'Heart of the Force' clearly translates into great strength in The Force.
Think of the Exile, we all know that she was a hole in The Force, and Kreia describes looking into her eyes as looking into The Death of the Force.
In other words, Kreia sensed the lack of the force in the Exile, and thus described her as the death of the force, as she was living proof that the force could be destroyed.
Now by describing looking into Revan's eyes as looking into The Heart of the Force, the most likely explanation is that he has the greatest force presence and was the strongest in the force that she had ever met.
Even if it translates great strength in the force, Palpatine is said to be THE Darkside himself.. Kinda beats out the 1st one.
Oh yes, I know. I was just stating that Revan being described as such probably translates into that.
Now as a Jedi, Revan COULD be more powerful than Sidious or Sidious' equal.
Oh I doubt that.
Since Sidious is Yoda's equal at his worst and Yoda is above Revan, I doubt that
Yoda's above Revan? Since when?
Yoda has...dismantled droid armies, has had 'legion' of triumphs over the Dark Side, his ability to bind the Dark Side alone, lifted the temple of Ilum, blocked force lightning with his bare hands...
"He, the fiercest, strongest, most implacable foe the darkness had ever known.' Btw, and his direct reference to the most powerful Jedi the Order had produced in the AOTC novel....Dark Rendevous, too
Lightsnake nobody is arguing about this novelization, but what makes you think that it's not possible Revan could have been just as strong as Yoda? I don't know if this quote included EU but even if it didn't, it's possible that judging by Revan's path, he might have been as strong as Yoda, at his peak.
Why wouldn't it? In an EU source, if it says one thing, then that's what it is. Why wouldn't it include all of the EU? It's not a pick and choose.
In the ROTS novelization-and I've told you this before- we have Ventress, Boz Pity, Saluecami, Haruun Kal, Vaapad, Darth Bane, Grievous's crimes, among others...it's also G-canon, meaning it's a higher level than another EU source
Actually Novelizations arn't G-Canon, as they interfere with the movies. Oh and btw, the only G-Canon is stuff created by Lucas.
Lightsnake, you are terrible at debating, you accuse me of Hypocracy, but you are the only one practicing it.
Another thing "he never had a reason to" has to be the WORST point I've ever heard spoken.
Actually, novelizations are g-canon and are approved by GL rather personally. You override the canon policy now?
Oh, and when would Bane be collapsing temples when he was at Korriban? Does that mean we should discount yoda's saber skills because he never uses them at Dagobah? Maybe because Mace doesn't periodically sue Vaapad to slaughter bystanders he's weaker?
Bane happened to use the move when he actually HAD to, what's your point?
Originally posted by Lightsnake
Actually, novelizations are g-canon and are approved by GL rather personally. You override the canon policy now?Oh, and when would Bane be collapsing temples when he was at Korriban? Does that mean we should discount yoda's saber skills because he never uses them at Dagobah? Maybe because Mace doesn't periodically sue Vaapad to slaughter bystanders he's weaker?
Bane happened to use the move when he actually HAD to, what's your point?
So despite the MASSIVE contradictions inside them, you say they're G-Canon, they're not.
And the rest is you spewing out random shit.....you arn't making any point, at all