Originally posted by SpunkySmurph
I really hoped that someone would point out that this supposed 'nuke' from the Venom run was NOT a nuke. Yes, it was cannonical, but it wasn't a nuclear blast.It was NAPALM. Big difference
I've heard this argued many times. Are we sure? Mushroom cloud? The people in the ship actually using the word "nuke?"
Where do we get this napalm retcon from?
Guys, I'm not saying that it's right. Or that it makes sense.
I'm not arguing sensicality, but rather officiality....
Has it been officially retconned or changed by marvel?
Again, this isn't in order to argue FOR the Nuke's admitance as evidence. Anywhere.
NO ONE thinks that Wolverine is capable of taking a nuke. Hell, even Capt It Up acknowledges that taking a nuke and taking nitro's blast were PIS. I'm not saying otherwise.
I'm just wondering what the official statement is.
Originally posted by Ize19
Nope, I'm afraid not. You see, when the adamantium was bonded to Wolverine's bones, it was done on a molecular level. Basically, his bones ARE adamantium. That's why it was stated that when Magneto ripped the adamantium from him, that he did so by removing it at a molecular level. So long as his skeleton survives intact, and there is no damage being repeatedly done after the incineration, there is nor reason for Wolverine to be unable to regenerate.
Ok.
I'm still asking, if eveything organic gets vaporized, what is left to regrow new tissue?
Unless, you are now telling me that Logan is made of an Organic Adamantium. Which would be the single GAYEST comic book scenario ever created. I will personally go to Marvel and kick somebody's as*!
God, what a terrible storyline and character.
These idiots just write any old thing that comes to mind, with no respect for the readers, logic, continuity or anything.
So, Logan has adamantium/organic bones that can somehow make new cells from nothing.
Very nice.
I could have written that storyline with my clenched buttocks wrapped around a piece of chalk, while my head is in a bag of rabid cats.
Originally posted by masterbruce
the sign wouldnt even survive a regular blast, comics arent drawn accurately from a scientific standpoint
That's why it is always a big PLUS for writers to be intelligent, no matter what area they write in.
Clownie tards that blwo their way into jobs at these big companies should also have to be responsible for the silliness that falls out of their collective rectum.
After all, we pay good money.
Originally posted by Soljer
Guys, I'm not saying that it's right. Or that it makes sense.I'm not arguing sensicality, but rather officiality....
Has it been officially retconned or changed by marvel?
Again, this isn't in order to argue FOR the Nuke's admitance as evidence. Anywhere.
NO ONE thinks that Wolverine is capable of taking a nuke. Hell, even Capt It Up acknowledges that taking a nuke and taking nitro's blast were PIS. I'm not saying otherwise.
I'm just wondering what the official statement is.
I believe that Marvel is holding a press conference tomorrow night concerning this issue. It would seem that the team of analysts that have been working on this situation, have finally come to a conclusion after gathering solid, scientific evidence.
The president will first give a brief statement, trying to calm people down. Then, after a blessing from the pope, Stan Lee will be video-conferenced in for a few minutes.
Once these formalities have been completed, all the answers will be exposed. Finally.
Originally posted by Horrificus
I believe that Marvel is holding a press conference tomorrow night concerning this issue. It would seem that the team of analysts that have been working on this situation, have finally come to a conclusion after gathering solid, scientific evidence.
The president will first give a brief statement, trying to calm people down. Then, after a blessing from the pope, Stan Lee will be video-conferenced in for a few minutes.
Once these formalities have been completed, all the answers will be exposed. Finally.
🙄
Don't have to be a dick.
The question remains. Was this later referred to on pannel has napalm? Or is the ONLY reference to it "nuke"?
Hm?
Like I said, it is NOT representative of Wolverines abilities, and as far as this thread goes, he DEFINITELY dies. I don't care about that. I still remain curious, however.
Re: The Nuclear Blast Durability Challenge
Superman- Blinks.
Silver Surfer- Laughs.
Thor- hurt a little, or takes no damage.
Hulk- normal= Koed. Mad= hurt.
Green Lantern- does he have his shields up? If so he should be fine.
Iron Man- nope.
Wolverine- nope.
Spiderman- nope.
Venom- mega intense heat, plus symbiote (I mean symbion), do I have to answer?
Last four equals nothing except Wolverine's skeleton.
Originally posted by Ize19
Nope, I'm afraid not. You see, when the adamantium was bonded to Wolverine's bones, it was done on a molecular level. Basically, his bones ARE adamantium. That's why it was stated that when Magneto ripped the adamantium from him, that he did so by removing it at a molecular level. So long as his skeleton survives intact, and there is no damage being repeatedly done after the incineration, there is nor reason for Wolverine to be unable to regenerate.
Eh, i think that might be stretching it a bit, to say the least. A nuke by all means should reduce wolverine to his bare essentials, which is essentially, nothing. Nothing but an inanimate skeleton. Vaporised to the point that logically, as he is not immortal, his consciousness should have left him due to the fact that, well there isint a wolverine anymore. So long as he is living, he shuold always regenerate. But where i fail to understand the sense of wolverine surviveing utter vaporizaiton is the fact that thier should be nothing for the regeneration to act on. What can you regenerate when there is nothing to regenerate?
And i dont mean nothing on a molecular level, im saying, does his regen also regeneate his soul once it has left his body? That too could be a stretch, but by all means a nuclear missile should kill wolverine, 200 times. This is all accented by the fact that the upcoming issue is going to try to explain what happened in that scene, so i guess in a few days we MIGHT, all know the answer. might..
Originally posted by masterbrucelol it's an inside joke.
what're you talking about? please make sense before you post
Originally posted by masterbruceTheir your threads and not mine. You know actions speak louder than words.
just because I believe wolverine can beat spiderman does not mean I hate spiderman. Im a big spidey fan 😉
I love fanboys, can't you tell? Btw wolverine CAN beat Spiderman, he just doesn't take the majority, but that's off topic.
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555
Eh, i think that might be stretching it a bit, to say the least. A nuke by all means should reduce wolverine to his bare essentials, which is essentially, nothing. Nothing but an inanimate skeleton. Vaporised to the point that logically, as he is not immortal, his consciousness should have left him due to the fact that, well there isint a wolverine anymore. So long as he is living, he shuold always regenerate. But where i fail to understand the sense of wolverine surviveing utter vaporizaiton is the fact that thier should be nothing for the regeneration to act on. What can you regenerate when there is nothing to regenerate?And i dont mean nothing on a molecular level, im saying, does his regen also regeneate his soul once it has left his body? That too could be a stretch, but by all means a nuclear missile should kill wolverine, 200 times. This is all accented by the fact that the upcoming issue is going to try to explain what happened in that scene, so i guess in a few days we MIGHT, all know the answer. might..
It's an established fact that Wolverine's healing factor is not controlled by his mind, but that it is part of every cell in his body. As for his soul, there have been times when his healing factor has brought him back from death, so that's already been dealt with. I do believe that his healing factor shouldn't have brought him back as fast as it did against Nitro, but, as you said, they are going to be explaining that.
Originally posted by Ize19
It's an established fact that Wolverine's healing factor is not controlled by his mind, but that it is part of every cell in his body. As for his soul, there have been times when his healing factor has brought him back from death, so that's already been dealt with. I do believe that his healing factor shouldn't have brought him back as fast as it did against Nitro, but, as you said, they are going to be explaining that.
yeah, of all things that scene definately raised alot of questions
i had something else to say but now i forgot lol :/
but yeah, time will tell i guess
Wolverine CAN survive a nuclear blast to his face.
WHY?
Because his skeleton would survive. Guess what's in the bones that's protected by adamantium? That's right, bone marrow...which contains blood cells, which would allow Logan to regenerate whole.
This is why Wolverine can survive anything short of complete disintegration of his skeleton.
Originally posted by masterbruceHow the hell is the bone marrow going to phase through his skeleton?
Wolverine CAN survive a nuclear blast to his face.WHY?
Because his skeleton would survive. Guess what's in the bones that's protected by adamantium? That's right, bone marrow...which contains blood cells, which would allow Logan to regenerate whole.
This is why Wolverine can survive anything short of complete disintegration of his skeleton.
Originally posted by masterbruce
Wolverine CAN survive a nuclear blast to his face.WHY?
Because his skeleton would survive. Guess what's in the bones that's protected by adamantium? That's right, bone marrow...which contains blood cells, which would allow Logan to regenerate whole.
This is why Wolverine can survive anything short of complete disintegration of his skeleton.
which brings wolverines mortality into question
which potentially stems into a much deeper, messy debate
because the marrow explination doesnt make much sense either
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555
which brings wolverines mortality into questionwhich potentially stems into a much deeper, messy debate
because the marrow explination doesnt make much sense either
dude, alot of things in comics don't make sense. Spiderman punches a metal wall and breaks it...that would imply his bones are hard like steel and his skin is hard as well or else his fist would shatter and his skin would be ripped apart. But its comics, its not science.
Originally posted by masterbruceUmm, it does when the marrow is INSIDE the adamantium!!
How does Spiderman shoot more webbing than his arms/body can hold? How come Hulk's pants don't rip off when he grows? How come superman's cape survive so much punishment? How come no one can tell resemblance between clark and superman?it's called comics...laws of science and logic dont apply.