Originally posted by FishyWe would be better off without prisons because there are no isolated people. No isolated people means everyone can change society for the beeter. I mean, imagine if Isac Newton was put in prison. His life would've changed and that would hold science back. Or how about if Darwin was put in prison? Maybe me saying we'd be better off might sound kinda dumb because I'm not very good with words.
Well you still haven't explained why Holland and England would be better off without prisons... I'd like to know too
Originally posted by lord xyz
We would be better off without prisons because there are no isolated people. No isolated people means everyone can change society for the beeter. I mean, imagine if Isac Newton was put in prison. His life would've changed and that would hold science back. Or how about if Darwin was put in prison? Maybe me saying we'd be better off might sound kinda dumb because I'm not very good with words.
Yes I completely agree, because both of those people were murderers and rapists who tried to hurt everybody... Of course keeping criminals out of society is bad.
Prisons are necessary of course they can be based on bringing people back into society as well functioning non killing non raping people, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't have prisons at all....