Balck Panther Vs Iron Fist

Started by Alfheim4 pages
Originally posted by ExtraMision5555
exactly what im saying, someone with similiar abilities suddenly gets stomped by BP? realisticly it doesnt make sense, honestly

Exactly, but the thing is BP has more stuff on him that he can use to beat IF, therefor BP wins the majority but not a massive one.

Stop following me around! j/k 😛

Originally posted by Apolloknight
Did you see the fight I posted, he was ampped bloodlusted trying to kill panther with every attack, panther evades with ease, I fail to see your point in that, oh and panther has bested spidy in h2H before, but that another fight.

read above..

So were going to pretend the last scan didnt happen?

Originally posted by Apolloknight
Did you see the fight I posted, he was ampped bloodlusted trying to kill panther with every attack, panther evades with ease, I fail to see your point in that, oh and panther has bested spidy in h2H before, but that another fight.

read above..

It doesnt matter its just one fight. the reason why I brught up the Spiderman examples is because all good MAs can hold their own against Spiderman even if they cant beat him they can give him a good fight.

If you just look at IF feats in general they are very similar BP should not be curbstomping IF.

Originally posted by ExtraMision5555
So were going to pretend the last scan didnt happen?

You see, this is the faulty logic I speak of when it comes to panther,

DID YOU NOT SEE WHERE PANTHER GETS THE CHIP OFF HIM, and now he is no longer out to fight IF, but rather attempt to get the Chip off him.

Panther was no longer fighting all out (if he ever really was), how can you not comprehend that? its not that difficult to understand!!!???

He sneaks him in an attempt to get the chip off, Misses, and IF makes him pay!!!??

But yes, lets use those scans for the entire fight, overlooking the rest of the fight, wow, just wow my friend.

Black Panther wins 7/10. Iron Fist puts up a GREAT fight though. By NO means is it a curbstomp.

Originally posted by Apolloknight
You see, this is the faulty logic I speak of when it comes to panther,

DID YOU NOT SEE WHERE PANTHER GETS THE CHIP OFF HIM, and now he is no longer out to fight IF, but rather attempt to get the Chip off him.

Panther was no longer fighting all out (if he ever really was), how can you not comprehend that? its not that difficult to understand!!!???

He sneaks him in an attempt to get the chip off, Misses, and IF makes him pay!!!??

But yes, lets use those scans for the entire fight, overlooking the rest of the fight, wow, just wow my friend.

What part of you cant use one fight as overwhelming evidnce dont you understand?

You have fights were DD kicks the **** out of the Punisher than you get a fight where The Punisher does well, thats why you need at least two fights to come to a conclusion.

Originally posted by Apolloknight
You see, this is the faulty logic I speak of when it comes to panther,

DID YOU NOT SEE WHERE PANTHER GETS THE CHIP OFF HIM, and now he is no longer out to fight IF, but rather attempt to get the Chip off him.

Panther was no longer fighting all out (if he ever really was), how can you not comprehend that? its not that difficult to understand!!!???

He sneaks him in an attempt to get the chip off, Misses, and IF makes him pay!!!??

But yes, lets these scans for the entire fight, overlooking the rest of the fight, wow, just wow my friend.

Ok, first off take it down like 10 notches, keep in mind this is merely a debate. if you noticed, i acknolwedged the ENTIRE fight,

Originally posted by ExtraMision5555
For someone who can keep up with spiderman When amped with chi to not be able to tag BP is a bit odd, but nevertheless, it happend and im not denying it.

on more than one occassian.

anyway, understand, you seem to be implying that IF is incapable of strikeing BP, in to which i say that other fights IF has been in contradict his implied inability to strike BP. Its as simple as that. To add, ive never known anyone who willingly wants to get struck in the face 82 times, so IF black panther is so agile, aside from being defensive (as he was not trying to hurt IF anymore) wouldent he think to atleast dodge? IF hit black panther, and short of BP being intoxicated beyond belief or somehow immobilized, regardless of BP's intentions, the fact remains that IF jabbed his face into oblivion

But more importantly, again, i cannot stress enough how consistantly IF has hung with people argueably better than black panther. So what in the world would make him not able to hit BP? Plan and simple, it doesnt make sense. Its just as rediculous as spiderman being unable to hit black panther.

Originally posted by ExtraMision5555

But more importantly, again, i cannot stress enough how [b]consistantly IF has hung with people argueably better than black panther. So what in the world would make him not able to hit BP? Plan and simple, it doesnt make sense. Its just as rediculous as spiderman being unable to hit black panther. [/B]

exactly

Originally posted by Alfheim
What part of you cant use one fight as overwhelming evidnce dont you understand?

You have fights were DD kicks the **** out of the Punisher than you get a fight where The Punisher does well, thats why you need at least two fights to come to a conclusion.

Since when did that become a rule? 😑

Using that logic, Spider-Man can defeat non-bloodlusted (but still fighting hard) Fantastic Four. 🙄

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Since when did that become a rule? 😑

Using that logic, Spider-Man can defeat non-bloodlusted (but still fighting hard) Fantastic Four. 🙄

Whoa so what your telling me is that if you ahve one fight that can be used as overwhelming evidence? Thats my point.

Originally posted by ExtraMision5555
But more importantly, again, i cannot stress enough how [b]consistantly IF has hung with people argueably better than black panther. So what in the world would make him not able to hit BP? Plan and simple, it doesnt make sense. Its just as rediculous as spiderman being unable to hit black panther. [/B]

If only that were true, my friend. But apparently that just can't work. Right.

Otherwise Spider-Man vs. Cap would be a curbstomp in Peter's favor, Black Panther would take out Wolverine (Iron Man > Wolverine), etc.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Whoa so what your telling me is that if you ahve one fight that can be used as overwhelming evidence? Thats my point.

No, you missed the point. Spidey has done that TWICE against the FF. 😉

Originally posted by Metalmanx
If only that were true, my friend. But apparently that just can't work. Right.

Otherwise Spider-Man vs. Cap would be a curbstomp in Peter's favor, Black Panther would take out Wolverine (Iron Man > Wolverine), etc.

I understand your point ( i think? ) but speciffically, speaking of IF, he has been shown a bit more consistant that some of the cahracters you mentioned. (as opposed to Wolverine who has had very very high end showings and some quesitonably low end ones) ANd in THIS scenario, relative to iron fist, i firmly stand by my statement

and im talking about characters IF has fought that are compareable to BP

Originally posted by Metalmanx
No, you missed the point. Spidey has done that TWICE against the FF. 😉

Well yeah Bro, you misunderstood me im just using logic. I should have elaborated. All im saying is that two is better than one, just because you have two does not mean you win the argument striaight away, but one is definetly not enough for serious evidence.

Originally posted by Alfheim
, but one is definetly not enough for serious evidence.

Well, I guess this fight cant be used for evidence, going by that logic.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Well yeah Bro, you misunderstood me im just using logic. I should have elaborated. All im saying is that two is better than one, just because you have two does not mean you win the argument striaight away, but one is definetly not enough for serious evidence.

doh

Originally posted by Metalmanx
doh

Ok now im getting stressed...whats the problem? 😒

Originally posted by Alfheim
Ok now im getting stressed...whats the problem? 😒

Oh, nothing.

Loooooove yoooou. 😍

Originally posted by ExtraMision5555


Originally posted by Alfheim

Originally posted by Metalmanx

inlove

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Oh, nothing.

Loooooove yoooou. 😍

no no no no....please elaborate because i dont think ive got anything wrong. dont get high and mighty just explain what your trying to say again.....please