Originally posted by Blair Wind
If Digi/Scoobs can do it with people they met before through others we can do the same 😬
Originally posted by Blair Wind
I dont know what DC said about [b]my character, but she has taken many peoples powers without meeting them and just by knowing of them (fate, zatanna, and sentinel being just some of many) 😬 [/B]
Here's one instance I found of it....
Originally posted by DarkCrawler
We will only use the powers she has been SHOWN to use. Nothing more. We will show scans of these. And make sure she stays UNDER Thanos level. And we won't be switching the powers after prep. And how many magical beings powers she has been shown to use? 7-8 at best. And she can't just pick specific powers.That is all that matters.
Sorry, but BA is still my character. Hell I may have said the same thing (I doubt it though), we were not planning on using characters she had not used before, but figured if Digi/Scoobs could do it, then what the hell, why couldnt we?
Your getting lost in the technicalities of something my partner said in haste. It is within her powerset 😬
Originally posted by Blair Wind
Sorry, but BA is still my character. Hell I may have said the same thing (I doubt it though), we were not planning on using characters she had not used before, but figured if Digi/Scoobs could do it, then what the hell, why couldnt we?Your getting lost in the technicalities of something my partner said in haste. It is within her powerset 😬
Anyway, I'll leave it to Batdude and the judges to sort through, I was just pointing it out.(Besides, it's really your opponents job to argue this stuff anyway, not mine.)
Originally posted by DigiMark007You could have had an extra post last round if that was the case...
Yeah, no way BW/DC's opening writeup is under 10000 characters...unless I'm losing my mind.We're editing ours like hell to get it under 10K for our next round. Since when do we have unlimited?
{edit}
...my Word program says about 18,000. Seriously guys.... 😬
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Yeah, no way BW/DC's opening writeup is under 10000 characters...unless I'm losing my mind.We're editing ours like hell to get it under 10K for our next round. Since when do we have unlimited?
{edit}
...my Word program says about 18,000. Seriously guys.... 😬
On the other hand ... I still had 4 posts left at the end of the match .... whistling
😂
Originally posted by bigbran
You could have had an extra post last round if that was the case...
Yeah, I'll just write a book, have it as my writeup, and post count be damned....because I'll say everything I'd ever need to.
*goes to copy/paste entire Thor respect thread onto writeup*
We really need a ruling on this.
Originally posted by DigiMark007Yeah I just confirmed Digi
Yeah, I'll just write a book, have it as my writeup, and post count be damned....because I'll say everything I'd ever need to.*goes to copy/paste entire Thor respect thread onto writeup*
We really need a ruling on this.
Defently need a ruling on this.....
Originally posted by Blair Wind
no no no. We sent batdude two completely different things (he didnt tell us not too)MY battle plan was 9964 and DC's prep was about the same 😬
If you want just count the battle plan as one post (since it should have fit scans and all) for me, and we can continue on from there 😬
Hmm. Well, ok. At least's there's an explanation.
But I still thought there was 1 team writeup. Not 2 individual ones from each partner.
And I still like the "1 writeup" myself, since that's what everyone has been using until just now (in past tourneys too). I don't know if it was official, but I was under the assumption that that was the rule for writeups.
I personally don't think it's a huge deal. It's not like they flooded anything with scans. They legitimately were just explaining their preparation time (which they didn't over-do, it's not like they used too MUCH prep) and their battle plan.
Their plan was a little more complex, and needed a little more explanation. It isn't as if they just tried to flood their opening post though.
I, for one, have no problem with it.