Originally posted by King KAM
okay okay god...ill post some damn scans....
No please dont! Because I can see you're pissed off. I dont want yoiu to put down some scans if you dont really want to. I would prefer it if you did not bother.
Im just saying that sometimes you wind me up a bit, its not that important.
Originally posted by Alfheimthere i posted some...and they rock yeah yeah i know...
No please dont! Because I can see you're pissed off. I dont want yoiu to put down some scans if you dont really want to. I would prefer it if you did not bother.Im just saying that sometimes you wind me up a bit, its not that important.
that's an impressive sig, pittman. 🙂 what is ss wearing?
and yeah, i think some of the . . . honesty in this thread has dwindled some. but, people ARE rating people at debating in the threads that are their . . . specialty, so the scores WILL be high. some people know certain characters inside-out and are the only ones they debate. should the specialists be 'punished' because they don't or only rarely debate other characters? i don't know . . . maybe switch to letter grades?
A's=overall knowledge and ability to debate
B's=specialist-tyoes who don't stray from certain characters
C's=average debaters whether specialists or general debators
D's=just not very good in general but improving . . .
F's=???
(what else -- FANBOYS!!) 😱
oh, and pittman, i'm afraid i can't fairly rate you because i've not seen you post in a long while. 🙁 sorry bro.
Originally posted by leonidasJust because you have speciality character doesn't equate to a good debater. You can have alot of knowledge and scans on someone but if you don't know how to use them then your still not a good debater.
that's an impressive sig, pittman. 🙂 what is ss wearing?and yeah, i think some of the . . . honesty in this thread has dwindled some. but, people ARE rating people at debating in the threads that are their . . . specialty, so the scores WILL be high. some people know certain characters inside-out and are the only ones they debate. should the specialists be 'punished' because they don't or only rarely debate other characters? i don't know . . . maybe switch to letter grades?
A's=overall knowledge and ability to debate
B's=specialist-tyoes who don't stray from certain characters
C's=average debaters whether specialists or general debators
D's=just not very good in general but improving . . .
F's=???
(what else -- FANBOYS!!) 😱
oh, and pittman, i'm afraid i can't fairly rate you because i've not seen you post in a long while. 🙁 sorry bro.
Leo you get
8.5 😛
Originally posted by Galan007I'll give you a 6.5/10
When you debate it's normally a well thought out, and solid argument.I'd give you an 8.8
Your a better debater than most but I don't really ever see you owning other good people but then again I know you can get your points across better than most but until you actually go in and own a good debater I'm sorry your just a little above average
Originally posted by DarkCrawler7.7/10
7.5 - 8 for Newjak...you've been on tourneys and some big debates, but then again I haven't seen you debate much.
Although a 7.8 on my scale is still really good.
Here let me explain.
If your a really good debater then you get 8.1-10 these are the higher up guys best on the board.
A 6.6-8 is the mid-tier debaters they are good and can own the average debater pretty well but you don't quite reach the top.
A 4.5-6.5 ia an average guy. These are the bulk of the debaters here and they defentlyaren't bad but nothing special.
0-4.4 Well these are the the people that aren't that good. Their posts are hard to make sense of and they often make outragious claims and or they often resort to name calling.
Originally posted by Newjak
7.7/10
Your defently better than the norm around here and you can come up with very sound arguements and you own the average debater pretty easily but you don't quite hold up to the higher ups here.Although a 7.8 on my scale is still really good.
Here let me explain.
If your a really good debater then you get 8.1-10 these are the higher up guys best on the board.
A 6.6-8 is the mid-tier debaters they are good and can own the average debater pretty well but you don't quite reach the top.
A 4.5-6.5 ia an average guy. These are the bulk of the debaters here and they defentlyaren't bad but nothing special.
0-4.4 Well these are the the people that aren't that good. Their posts are hard to make sense of and they often make outragious claims and or they often resort to name calling.
Who would you say are really good debaters?