Originally posted by breeze85
You are so, so out of your league now.
Go read something about the icebergs: http://www.wordplay.com/tourism/icebergs/
One of my favourite picks: "How hard is iceberg ice?
The crushing strength of ice is around 1% that of steel or 10% that of concrete. Though this may not sound very hard, a ship collision with an iceberg would surely end in disaster. The enormous momentum involved and potentially huge contact area with the ice can generate hundreds of tonnes of force on the hull which would cause it to dent and crumple."
That's why the Titanic sank. If the icebergs were even partially consisted of denser-than-steel ice they would sink like stones. Even though they aren't STILL only 10% of them remains visible above the surface. And no, there is no ice even nearly as dense as steel anywhere. At depths below 60-70 meters the ice has already changed into fluid ice due to its own weight. Now show us where do we have these icebergs possessing the strength and density of steel? As said, average is 1/100 of steel's strength. Density a lot higher of course but certainly not matching that of steel.
Yep the smaller particles would indeed break on Maestro, not the big ones possessing enough mass and also density to some degree.
A man slamming concrete and tiles apart doesn't break his arm because...? I give you a hint: it's not because of his hand having a higher density.
Hey "Clownie". You are proving my point.
First, I never said that icebergs were as hard as the steel in the hull of a ship. I just meant that under certain conditions, they are as strong as steel. Some type of steel.
Second, as you said, an iceberg is not as dense as the hull of a ship. Ok. Here comes the ship (DD/Supes) moving fast (Speedblitzing) toward an ice berg (Maestro) that is less dense than the hull.
What happens to that hull?
Get it?