The Republicans cannot be trusted to run the US Government!

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
what does that have to do with him being VP?

He's an idiot for shooting someone is the face.

An accient.jm

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
How is that relevent to his job?

What does the VICE F******* PRESIDENT shooting a guy in the face have anything to do with him being vp? You truly think there's nothing wrong with that?

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
An accident. JM

That doesn't change the fact he's still an idiot.

Originally posted by Darth Macabre
You truly think there's nothing wrong with that?

Only if he did it on purpose.

I'm just shaking my head as I read those last few posts.

1- Clinton's affair had nothing to do with his ability to govern, but then again, neither did Cheney's hunting accident.

2- I'd still like someone to explain to me how Bush lied. He told us what he believed to be true. Since when is that a lie? He may have been wrong, but I've always thought that lies were deliberate.

3- As far as whether or not Clinton assaulted a woman... Who knows? What is in evidence is that the Lewinsky thing wasn't the only misconduct he was accused of. Shall we list a few, Flowers, That chick with the nose, then outside of the realm of sexual misconduct we have whitewater, and other such stuff.

yeah, I'm still thinking I trust Bush more than Clinton. That said, I wish he'd stop using the stupid "trust me" line, explain his actions once in a while.

In your view maybe you think he is stupid but he is not.^Argee with this post above me through.Got to get ready for bed.Night.jmsleep1

Originally posted by Darth Macabre
What does the VICE F******* PRESIDENT shooting a guy in the face have anything to do with him being vp? You truly think there's nothing wrong with that?

Yeah, its a horrible accident but it has nothing to do with his job, does it?

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Yeah, its a horrible accident but it has nothing to do with his job, does it?

It has everything to do with the job...If I did that to someone I sure as hell wouldn't be let off scott free, now would I?...

Edit: I took what you said from a different point of view; I thought you were saying something different.

Originally posted by Darth Macabre
It has everything to do with the job...If I did that to someone I sure as hell wouldn't be let off scott free, now would I?...

You sure would if it was an accident.

Originally posted by docb77

2- I'd still like someone to explain to me how Bush lied. He told us what he believed to be true. Since when is that a lie? He may have been wrong, but I've always thought that lies were deliberate.

How do you know what he believed to be true?

Originally posted by Darth Macabre
It has everything to do with the job...If I did that to someone I sure as hell wouldn't be let off scott free, now would I?...

Legally, maybe. But you shouldn't be fired because of something that happened outside of work that had nothing to do with work.

Originally posted by Lana
How do you know what he believed to be true?

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Legally, maybe. But you shouldn't be fired because of something that happened outside of work that had nothing to do with work.

We never said "fired".

Originally posted by Lana
How do you know what he believed to be true?

because bush pisses rainbows and craps sunshine. he could never tell a lie. these people are so brainwashed that they could catch bush selling their mothers' heisted organs over the internet and find some way to justify it.

Originally posted by RocasAtoll
We never said "fired".

Or even punished at work at all.

Originally posted by PVS
because bush pisses rainbows and craps sunshine. he could never tell a lie. these people are so brainwashed that they could catch bush selling their mothers' heisted organs over the internet and find some way to justify it.

But the thing about it is, he would not do it, he has Morals, and that Lady's and Gentlemen(and Liberals) closes your point

And to Iraq, the same reasons you have for not going in apply to Nazi Germany, they did not declare war on us, they did not attack us, yet do you think the World is worse off for us invading them?

Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
But the thing about it is, he would not do it, he has Morals, and that Lady's and Gentlemen(and Liberals) closes your point

And to Iraq, the same reasons you have for not going in apply to Nazi Germany, they did not declare war on us, they did not attack us, yet do you think the World is worse off for us invading them?

Morals? Are you serious?

They declared war on us idiot.

Originally posted by RocasAtoll
Morals? Are you serious?

They declared war on us idiot.

Yes Morals

Actually they didn't, but ok, WE declared War on them after Pearl Harbor, which was done by Japan, who did not really have a Formal Alliance with Germany

Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Yes Morals

Actually they didn't, but ok, WE declared War on them after Pearl Harbor, which was done by Japan, who did not really have a Formal Alliance with Germany

Ya, they did. Germany declared war on us. Get over it.

Originally posted by RocasAtoll
They declared war on us idiot.

😆 That was great!

Originally posted by Darth Kreiger
Yes Morals

Actually they didn't, but ok, WE declared War on them after Pearl Harbor, which was done by Japan, who did not really have a Formal Alliance with Germany

Actually, Hitler declared war on us on December 11th. 3 days after we declared war on the Nips.