Originally posted by carver9
I'm not even talking about this any more because ironman made it to the sun in like one to two panels and it took superman at least 5 or 6 panels to make it to the sun. We have no time but if we go by panels, Ironman was faster and I know for a fact that Ironman cant even combat at the speed of sound or fly on earth past mach 10.Rogue flew at a much more farther distance than Superman and made it back home on the same day which would mean going by your standards that she is at least a couple of thousands past the speed of light.
I'm not debating this anymore, I will let you have it because your mind is made up but I would still love to see those combat speed feats where he is moving at the speed of light.
But there's no trail behind Ironman that indicates he got there very fast and despite your claim of his making it to the sun in two panels, you still didn't show before and after he flew to it.
I wish you could be a little more descriptive than that. Saying something like that happened in one day is not enough.
Just refer to his fight with Wonder Woman and Darkseid.
Originally posted by Kirikaze Fuuma
With more knowledge about fighting than you.Try again.
Originally posted by Astner
People seem to misinterpret the Burden of Proof fallacy, in turn committing the Argument from Fallacy fallacy.Claiming falsehood of a claim, based on the lack of sufficient evidence is just as bad as suggesting that it's true. "The lack of evidence is not the evidence of absence."
Originally posted by Kirikaze Fuuma
He stated it. Unless you think DBZ characters are stupid people who don't know their own capabilities.
How many times has a character said" Wha... what? impossible"
Or challenged a vastly stronger character only to be beaten in 1 hit
Or made hyperbolic claims that were immediately disproven
Originally posted by Astner
Read what I wrote.
Exchange sufficient evidence for any evidence at all
Originally posted by Gecko4lif
Exchange sufficient evidence for any evidence at all
If you want to prove that something isn't true, you'll have to prove that.
Denoting logical fallacies doesn't disprove the claim, it simply refutes the argument. A claim supported by a fallacious argument can still be true.
Originally posted by Gecko4lif
Besides the fact that they are?How many times has a character said" Wha... what? impossible"
Or challenged a vastly stronger character only to be beaten in 1 hit
Or made hyperbolic claims that were immediately disproven
Means you're saying that they are stupid enough.
Something similar can be found anywhere.
LOL you mean Satan?
Oh, if you really want to know what hyperbole is...
source : http://www.onemanga.com/Captain_Tsubasa_-_World_Youth/52/068/
You know what happened next...
Originally posted by Astner
No. What I wrote was that you--by suggesting that a claim is untrue because due to the lack of evidence--are committing the Argument from Fallacy fallacy.If you want to prove that something isn't true, you'll have to prove that.
Denoting logical fallacies doesn't disprove the claim, it simply refutes the argument. A claim supported by a fallacious argument can still be true.
Originally posted by Kirikaze Fuuma
Means you're saying that they are stupid enough.Something similar can be found anywhere.
LOL you mean Satan?
probably some other people im forgetting
Originally posted by Kirikaze Fuuma
Oh, if you really want to know what hyperbole is...source : http://www.onemanga.com/Captain_Tsubasa_-_World_Youth/52/068/
You know what happened next...
Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
no, its only fallacious if the claim is that something is absolutely invalid due to lack of evidence.
Differentiate claim from argument, because they're not the same.