of which didn't hit ANYTHING, the others hitting useless crap, really trying? Al Quada got very strong between 1993-2001, I personally think Clinton should have done more, but we need to finish this war, and not back away as several people want to do =/
well we're busy in iraq now....cause...see....saddam was an evil man who tortured iraqis, and we need to torture iraqis to keep that from happening again...because...see....we were attacked on 911...and although that has absolutley no connection to pre-war iraq, its important because we were attacked. bin lada who?
Originally posted by PVS
well we're busy in iraq now....cause...see....saddam was an evil man who tortured iraqis, and we need to torture iraqis to keep that from happening again...because...see....we were attacked on 911...and although that has absolutley no connection to pre-war iraq, its important because we were attacked. bin lada who?
❌ 🍺
K, thanks for butchering that
well, forgive the sarcasm, and forgive me if i place blame on tbe current administration for compromising our national security at present by KNOWINGLY LYING to bring us to war with a country with no ties whatsoever with the attacks on 911, creating the shithole that was once iraq, and keeping our resources out of afghanistan while we pick a fight with iran and taunt n. korea while thumbing our noses at the u.n...but i do. "you cant play the blame game"yes i can and i did.
rather than attack the enemy, they chose to play god and bring democracy to half a continent at gunpoint. oh, you still think democracy will catch like a 'wildfire'? still buying that rhetoric? the only end to such a grand experiment, the only way to "stay the course" is to dictate over every nation dominated by fundamentalist muslems in the middle east*
**except to the nation WITH ties to the attacks on 9/11....it was all just a mistake, they were duped, no need to look into it...
Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
I'll inch in one thingIs 100(I think less, but whatever, good concervative statement) Cruise Missiles, most of which didn't hit ANYTHING, the others hitting useless crap, really trying? Al Quada got very strong between 1993-2001, I personally think Clinton should have done more, but we need to finish this war, and not back away as several people want to do =/
Thank you for both completely missing the point, and failing to comprehend what transpired during that interview.
Originally posted by PVS
well, forgive the sarcasm, and forgive me if i place blame on tbe current administration for compromising our national security at present by KNOWINGLY LYING to bring us to war with a country with no ties whatsoever with the attacks on 911, creating the shithole that was once iraq, and keeping our resources out of afghanistan while we pick a fight with iran and taunt n. korea while thumbing our noses at the u.n...but i do. "you cant play the blame game"yes i can and i did.rather than attack the enemy, they chose to play god and bring democracy to half a continent at gunpoint. oh, you still think democracy will catch like a 'wildfire'? still buying that rhetoric? the only end to such a grand experiment, the only way to "stay the course" is to dictate over every nation dominated by fundamentalist muslems in the middle east*
**except to the nation WITH ties to the attacks on 9/11....it was all just a mistake, they were duped, no need to look into it...
Still using Sarcasm, I can't tell, it sounds honest enough?
Originally posted by KharmaDog
Thank you for both completely missing the point, and failing to comprehend what transpired during that interview.
Isn't it funny how some people can actually fail to grasp even the simplest things that occur right before their very eyes and ears? I guess it's not funny-haha, but it's certainly 'funny'.
Hell I admit I didn't even watch the thing, I heard it was Clinton idolizing himself, trying to sound smart, don't listen to him. The only thing Clinton "tried" was shoot some Missiles, rather than doing what Bush did, but this thread needed some Fox News Protection, the fact being they arn't Concervative
Originally posted by docb77
An alternative viewpoint to bring balance (to the force) to the discussion:http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5888
As far as I'm concerned it isn't really important what Clinton OR Bush knew pre-9/11. We have a problem NOW. Let's solve it and worry about blame once we've won this war.
Balanced? With articles such as:
The Fairy Tale Democrats - September 25th, 2006
Bill Clinton, Bin Laden, and Hysterical Revisions - September 25th, 2006
Iraq's Role in Terrorism - September 23rd, 2006
The UN's Hollow Words and Bolton's Meaningful Warning - September 22nd, 2006
The Democratic Party and the Jews - September 21st, 2006
The American thinker exposes itself as the trash that it is.
You should be embarrassed to post a link to such a partisan site and claim to post it in order to achieve some sense of balance.
Propaganda like The American Thinker and the fools at FOX have no place in any discussion where intelligence or common sense is required.
The latest KMC example of 'ignorance' is brought to us by Darth Kreiger:
Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Hell I admit I didn't even watch the thing, I heard it was Clinton idolizing himself, trying to sound smart, don't listen to him. The only thing Clinton "tried" was shoot some Missiles, rather than doing what Bush did, but this thread needed some Fox News Protection, the fact being they arn't Concervative
Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Hell I admit I didn't even watch the thing, I heard it was Clinton idolizing himself, trying to sound smart, don't listen to him. The only thing Clinton "tried" was shoot some Missiles, rather than doing what Bush did, but this thread needed some Fox News Protection, the fact being they arn't Concervative
You didn't watch it, but felt as though you could intelligently comment about it? You dear sir, are a fool at best and an idiot at worst.
FOX not conservative? Let me through naive into the mix as well.
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
The latest KMC example of 'ignorance' is brought to us by Darth Kreiger:
K? Do I get a Prize? I'm not being that serious right now, I'm not going to try and relay anything to 10 Liberals, Numbers matter.
Anycraps, to Kharma, Fox has Concervative Programs, and Liberal Programs, as well as sides from both. They're fairer
Originally posted by KharmaDog
You didn't watch it, but felt as though you could intelligently comment about it? You dear sir, are a fool at best and an idiot at worst.FOX not conservative? Let me through naive into the mix as well.
Actually I didn't mention the Program in my first post, I was just talking about Clinton/Fox
Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Anycraps, to Kharma, Fox has Concervative Programs, and Liberal Programs, as well as sides from both. They're fairer
Please list the Liberal content in FOX News. FOx is not fair. Look at the guy who owns it. If you cannot see this simple fact, than discussion with you is pointless.
Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Actually I didn't mention the Program in my first post, I was just talking about Clinton/Fox
To talk about Clinton/FOX in this thread and not watch the link provided (and the main thrust of the thread) is either willful ignorance or just plain stupidity.
Originally posted by KharmaDog
Please list the Liberal content in FOX News. FOx is not fair. Look at the guy who owns it. If you cannot see this simple fact, than discussion with you is pointless.To talk about Clinton/FOX in this thread and not watch the link provided (and the main thrust of the thread) is either willful ignorance or just plain stupidity.
Many of the anchors are Liberal, not to mention they show both sides of stories. "Guy who owns it" has no effect, he just wants money, CNN, the most Liberal news, lets Glenn Beck have a show on it, how odd
If you look at who I quoted in my first post, you will see why, please stop making an ass of yourself 🍺