Originally posted by dirkdirden
If people would just STFU about racism it will help the problem go away.
that i disagree with. research the civil rights movement, and further back to abolitionists. what if they all just stfu?
its just all the useless pissing and crying and hating that i find useless (research fotn)
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
White people, lol.Anyways your old quote didn't have a lasting affect at all. I just happen to remember the sh*t-talk you were spewing that day on top of which just earlier i was teaching my visiting nephew how to play G.O.W. and it all somehow and weirdly connected to you quote.
Now with that aside, a question. Do you think White-only scholarships at a predominately White prestigious University are really necessary in this day and age.
Originally posted by PVS
its a safe betwhat a cooincidence, because thats the exact percentage of the time you waste of people who frequent the GDF> coincidence?
so you annoy your friends, family, and coworkers by calling them racists? fight on brave soldier...fight on
yes, because hating people solves problems, doesnt it?
Well like the Greeks, you bet on the wrong horse cause you're well, wrong..again.
And it's that's small of a percentage.
No. I don't annoy them. I don't do it the way you do, PVS. I merely have discussions.
Hating a racist attitude is better than being tolerant of it.
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Well like the Greeks, you bet on the wrong horse cause you're well, wrong..again.
wow, i never looked at it that way, thanks
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
And it's that's small of a percentage.
its thats....what?
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
No. I don't annoy them. I don't do it the way you do, PVS. I merely have discussions.
no, trust me, you're annoying them. they just dont want to rock the boat and confront you because they have to live/work with/hang out with you.
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Hating a racist attitude is better than being tolerant of it.
no, both are useless. although it takes no effort to tolerate whereas to hate proves how superficial and hypocritical one can be.
Originally posted by chris_64256
Quick question: Can Milano kids get a black scholarship?
I think you mean "mulatto" Otherwise, why would kids from Milan (Italy) necessarily be eligible... And, I am not sure about that, but if it's anything like American Indian privileges, you can if you're at least 1/8th.
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Would that be racism... No. It wouldn't be. One might actually take it as fact if looked at from a certain view.
So you're saying that all blacks have 'inherent racism' (from a certain view)... Interesting, why then, don't you hate on all blacks since you're the guy who is so "anti-racism"/ "racism-hater"?
Originally posted by PVS
its thats....what?no, trust me, you're annoying them. they just dont want to rock the boat and confront you because they have to live/work with/hang out with you.
My bad for the typo GN.
First off, the issue/topic is mostly brought up to me. But since you know the people I live/work with/hang out with firsthand, then it's fair for you to make that assumption.
🙄
Re: Today's Headline: Sholarships, for whites only.
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
This morning, I picked up the Boston Metro newspaper, the most circulated paper in the city, and guess what the headline, in big and bold words were..."Scholarships, For Whites Only.."
And you do realize that there are scores of minority only and black only scholarships? And that there aren't any white people in the GDF making a fuss over it? And that every time they make one there isn't a front page headline that says "New Black Only Scholarship"? You do know all of this, don't you?
Originally posted by Robtard
So you're saying that all blacks have 'inherent racism' (from a certain view)... Interesting, why then, don't you hate on all blacks since you're the guy who is so "anti-racism"/ "racism-hater"?
No. I'm not saying all Blacks have inherent racism. I'm saying some do and are taught to hate Whites from a tender age and vise-versa.
Originally posted by Kinneary
So when you say that all whites are racist, it's okay to point out that all blacks are racist, and therefore whites are no different from anyone else?
When have I said all whites are racists. Can you provide any evidence of my saying such a thing so I can then answer your question properly?
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
No. I'm not saying all Blacks have inherent racism. I'm saying some do and are taught to hate Whites from a tender age and vise-versa.
But whites have inherent racism... Yea, your views on what is "racism" isn't severely skewed. 🙄
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Sure the hecklers were asking for it but Kramer could've hid his inborn and inherent racism like most whites do when in public, and said something else beside the inherent White Anti-Black racism.
You clearly have a chip on your shoulder towards "whites" solely because of their complexion... I think that would certainly be defined as "racism".
Re: Today's Headline: Sholarships, for whites only.
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
This morning, I picked up the Boston Metro newspaper, the most circulated paper in the city, and guess what the headline, in big and bold words were..."Scholarships, For Whites Only.."
Now I was attacked on here for saying Boston, Mass. was one of the most racist places in the nation. That I was in denial. I now think I'm being forced to be in denial. And with the attempt of my being forced into ignorance, they'll try and fail of course because I'm too much of a fact-seeker and to much of a watcher to be blinded by the truth in the pathetic way you other pundits are.
This article talks about the need to give Caucasian college students more of an opportunity than they already inherently have and have had for the past, probably half-millennia in this country.
To fulfill the need to do it because other ethnicities are doing it. How much more advantages, money, power, status, privileges, and wealth do you need?
They say it's not White supremacy fund. I say it's BS.
I say STFP, its for 250 dollars and its based on keeping a 3.2 GPA and you only need to be 1/4 caucasion. Wow thats really going to launch some white folks into a terribly powerful position of economic resources huh.
Funds based on "race" are biased and bullshit.
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
When have I said all whites are racists. Can you provide any evidence of my saying such a thing so I can then answer your question properly?
Sure the hecklers were asking for it but Kramer could've hid his inborn and inherent racism like most whites do when in public,
Re: Today's Headline: Sholarships, for whites only.
Originally posted by FistOfThe NorthThey say it's not White supremacy fund. I say it's BS.
..and I say it's equality. Guess we should take a look at the fine print before crying fowl.
* Student only has to be 1/4th Caucasian.
* Scholarship value is $250..........
* It's being offered by a student group, not the school.
* You have to have a 3.2 or greater GPA
So, it's also discriminatory towards stupid people. I can't wait for the short bus brigade to roll up on B.U. and cry fowl.
Anycrap, they proved their point quite effectively. The most dramatic coming from people who don't read any furthur than the headlines. I applaud them for outing double standards and proving that affirmative action is a sham led by walking contradictions.
The days have having your cake and eating it to are slowly drawing to a close. Thank God.