Originally posted by Prodigal Knight
All right, it's not Dooku. But let me ask you a question Faunus? Why cannot Yoda say that statement? Yoda has trained many of a Jedi, why couldn't he say that statement? Because of the 400 years part? Does it even matter, the main significance of that statement is that Qui-Gon Jinn in his prime was the greatest swordsmen the Order has seen in a very long time.Very well, conceded on this point. But still, does it really matter? If Yoda has been shown to be a lightsaber instructor, why couldn't he said that? I mean, besides Tyvokka and Yaddle, there are no other Jedi I can recollect that are at least 400 years old.
Look. I'm not denying that at one point, Qui-Gon may have been an extraordinary duelist and combatant. What I'm disputing is simply the method and source you're using to deduce that. You have to understand that when the TPM novel was written, the character of Dooku had yet to be created. As such, his role as Qui-Gon's master was open to be held by another Jedi. The quote seems to imply that it is his master who is speaking. If so, it is retconned. The other possible meaning is of an outside teacher instructing him - Tyvokka is just a random excuse, and Yoda is far too old to fit the quote. The statement says
"in over 400 years of teaching"; we know him to have taught for twice as long. Any good author would have used the true value or else would have phrased it as something akin to the following:
"Not in 400 years had his instructor seen so extraordinary a swordsman."
A statement like that is what you could have used to support your argument. As it is? It just doesn't stand.