Justice League Heroes

Originally posted by Darth Vicious
Regular controllers? No new features to them?

It has the tilt-sensing technology.

Which is why it's called the SIXAXIS controller now.

However as Grimm22 stated, it's a slight copy of the Nintendo Wii.

Sony's obviously going the safe route by having the best of both worlds from the competitors.

You can get the online service (which looks remarkably good considering the Linux system) and the gimmicky motion-sensing technology.

They absolutely did copy it. However, from a business standpoint it was a smart thing to do.

There's no such thing as "that's not fair!" or "cheater" in business....unless it violates anti-trust laws...which they didn't.

I think is too expensive as $500 and $600. The only game im really looking forward to is the new Metal Gear and Resident Evil 5 but RE will be for the 360 too.

The $600 version is worthless. The only extra features are more harddrive space and a memory card reader for digital cameras.

Which means the $500 is a far better choice.

If it's too expensive, than obviously wait for the price to go down. And down it will go eventually.

Originally posted by Grimm22
I wouldnt hate Sony so much if they would just stop being a bunch of a**holes.

Seriously, all they have done so far with the PS3 is copy their competitors.

Motion sensor controllers - Nintendo
Online Service - Microsoft

I have yet to see Sony pull out anything new.

And they took out the rumble controllers! 😠

Online is something that is a standard that all gamers want their consoles to rise up to. I agree on the controller somewhat, but why isn't nintendo putting their games in Cartridges anymore? Hmmm....

Originally posted by Grimm22
Oh well, we dont need any of those bastards 😛 😄

Even if that was true 😐

PS2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS3 😉

Sony has taken a crap on the gaming industry

and they are going to pay for it by losing the console wars to Nintendo ✅

Originally posted by Draco69
I don't know WHY people want the Xbox to win. Microsoft = Monopoly. Jesus, they're already trying to take over the Ipod market with their Zune.

Do you all REALLY want Microsoft to dominate every single market that has to do with electronics....

😐

Originally posted by Grimm22
The PSP actually has good games 😐

Like Burnout, X-men legends, socom, ect..

Its just that the system was so poorly designed that its impossible to play any of these games without hurting your hands.

And now with Metal Gear, JLH, MUA, and MKD they have a pretty descent line up.

Originally posted by Grimm22
I wouldnt hate Sony so much if they would just stop being a bunch of a**holes.

Seriously, all they have done so far with the PS3 is copy their competitors.

Motion sensor controllers - Nintendo
Online Service - Microsoft

I have yet to see Sony pull out anything new.

And they took out the rumble controllers! 😠

Ooooo... heated debate. 😛

While we're on the subject, I think gamers have a right to have negative feelings towards Sony. When they produce shit like this:

Hell yes, people (myself included) are going to get pissed off. It's almost like they want people to refuse to buy their products.

Originally posted by H. S. 6
Ooooo... heated debate. 😛

While we're on the subject, I think gamers have a right to have negative feelings towards Sony. When they produce shit like this:

Hell yes, people (myself included) are going to get pissed off. It's almost like they want people to refuse to buy their products.

Originally posted by H. S. 6
Ooooo... heated debate. 😛

While we're on the subject, I think gamers have a right to have negative feelings towards Sony. When they produce shit like this:

Hell yes, people (myself included) are going to get pissed off. It's almost like they want people to refuse to buy their products.

... What exactly is your problem with data on the chart?

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
... What exactly is your problem with data on the chart?

Well, let's see...

I'd forgotten you had to buy the hard drive to play the games. Hmm, and I seem to also have forgotten that you had to buy a second wireless controller for the 360, but you don't have to for the PS3. Silly me. Lookie here! I couldn't remember that I was required to buy an HD-DVD drive, and a 12 month Xbox Live subscription.

And boy, I always thought there was a $399 system that includes the hard drive and the wireless controller. Guess I was wrong.

Boy, my memory's going. 🙄

Originally posted by H. S. 6
Well, let's see...

I'd forgotten you had to buy the hard drive to play the games. Hmm, and I seem to also have forgotten that you had to buy a second wireless controller for the 360, but you don't have to for the PS3. Silly me. Lookie here! I couldn't remember that I was required to buy an HD-DVD drive, and a 12 month Xbox Live subscription.

And boy, I always thought there was a $399 system that includes the hard drive and the wireless controller. Guess I was wrong.

Boy, my memory's going. 🙄

Originally posted by H. S. 6
Ooooo... heated debate. 😛

While we're on the subject, I think gamers have a right to have negative feelings towards Sony. When they produce shit like this:

Hell yes, people (myself included) are going to get pissed off. It's almost like they want people to refuse to buy their products.

Again.

Where's the lies?

Nothing is infactual about it.

😕

Originally posted by Draco69
Again.

Where's the lies?

Nothing is infactual about it.

😕

Read my post again.

😕

As for JLH are there specials like X-men legends 2. I just bought it yesterday and played it a little but I dont plan on beating it until I visit my brother.

Originally posted by H. S. 6
Well, let's see...

I'd forgotten you had to buy the hard drive to play the games. Hmm, and I seem to also have forgotten that you had to buy a second wireless controller for the 360, but you don't have to for the PS3. Silly me. Lookie here! I couldn't remember that I was required to buy an HD-DVD drive, and a 12 month Xbox Live subscription.

And boy, I always thought there was a $399 system that includes the hard drive and the wireless controller. Guess I was wrong.

Boy, my memory's going. 🙄

Noooo....

The comparision was between the CORE system of the Xbox 360 and the CORE system of the Playstation 3 on which had more REAL value.

You didn't HAVE to get the HDDVD Drive for the Xbox 360. But the PS3 already has it in it.

The Core system didn't come with wireless controllers. They came with wired ones. So if you want a wireless controller, you have to buy one. However the PS3 already comes with one.

You don't HAVE to buy the subscription...but the PS3's online service is free.

It's not saying "nah-nah! We're cheaper!" It's saying "The PS3 gets more bang for buck and is relatively cheaper than the Core System for the Xbox 360."

I don't understand how people could misinterpret something so wrong....

Originally posted by H. S. 6
Read my post again.

😕

Read my bottom post.

And again, is there ANYTHING that's wrong or infactual about it. Did they lie about the price?

No.

They just compared their core system to theirs....

Originally posted by Draco69
Noooo....

The comparision was between the CORE system of the Xbox 360 and the CORE system of the Playstation 3 on which had more REAL value.

You didn't HAVE to get the HDDVD Drive for the Xbox 360. But the PS3 already has it in it.

The Core system didn't come with wireless controllers. They came with wired ones. So if you want a wireless controller, you have to buy one. However the PS3 already comes with one.

You don't HAVE to buy the subscription...but the PS3's online service is free.

It's not saying "nah-nah! We're cheaper!" It's saying "The PS3 gets more bang for buck and is relatively cheaper than the Core System for the Xbox 360."

I don't understand how people could misinterpret something so wrong....

In the chart, it says, "Requires Users to Buy." So, yes, it is completely infactual in that light.

However, I do see what you're saying. But I think you're missing one important point: The 360 gives you the choice to buy what you want, while the PS3 is just there, thus you have to pay $600 for it. You have no other option.

Interesting that Sony fails to mention anything about the premium package for the 360, or the fact that, you know, you're not required to buy any of that, and the system will do its job perfectly--to play games.

Originally posted by H. S. 6
In the chart, it says, "Requires Users to Buy." So, yes, it is completely infactual in that light.

That's not the point of the statement. It states that in order to have all the premium features of next-generation gaming, you're required to buy the following items.

The chart was taken out of context or a larger article...

Originally posted by H. S. 6
However, I do see what you're saying. But I think you're missing one important point: The 360 gives you the choice to buy what you want, while the PS3 is just there, thus you have to pay $600 for it. You have no other option.

The choice is certainly a marketable element found in the Xbox 360. However Sony is about capital and pushing the envelope for next-generation gaming.

The wireless controller which is wiiiiii bit of knockoff is required to play the games.

The Blu-Ray Drive, which is SO misunderstood, is NOT just for movies. It's for the games themselves. The games are held in Blu-Ray Discs which allows nearly 40 to 50 GB worth of storage in comparision to the standard DVD. The game called Lair uses 9GB for ONE level in the game. That's about all you could fit in the DVD even with compression. If you take it out...the PS3 isn't a PS3. It's the friggin' engine for the PS3....

The online service is free so that's a given.

What people don't understand is the Blu-Ray Drive itself. Many people see it as an unecessary movie-watching device. It isn't. It plays the games too.....

Originally posted by H. S. 6
Interesting that Sony fails to mention anything about the premium package for the 360, or the fact that, you know, you're not required to buy any of that, and the system will do its job perfectly--to play games.

Well, of course. It's called advertisement. Show me an Apple Ipod commerical that states that their batteries are irreplaceable and they have to be returned for a hundred bucks. Or a Pepsi commercial that states that Coke tastes just the same as the Coca-Cola.

ALL advertisements withhold or mislead information in order to make their products more appealing. It's nothing new. It's been done for decades. Microsoft has done it. Sony has done it. Hell, the towel called Bounty is advertise in a similar matter in comparision to a "leading brand."

Virtually ALL commericals on your TV do this. Except those annoying prescription ads....