Originally posted by Kaled
yeah, but more people who say sephiroth who have played them both
Well again, if you want to go just by popularity that's your choice, it's an empty avenue, though, meaningless. Plus how would you know more people say sephiroth who have played them both?
Originally posted by Kaled
Kefka didn't manage to do anythink to the world when he was a god, he just killed things on it. Sephiroth was this close to annihilating it, the planet, not just the stuff on it
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought you said earlier that you didn't even play FFVI? And now you're acting as though you did. Kefka scorched the earth, he turned into into a wasteland. This affected the very world itself.
Originally posted by Kaled
it means they tried to make sepiroth of appropriate difficulty. But the point stilll stands, if he has all his powers you should use the strongest point, otherwise its just plain dodging
Apparantly they tried and failed if he was easier to defeat for people at a lower level, that's the opposite of appropriate difficulty. No dodging is occuring, learn the terms before you use them. Kefka was always an appropriate difficulty, he was easier to defeat at a higher level, as he should be, but he was always a challenge.
Originally posted by Kaled
well you could argue cloud was a better hero, who took the initiative to stop sephiroth before he did anything
Cloud has nothing to do with the discussion. This is Kefka vs Sephiroth and nothing more. Besides, again, you're acting as if you've played FFVI by passing judgement on the characters in the game when you've never played it.
Originally posted by Kaled
hope? sephiroth?? er, no no no. There was never any changing sephiroth, he saw what power was, and nothing was going to stop him.
Hope in that he wasn't always a bad person. He was once good and just lost it. Kefka was always evil, from the very start. Kefka was the epitome of cruelty and malace at all times.
Originally posted by Kaled
Ok, let me point something out that i'l certain you'l retailate to, but sephiroth has a far largr selection of moves, most of his best attacks are improvements from Kefka's. Although theres Super nova and heartless angel that could wipe Kefka out, i'm more concerned with Pale Horse, causes all status effects in the book, confusion, paralize, poisen, silence......Dark flare too, unavoidable and lethal..in terms of ablities sephiroth has far more at hand to KefkaOh if you deciede to bring god-hood into it don't if he got killed in the game he can get killed here, Safer Sephiroth's power transcends godhood
Bosses are immune to status effects, so Pale Horse is worthless against Kefka. Also, bosses are immune to attacks that drain health down to a specific amount or are one hit kills. So both would be immune to eachothers super move.
Regardless, I've never been arguing that Kefka could "beat" Sephiroth. Though I think he could, not through pure power, but through cunning and deceipt. I've been arguing purely about which I think is the better villain, when it comes to acts, personality, plot and so on.