freedon nadd vs count dooku
ok i know that we dont know much about nadd and technically he is an unknown but the reason i made this thread is that because he did things as a spirit, like pushed vodo and pulled a avalanche or rocks on exar kun,
well what do you think? in terms of force power and saber combat against dooku.
and yesss i foresee.. rampant ox!
Well Freedon Nadd is pretty much an unknown, but judging by what he could do as a spirit (instakilling a weak King Ommin, force pushing Voda, a strong jedi master from halfway across the galaxy), the fact that he knew ancient sith magic (all the stuff from Naga Sadow, possibly Adas' holocron) and there's also the chance that he might have killed Naga Sadow, pretty impressive. Darth Bane also did get the orbalisk armour from his tomb, so there's always the chance that Nadd was in possesion of them.
hmm, well bane did that after Pod, he went into nadds tomb, if nadd could do things as a spirit, push vodo from a different part of the galaxy, make an avalanche to pin exar kun down, imagine what he could do in his physical form, we cant say how strong he isthough, only 1 quote from zuka in kotor saying "he was far worse than revan and malak everwere".
sith spirits tend to weaken as time passes on and nadd was a spirit for 400 years until he died by the hands of exar kun, and still he could do the things we just mentioned,
anyways how did he conquer onderon?
o ya kas'im lol you might want to get a avatar of a twilek jedi since that what kasim is in pod lol
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Your sarcasm about me not having an argument shows you didn't read the other 3-4 posts that said the exact same thing, which shows you lack reading comprehension. Thank you, come again.
Did you not care to think that perhaps I had read every single post, yet just wanted to pick on yours? Also, bad reading comprehension has nothing to do with not reading something, just failing to interpret and evaluate the text properly, that's all. Thank you, come again.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Once again...
Reading comprehension can be defined as the level of understanding of a passage or text.
I rest my case, keep trying though.
Great, so you can define what reading comprehension is without applying it to what I said.
Prove just how I displayed bad understanding of a passage or text. Can't, can you?
Originally posted by Kas'Im
Great, so you can define what reading comprehension is without applying it to what I said.
Prove just how I displayed bad understanding of a passage or text. Can't, can you?
You can say that "Oh I just wanted to pick on you". That just makes you seem dumber than people initially realized, after already assuming that you have bad reading comprehension from the post you made.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
You can say that "Oh I just wanted to pick on you". That just makes you seem dumber than people initially realized, after already assuming that you have bad reading comprehension from the post you made.
Was that your proof? Wow.
You see I could do the same and just say that you have bad reading comprehension, but without an explanation, that statement means jack td.
So again, explain how I failed in evaluating any post in this thread and I'll accept that I displayed bad reading comprehension skills. Until then, you'll just have to accept that you're wrong in this case.