Wolverine Gauntlet( My first time doing one so dont be too harsh)

Started by Metalmanx6 pages
Originally posted by capt it up
You feel that grammar depicts a person’s level of intelligence? So therefore you must feel that Albert Einstein was UN intelligent. Albert Einstein was a “dyslexic” he failed English all through out high school. His grammar was very bad, so do you believe he is UN intelligent due to the fact his grammar is not up to par with your standards?

Originally posted by Metalmanx
Of course, I agree with this. In my haste, I felt it was implied that I only meant that if English is one's native language and they have no learning disabilities to worry about. I didn't mention it at the time, but that's what I originally meant.

Edit: I think what frustrates me the most is that I know capt can write properly. He's done it maybe...once before. But he did it, nonetheless. And he's in college. So I can only assume he knows how to write properly, otherwise, well, he probably wouldn't be there. 😬 But he doesn't do it. And I'm totally fine with being lazy sometimes, but it just makes one's point FAR less effective in opinion (and in many others'😉 when you can't even put in enough effort to make your post readable.

But hey, that's just me.

Originally posted by capt it up
You feel that grammar depicts a person’s level of intelligence? So therefore you must feel that Albert Einstein was UN intelligent. Albert Einstein was a “dyslexic” he failed English all through out high school. His grammar was very bad, so do you believe he is UN intelligent due to the fact his grammar is not up to par with your standards?

MetalmanX said he wasn't talking about dyslexics or nonenglish speaking people.

heh, 3 corrections from us 😆

Re: Re: Re: Re: Wolverine Gauntlet( My first time doing one so dont be too harsh)

Originally posted by masterbruce
penance stare wouldn't do much to wolverine

wolverine would win majority over Ghost Rider

Explain?
Explain how Strange can't take a Penance Stare, but Wolverine is going unaffected?

The Penance Stare gives out all of the damamge that the person that is getting hit, has caused to others... which I guess Wolverine hasn't hurt anyone... 😕

Wolverine would get Kthef*ckingOed if he got hit with one, most people would.

It's good to learn about characters before you think Wolverine can beat them.

Also, how is Wolverine beating him? Hellfire, Penance Stare, the Chains?
Oh no, Wolverine has the claws, and blocks all of those attacks!

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
i think he cleared that up after that post 😬

No you all missed the point.

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
wow...this thread...😐

anyhow...let's respond to a few things

Spider-man def. gets the maj. over Wolverine, and that's all i say about that (not turning this into a S Vs. W thread>😉

Wolverine>spiderman

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
GR>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wolverine (jesus are you kidding me? how the hell HOW!?!? will Wolvie put him down? stabbing will not do ANYTHING!)

See here why lack of a certain characters showing vs another can really hurt some one. I said if wolverine was able to stab ghost rider it would be a stalemate due to the fact that ghost rider reacts to the adamatium which causes him to explode KOing ghost rider and Logan. It has happen on two occasions if not three.

anyway

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
anyone immortal (basiclly) vs. anyone immortal (basiclly, to a lesser degree) is a stalemate😐
therefore! DP Vs. W is a stalemate leaning to DP slightly (like .3 slightly)

I don’t agree. Logan is the superior fighter he would take the majority.

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
IF>>Wolvie pretty much

I do not agree nor does marvel for that matter.

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
Thing might pull maj. over W, but idk, won't get into that much either.

that's all

How does think take a majority? Thing has no healing factor which means logan claws can put thing down easier then one of things punches can put logan down. See as how logan combat speed far surpasses Things and Logans fighting skill also far surpasses things then it quite clear that logan will be land more hits in more vital areas of the body.

Sure is alot of Wolverine gauntlets.

Originally posted by capt it up
Wolverine>spiderman

See here why lack of a certain characters showing vs another can really hurt some one. I said if wolverine was able to stab ghost rider it would be a stalemate due to the fact that ghost rider reacts to the adamatium which causes him to explode KOing ghost rider and Logan. It has happen on two occasions if not three.

anyway

I don’t agree. Logan is the superior fighter he would take the majority.

I do not agree nor does marvel for that matter.

How does think take a majority? Thing has no healing factor which means logan claws can put thing down easier then one of things punches can put logan down. See as how logan combat speed far surpasses Things and Logans fighting skill also far surpasses things then it quite clear that logan will be land more hits in more vital areas of the body.

1)like i said, whatever, won't get into that.....
2)i haven't seen those occasions, if you could get some scans, it'd be dandy
3)i said slight, and i was assuming that DP got all his reg. equipment, which means guns and grenades, so i gave DP a slight (see the .3?) uperhand
4)Things no clouch, of course Wolvie is faster but Thing is also stronger so if Wolvie pulls a slash, he could grab Wolvie and immobilize him

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
2)i haven't seen those occasions, if you could get some scans, it'd be dandy[/B]

Don’t have a scanner.

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
3)i said slight, and i was assuming that DP got all his reg. equipment, which means guns and grenades, so i gave DP a slight (see the .3?) uperhand[/B]

What will guns or grenades do? It come down to swords vs Claws. Wolverines claws are unbreakable deadpool swords are not. Logan more skilled fighter then DP. Logan more durable then Deadpool. Logan can cut off deadpool arms and such. Deadpool can not say the same.

Originally posted by NiñoAraña 4)Things no clouch, of course Wolvie is faster but Thing is also stronger so if Wolvie pulls a slash, he could grab Wolvie and immobilize him [/B]

So he stronger what does that do for him? You really think such a skilled fighter and one many times faster then thing is going to get grabbed? Not to mention logan could simply stab things arm if that were to happen.

Originally posted by capt it up
You feel that grammar depicts a person’s level of intelligence?

Effective communication skills are an indicator of one's possession, or lack, of intelligence. To argue that is, well, unintelligent.

Originally posted by capt it up
So therefore you must feel that Albert Einstein was UN intelligent. Albert Einstein was a “dyslexic” he failed English all through out high school. His grammar was very bad, so do you believe he is UN intelligent due to the fact his grammar is not up to par with your standards?

First, are you comparing yourself to Einstein? If so, you are a loser.

Second, dyslexia is not an excuse for bad grammar or typing skills. I am a severe dyslexic who makes a living writing. I get real pissed at those who use dyslexia as an excuse for anything.

You insult all people with either dyslexia or the remotest iota of intelligence with the above post you made.

Dyslexia is not an excuse for stupidity or being lazy.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Effective communication skills are an indicator of one's possession, or lack, of intelligence. To argue that is, well, unintelligent.

That logic is completely flawed. By your logic a person who stutters would be unintelligent, because they can not communicate intelligently or what you seem to think is in an intelligent manner.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
First, are you comparing yourself to Einstein? If so, you are a loser.

No I was not. How intelligent of you to assume I was comparing my self with that of Einstein. Also why would me comparing my self with Einstein make me a loser?

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Second, dyslexia is not an excuse for bad grammar or typing skills.

Never said it was. I think you missed the point of my argument. Dyslexia can how ever make your grammar skills not at the level of most. It just means you must work hard and re read your work thoroughly.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
I am a severe dyslexic who makes a living writing. I get real pissed at those who use dyslexia as an excuse for anything.

No one was using it as an excuses.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
You insult all people with either dyslexia or the remotest iota of intelligence with the above post you made.

How did I insult any one? You are saying that I am insulting people based off the fact I disagree with grammar showing intelligence. All I did was show that grammar in no way shape or form shows intelligences by showing that Einstein grammar was not up to par with the standards yet he was undeniable an extremely intelligent person.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Dyslexia is not an excuse for stupidity or being lazy.

No one said it was. It is actually the complete oppisit. Dyslexia on average actually is a sign of extreme intelligences and high IQ.

Capt It Up, are you dyslexic? just curious.

Originally posted by masterbruce
Capt It Up, are you dyslexic? just curious.

yes, I am .

Originally posted by capt it up
yes, I am .

ok. I just asked because sometimes your posts are very clear and sometimes they aren't, but they're always understandable, which is all that matters.

Originally posted by capt it up
That logic is completely flawed. By your logic a person who stutters would be unintelligent, because they can not communicate intelligently or what you seem to think is in an intelligent manner.

Stop trying to turn the tables or trying to look smart. A person with a speech impediment can still possess excellent communication skills. Are you a moron?

Originally posted by capt it up
No I was not. How intelligent of you to assume I was comparing my self with that of Einstein.

Actually I was assuming nothing, hence the question mark.

Originally posted by capt it up
Also why would me comparing my self with Einstein make me a loser?

Just asking that question makes you a loser.

Originally posted by capt it up
Never said it was. I think you missed the point of my argument. Dyslexia can how ever make your grammar skills not at the level of most.

No, being a lazy ass with dyslexia can affect the level of you grammar, and make you type sh*t like this,"Dyslexia can how ever make your grammar skills not at the level of most.

Originally posted by capt it up
How did I insult any one? You are saying that I am insulting people based off the fact I disagree with grammar showing intelligence. All I did was show that grammar in no way shape or form shows intelligences by showing that Einstein grammar was not up to par with the standards yet he was undeniable an extremely intelligent person.

Comprehension is not your strong suit is it?

Originally posted by capt it up
No one said it was. It is actually the complete oppisit. Dyslexia on average actually is a sign of extreme intelligences and high IQ.

That is pure comic gold. Please reread that passage, walk away, and cease posting any other arguments that make you look that foolish.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Stop trying to turn the tables or trying to look smart.

I am trying to do neither. I am simply showing you that not having up to par communication skills does not make you any less intelligent as another individual.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
A person with a speech impediment can still possess excellent communication skills.

True how ever others can not. What I am trying to say is that having efficient grammar skills does not mean that a person is intelligent or if they do not posses theses skills unintelligent.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Are you a moron?

No and I do not appreciate the question and would like for you to avoid asking those type of questions.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Actually I was assuming nothing, hence the question mark.

From the way you had responded to my post it seem to me that you thought I was.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Just asking that question makes you a loser.

There was no reason for such a comment. There really is no reason to make this a hostile debate.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
No, being a lazy ass with dyslexia can affect the level of you grammar,

No, Dyslexia can affect your grammar level do to how you perceive the information when writing.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
and make you type sh*t like this,"Dyslexia can how ever make your grammar skills not at the level of most.

That comment was not necessary and there is no reason to be hostile. What I said was on topic and a correct statement; I see nothing wrong with it.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Comprehension is not your strong suit is it? .[/i]

It is actually. I understood fully what you had typed.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
That is pure comic gold. Please reread that passage, walk away, and cease posting any other arguments that make you look that foolish.

Again this type of comment is not needed. I will remain here and I will post my response. I am not looking foolish if any thing you may be looking like an @$$, but that is about it.

Well capt, while I do think sometimes you irrationally defend Wolverine, I think it's ridiculous for people to invalidate your opinion because your grammar isn't the best. I think they should keep comments like "moron" and "loser" to themselves. I also understand the point you were making about Einstein: bad grammar doesn't equal stupid person all the time, but intolerance and childish name-calling does. I have two family members and know quite a few others that are dyslexic and while I wouldn't consider any of them geniuses, I wouldn't say any of them stupid by any stretch of the imagination either.

Back on topic, here's the list of people Wolverine would beat in my opinion:

Spider-Man. Yeah I said it, and I'm sticking to it.
Black Panther.
Power Man.
Iron Fist.
The Punisher.
The Thing.

The people that Wolverine could go either way with depending on the writer:

Ghost Rider.
Deadpool (if knockouts count).

The people that Wolverine's ass belongs to:

Iceman.
Doom.

1.Spider-Man> Takes the win.
2.Black Panther=Has the skills, but will his vibranium suit stop the adamantium.
3.Luke Cage< As far as I know adamantium is the one thing able to cut his skin. He gets cut quickly.
4.IceMan>
5.Ghost Rider- Don't know enough here to say one way or the other.
6.DeadPool> Deadpools arsenal gives him the upperhand here, not a lot, but an upperhand.
7.Iron Fist< I doubt hed be able to get the "iron fist" before getting cut.
8.The Punisher< Without a good enough fighting ability, healing, immortality, etc to back him up, Frank doesn't have much chance.
9.The Thing< I personally think Thing should easily take this, but evidently Marvel sees otherwise, it goes to Logan.
10.Dr Doom> Self explanatory

Originally posted by StarsNeverFall7
1.Spider-Man> Takes the win.
2.Black Panther=Has the skills, but will his vibranium suit stop the adamantium.
3.Luke Cage< As far as I know adamantium is the one thing able to cut his skin. He gets cut quickly.
4.IceMan>
5.Ghost Rider- Don't know enough here to say one way or the other.
6.DeadPool> Deadpools arsenal gives him the upperhand here, not a lot, but an upperhand.
7.Iron Fist< I doubt hed be able to get the "iron fist" before getting cut.
8.The Punisher< Without a good enough fighting ability, healing, immortality, etc to back him up, Frank doesn't have much chance.
9.The Thing< I personally think Thing should easily take this, but evidently Marvel sees otherwise, it goes to Logan.
10.Dr Doom> Self explanatory
i pretty much agree with this and just to let you know GR>W

Lets never do a Spiderman vs Wolverine guantlet again, I dont even care who wins, its just not worth it. To me that battle with always end with both going to drink beers in a bar, and then they go to a cyber-cafe to mock the fanboys who defend them both in different VS forums.