What's worse: Pedophiles or Murderers?

well, you just have to surround yourself with family and friends. thats half the battle.

Originally posted by bigbran
So, what is worse:
Someone who touches children, or someone who kills people (on purpose)?

A person who kills a child then molests the dead child is absolutely disgusting. 😬

Originally posted by Council#13
A person who kills a child then molests the dead child is absolutely disgusting. 😬

Preferably that way then the other way around.

You're saying that to kill a child then molest the child is better than to molest the child then kill the child? I mean, if you're the child, I guess it might be better....

no.....no way.

Originally posted by Council#13
You're saying that to kill a child then molest the child is better than to molest the child then kill the child? I mean, if you're the child, I guess it might be better....

Originally posted by Council#13
You're saying that to kill a child then molest the child is better than to molest the child then kill the child? I mean, if you're the child, I guess it might be better....

Yes that's exactly what I'm saying... It will safe the child from a hell of a lot of pain.

Yes, but if you believe in the afterlife, I doubt a child would enjoy watching it's body being molested. However, if the child is unconscious as it is being molested, then murder afterwards.... well, that would probably be the most preferable way for the child to go.

Originally posted by Council#13
Yes, but if you believe in the afterlife, I doubt a child would enjoy watching it's body being molested. However, if the child is unconscious as it is being molested, then murder afterwards.... well, that would probably be the most preferable way for the child to go.

I'm sure the child would rather see it's body getting molested from a safe distance without feeling the pain, then feeling the pain and watching the rapists as they are molested.

If the child is knocked out, then it really doesn't matter one way or the other.

Whatever, it's all sick. 😬

Originally posted by bigbran
So, what is worse:
Someone who touches children, or someone who kills people (on purpose)?

Umm..they're both equally bad. However - I would say that molestation can have an even greater impact and longer lasting degerative effect on a society, seeing as how many of those who have been molested - often times grow up to be molestors themselves.

Originally posted by usagi_yojimbo
Umm..they're both equally bad. However - I would say that molestation can have an even greater impact and longer lasting degerative effect on a society, seeing as how many of those who have been molested - often times grow up to be molestors themselves.

I would disagree there, a murder often has a far greater impact on society. Especially when people are killed because of their ideals and if they are known. The murder of one movie maker in this country has done so much more wrong then a hundred rapes have. The murder of one politician can do exactly the same.

For society as a whole murder often has a greater impact

Would the murder or rape of a major politician make a bigger splash, I wonder.... hmm

They both are bastards, but the murders are worst.

Originally posted by Council#13
Yes, but if you believe in the afterlife, I doubt a child would enjoy watching it's body being molested. However, if the child is unconscious as it is being molested, then murder afterwards.... well, that would probably be the most preferable way for the child to go.

moot.....i dont like that word.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
I don't. Your point is moot.

Each to his own, I guess. 😬

Originally posted by Council#13
Would the murder or rape of a major politician make a bigger splash, I wonder.... hmm

Murder... Especially if that person has some radical idea's...

Are you sure? Imagine Bush getting raped! Or murdered..... hmm

The likelihood of the latter is far more than that of the former. Unless Bush gets indicted and imprisoned.