Originally posted by Darth Subjekt
i didnt hea that from lightsnake. For one its on Wikipedia, and in a magazine interview.
The quote goes as follows:
Originally posted by Advent
"He tries it with anybody he thinks might be more powerful, which is what the Emperor was looking for in the first place: somebody who would be more powerful than he was and could help him rule the universe. But Obi-Wan screwed that up by cutting off his arms and legs and burning him up. From then on, he wasn't as strong as the Emperor-- he was like Darth Maul or Count Dooku. He wasn't what he was supposed to become. But the son could become that."-- George Lucas, Rolling Stones, June 2, 2005.
Taking that quote:
What was Anakin suppose to become? The most powerful Force user, correct?
Answer: Yes.
Now, Luke is suppose to become what that Anakin didn't due to the Mustafar incident? The most powerful Force user, correct?
Answer: Yes.
So, does this necessarily imply potential? No, Lucas has never stated that Anakin at his full potential would be equal to Luke at his, all he's saying is that either: a) Luke could become the most powerful, or b) Luke is more powerful than Sidious. Take your pick as you can make an argument for b, but I don't so much agree with it as I do a.
Potential is not stated. It's not friggin' fact, however, I'd concede it means that Luke can now become the most powerful (since Anakin's potential is down the drain), but does it mean they have equal potential for definite - as in there can be no objection?
Answer: Hell no.
JUST RAPE LIGHTELEMENT AGAIN IM SURE THE ANGER WILL BE GONE
Yeah, sure I'll rape him, but you'll probably be watching it and salivating with pleasure. You wish you had a p*nis so you could make him s*ck it. I am guessing you stole an extra one of our dad, who has a dozen of them. You know what, you're a loser who has no life. I am not going to bother arguing with you.