Cyclops versus Havok

Originally posted by Soljer
Not necessarily - I hate how people always make that assumption.

Just because they can't directly affect each other doesn't mean they can't shoot out the support collumn that's holding all those tons of cement up. Doesn't mean they can't shoot through the floor. Doesn't mean they can't cause some sort of avalanche, burying their brother.

That's a better question - we know Cyke has the upperhand in close quarters - could Alex show more creativity than Cyclops?

Yes, kudos for thinking of this. Many people tend to just let this theory slide, even though it's very important.

However, Scott still THRASHES Alex no matter what.

He's a FAR better fighter, FAR more creative, FAR more strategic/better tactician, has the fastest attack speed, etc., etc.

Scott wins 8/10, in my opinion.

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Yes, kudos for thinking of this. Many people tend to just let this theory slide, even though it's very important.

However, Scott still THRASHES Alex no matter what.

He's a FAR better fighter, FAR more creative, FAR more strategic/better tactician, has the fastest attack speed, etc., etc.

Scott wins 8/10, in my opinion.

Uhhh...What of this stat boosting that some are claiming Havok can manage? I wouldn't put Scott so far ahead....

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Yes, kudos for thinking of this. Many people tend to just let this theory slide, even though it's very important.

However, Scott still THRASHES Alex no matter what.

He's a FAR better fighter, FAR more creative, FAR more strategic/better tactician, has the fastest attack speed, etc., etc.

Scott wins 8/10, in my opinion.