savvysparrow
Senior Member
The thing with the dresses. I think you're very clever to pick up on it, and the sinking wedding dress sequence in DMC, may in fact point to those events in CotBP. It may have been, like the why is the rum always gone line, a way to call the audiences attention back to the events that led to Jack and Elizabeth's introduction.
Certainly, you can look at Jack's rescue as being symbolic on more than one level, if you're of the frame of mind that J/E were meant to be together for quite a while.
In the first movie, Elizabeth's dress and the corset are symbolic of the restrictions of society and their impact on women. The corset and the heavy dresses women wore at the time were burdens to their bodies. Brocade is a heavy material! Imagine all that weight coupled with humidity and a super tight corset. The clothes were another tool in which you can argue women were kept subservient to men. How could a woman protest, shout, run, jump or keep her wits about her if her breathing was restricted by a corset and heavy fabric?
In other words, the restrictions of society were sucking the life out of her and were an ill-fit.
You can argue that Jack's rescue was symbolic and literal. Obviously, he pulled her from the ocean and saved her from drowning. I think it's interesting that the clothes were what was weighing her down and causing her to drown. (Drowning can be symbolic of being smothered or repressed). So he freed her of those shackles, the restrictions of being a dutiful daughter and perfect societal lady. Her gratitude to Jack may have something to do with both rescues. And notice that up until the end of the movie, she doesn't appear in those types of dresses again.