the one man band.

Started by LovelyOne10 pages

Originally posted by aniron
ye but there just as much verbal wit as there was in the first one. more physical. the kinda thing i mean with the innuendos was that she says to will something like "id have you right now if it werent for these bars" and she opens her big cake hole in front of jacks face a lot to get her own way wheras in the first one she sets a much better example to the younger girls. i also prefer it less dark and less serious, makes it enjoyable to all age groups, without trying to be an obvious blokbuster.

wots communications like chiki? wher u studying? my roomie is doing something along those lines.

I agree with you..It seems to be taking a melodramatic turn in expressing relationships and its problems, and sex..well the J/E thing anyway...like more actions rather than words..

and I agree..I dont really like the dark way its going. Although its more adult hence the 1 billion..but I dont wannasee them trying to be all adult and tragic with AWE...

the way AWE starts from that salmon script..its really disturbing and dark for PotC you would have never seen that in Potc1

I'd just like to say that I was STRONGLY disagreeing with aniron with my first post here on this thread.

I meant that if faithful was boring, it's only cause you see the boring guy do it. If it were Jack being faithful, then you'd get a whole new level. I now us gals and guys need some romance, some hot scenes and sometimes a hint of you know what. But there is more to life than sex.

Much, much more.

And I think Jack realized that. He didn't just have a phycial attraction towards Lizzie, he loves her for her not her body. Money can NOT make you happy. You could buy cars and houses and all the caviar in the world but would that fill the void in your heart meant for some one you love.

Money cant love you back, it's the truth. A cold fact.

Deal with it.

Faithfulness is not boring, if you had a boyfriend or husband that was faithful to you, you'd be on the edge of your seat every day. Every second, but I guess you're not mature enough to realize that. Not everyone could see that, that's probably why T&T are making the slow transition to show that Jack is a human being not just a sex idol in the form of a pirate.

Faithfulness. If Jack did it, it'd be perfect. If the Unuich did it, I'd projectile vomit.

i was thanking you for being polite you fool lol!!!! of course you disagree, everyone disagrees! part of the challenge lol! faithful and jack just dont seem to go somehow to me. i think that by tying him down that he looses some of his mystery and edge. eh! maybe its just me lol.

faithfulness is not boring, but you wouldnt tune into soap operas and watch someone all happy and nice! jack is more exciting than that.

p.s lovly, whered u get the leaked script?

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR I missed all the action 😠 . WTF is wrong w/ that Fu%^$#ng girl. That girl or what ever it is, has issues with the world. Oh and is there such thing as studying creative writing WTH is that? I missed all the action that sucks.

well yes, there is creative writing, UNLESS!!!!! THIS IS ALL A DREAM!!!NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (you seem to enjoy conflict-strange) we've moved on im afraid. its all in the past.

Im thinking about going to orlando. But I wana know a god state for acting. I love acting, I love being the character. I just hope its not just a dream. I m considering it being a goal of mine. But it feels so far away. Like all the acting you could get is in california and new york. Im so far away from al that.

same here with directing! i wanna do everything, acting, directing, producing, writing. i know what u mean with the whol "hope its not a dream" my motto is it has to happen to someone, so why not us?

Originally posted by aniron
well yes, there is creative writing, UNLESS!!!!! THIS IS ALL A DREAM!!!NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (you seem to enjoy conflict-strange) we've moved on im afraid. its all in the past.

Oh I love conflicts it makes the world an interesting place 😄 . I missed all the action I guess I'm late 🙁 . But I'm happy all issues got resolved 😄

good good. i think everyone here loves a good argument lol!!!!!!! im going to have to pry myself away now i think!

i hope it stays resolved. next time ill beg the kraken to swallow me.

cant actually remember y we argued. lol. ah well. today is another day. good night folks. xXxXxXx

buenas noches....

AHH buenas noches, nighty night sweet dreams.

Just an idea, ties back to The Odyssey. Faithfulness isn't boring and you can look at Odysseus and Penelope for proof. It's a story about an epic battle, monsters, journeys to the underworld, etc, but the driving force behind it is about the love between a mortal man and a mortal woman. They are a married couple like a lot of married couples out there and they both cry when they are apart and do what they can to be with each other.
So faithfulness isn't boring and shame on anyone who thinks it is. No one thought Rhett Butler boring when he changed his mind about being a marrying man and actually married Scarlett. If you follow the Star Wars novels, no one thought Han Solo any more boring when he decided he would rather marry Leia than have her marry someone else and bring about peace in the entire galaxy. So I think the same can be true for Jack. He's not the first of his kind, a criminal/antihero but with a heart. When it all comes down to it, he's just another human being, not the great pirate he's rumored to be and I bet you anything he has very human needs and desires.

Its one man band who is killed by a hand

Originally posted by willofthewisp
Just an idea, ties back to The Odyssey. Faithfulness isn't boring and you can look at Odysseus and Penelope for proof. It's a story about an epic battle, monsters, journeys to the underworld, etc, but the driving force behind it is about the love between a mortal man and a mortal woman. They are a married couple like a lot of married couples out there and they both cry when they are apart and do what they can to be with each other.
So faithfulness isn't boring and shame on anyone who thinks it is. No one thought Rhett Butler boring when he changed his mind about being a marrying man and actually married Scarlett. If you follow the Star Wars novels, no one thought Han Solo any more boring when he decided he would rather marry Leia than have her marry someone else and bring about peace in the entire galaxy. So I think the same can be true for Jack. He's not the first of his kind, a criminal/antihero but with a heart. When it all comes down to it, he's just another human being, not the great pirate he's rumored to be and I bet you anything he has very human needs and desires.

YES!~!!! they don't make rogue/antiheroes who stand alone into films. ya know? an antihero is all well and good, but they cant sustain a film, much less a franchise, on them just being a loner. They ALWAYS turn things around by giving the antihero a cause or a true love, and THAT is the crux of the story. I cant remember, but is there ever an antihero that ends a trilogy or film the same way he started?! not in my world. lol.

Spike in buffy he vampire slayer didnt end up o his own^^

even when he was good he was still rather anti- hero ish he nearly killed a man

and he ended up with the woman (buffy)

they usually behave like anti hero's because they feel the world has rejected them. Its their way to close off the harsh reality..which is that they are rather alone. Their way of surviving in a world where they feel rejected.

The anti hero wikipedia:

In literature and film, an anti-hero has widely come to mean a fictional character who has some characteristics that are antithetical to those of the traditional hero. An anti-hero in today's books and films will perform acts generally deemed "heroic," but will do so with methods, manners, or intentions that may not be heroic. The actual use of the word, however, is fairly recent, and its primary meaning has somewhat changed. As recently as 1940, the 600,000-word Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, Second Edition, listed it but without a definition. By 1992 the American Heritage Dictionary of the American Language defined an anti-hero only as "a main character in a dramatic or narrative work who is characterized by a lack of traditional heroic qualities, such as idealism or courage," not as a person who nevertheless performs heroic acts. Even the more recent Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 11th Edition, of 2004, says: "(1714): a protagonist or notable figure who is conspicuously lacking in heroic qualities." The original meaning, therefore, is that of a protagonist who is ineffectual and hapless, rather than resolute and determined, whether his motives are good or bad. In some instances, anti-hero has come to refer to a protagonist of a work whose actions and motives are villainous or questionable.

Thus, anti-heroes can be awkward, antisocial, alienated, cruel, obnoxious, passive, pitiful, obtuse, or just ordinary. When the anti-hero is a central character in a work of fiction the work will frequently deal with the effect their flawed character has on them and those they meet along the narrative. In other words, an anti-hero is a protagonist that lives by the guidance of their own moral compass, striving to define and construe their own values as opposed to those recognized by the society in which they live. Additionally, the work may depict how their character alters over time, either leading to punishment, un-heroic success, or redemption.

The late 20th and early 21st century saw the rise of comic books and graphic novels featuring a boom of anti-heroic characters such as Batman, whose dark and brooding nature, along with their questionable methods, contrasted with their openly "heroic" peers like Superman. The apparent selfish nature of an anti-hero is often revealed to be a farce used to survive in a harsh universe, from which the anti-hero is sometimes redeemed through an act of love or friendship, such as with Star Wars' Han Solo.

Many modern anti-heroes possess, or even encapsulate, the postmodern rejection of traditional values symptomatic of Modernist literature in general, as well as the disillusion felt after World War II and the Nuclear Age. It has been argued that continuing popularity of the anti-hero in modern literature and popular culture may be based on the recognition that a person is fraught with human frailties, unlike the archetypes of the white-hatted cowboy and the noble warrior, and is therefore more accessible to readers and viewers. This popularity may also be symptomatic of the rejection by the avant-garde of traditional values after the counter-culture revolution of the 1960s.[ 2 ]

The values surrounding the characterization of an anti-hero have arguably changed. In the postmodern era, traditionally defined heroic qualities, akin to the classic "knight in shining armor" type, have given way to the gritty truth of life, and authority in general is being questioned. The brooding vigilante or "noble criminal" stereotype of characters like Batman is slowly becoming part of the popular conception of heroic valor rather than characteristics that are deemed un-heroic

i like how people pick on random things. faithfulness isn't boring, but i'd find it boring to have jack sparrow tied to commitment. you know the FICTIONAL character lol.!!!!!

I dont want to think of him like that, (unless with me lol). i love him how he is, a casanova!!! untamable. (unless by me lol)