Originally posted by Fatima
critisise the thing you know about it , not talking about something you didnt study or read , and form it as you like , or because you hate it .
So are you claiming Mohammed did not fight wars and did not kill people? That would kinda contradict the Quran now wouldn't it?
Originally posted by Gregory
It's not really clear. "Because the Jewish leadership asked them to" would seem to be the answer you get from the gospels. I think Pilate goes so far as to say that Jesus hasn't actually done anything worthy of crucifixion.
Which would be a semi-good reason actually. The Quran however claims that Jesus wasn't crucified and that seems just as logical if you ask me.
Originally posted by crazy
Yea the hate just pours from lil, anyone else notice it?Btw these sources are as credible as chick tracts.
I agree with lil on a lot of other things, but she's way off on Islam.
Originally posted by RocasAtoll
Where'd that come from?
From about a month of arguments on Islam.
Originally posted by Alliance
Bullshit. You're the one who has no argument, just personal attacks.
I have an argument, it is you who has none.
I have presented my arguments over and over again, but you don't have the knowledge to rebute, so your only thing is ''you are discriminating''
DISPROVE my claims on Islam, or STFU.
Originally posted by AllianceThe Jews and Romans were having a war, the Romans decided that if they kill the king of the Jews, the rest will follow. And what was Jesus claiming to be?
I don't believe there was really much intervention from Rome.I've never really found a good reason. He was a heretic?
Originally posted by FatimaBoth fit the term prophet, if both existed they were human. Without sin and without mistake are two separate concepts. Perfection may not absolutely negate the possibility of mistake. Christ did not tell his parents before leaving the family in his youth and discussing religion with the elders, this may have been a mistake, I am sure my wife and I would considering our sons to have made a mistake if they did similar.
both mohammed and Jesus are prophets ...they are human make amistake .
[list][*]Muhammad was a great man with noble aspirations, I would claim Christ was the same.
[*]Muhammad began a powerful religion that is often misinterpreted by its followers, Christ did the same.
[*]Muhammad was a loving individual, Christ was the same.
[*]Muhammad was carried away in the spirit to view areas, Christ had the same occurrence, albeit Christ was taken by Satan whereas Muhammad was taken by an angel.
[*]Muhammad was a persuasive individual, Christ was also.
[*]Both taught good principles.[/list]
Originally posted by debbiejoIt is if the accusation that is having a denial requested may be considered treason. Christ, if he did not deny, was conceding that the Jew claims that he was the sovereign King of Israel and above the jurisdiction of Caesar were accurate.
Silence doesn't mean anything......
Regardless of the meaning or intent of Christ's silence it satisfied Roman law regarding his crucifixion. It was easier to kill Jesus than it was to deal with a mob of Jewish fanatics. The Romans didn't care whether or not Christ died, killing him would calm the fanatics that were bothering them.