Originally posted by Alfheim
Do you know what the defintion of a spite thread is?No Spite Threads
Now, a spite thread is usually considered as a [B]thread opened to intentionally be one-sided (because the poster may not like that character, or opened to goad another person into responding, etc.).
Moderators will decide if or if not a thread was made out of spite. Spite threads are NOT tolerated and will be closed, and the poster warned (or more severe consequences will be taken if that poster's been warned multiple times).Does this thread come under the above defintion?[/b]
So what you're saying is we're not allowed to geniunely or otherwise see what the limits to the faith tht a person has in a given character?
Anf you may be interested to know that its not a singular person whom thinks that she can take either of the two one on one, but a group of posters who each think that she can.
Is not the intent of ANY thread to gain responses from people? Would that not make ANY thread a spite thread under that definition?
Originally posted by Alfheim
P.S. Whats an OP? I quoted xmarks because he was the one that started this thread.
Original Poster. The perosn who created the thread.
There have been threads where the OP has created a thread heavily obvious of their malice toward a certain character or characters, but people have managed to have a discussion on the subject without people frequently trying to disrupt and troll it by calling it a spite thread every chance they got.
Go look at the "can any mutant beat superman" thread. It's obvious from the first post that there is heavy sarcasm and malice in the thread's original intention.