Star Wars Legacy Comics

Originally posted by Lightsnake
1. George Lucas states Anakin brings Balance to the force and is the real Chosen One in ROTJ's commentary.
2. ????
3. PRofit!

How about you use the quote feature, it's easier that way to see what you're saying.

[b]http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Chosen_One

Behind the scenes

* It is believed by some that the prophecy of the Chosen One is connected to the prophecy of the "Son of the Suns", as stated in the novelization of Episode IV:

"…And in the time of greatest despair, there shall come a savior, and he shall be known as THE SON OF THE SUNS."
—Journal of the Whills, 3:127

This, however, was written in 1977, when the prophecy of the Chosen One had not been developed, and is actually referencing the actions of Luke Skywalker, not his father.
[B]
* George Lucas himself has stated that Anakin is the Chosen One, although Luke indirectly served as the catalyst that allowed Anakin to fulfill the prophecy.

Using wiki as a source? For all I know, Gideon here could have edited it.

How about you shut up and accept you're wrong?

and you just used the same page as a source, you dolt.

Here's the full quote:
"The first film starts with the last age of the Republic, which is it's getting tired, it's old, it's getting corrupt.

There's the rise of the Sith, who are becoming a force, and in the backdrop of this we have Anakin Skywalker, a young boy who is destined to be a significant player in bringing balance back to the Force and to the Republic...

Then in the second film we get into more of that turmoil. It's the beginning of the Clone Wars, it's the beginning of the end of democracy in the Republic, sort of the beginning of the end of the Republic. And it's Anakin Skywalker beginning to deal with some of his more intense emotions of Anger, Hatred, Sense of Loss, Possesiveness, Jealousy, and the other things he has to cope with.

And then we will get to the 3rd film where he is seduced to the Dark Side..

Which brings us up to the films 4, 5, and 6, in which Anakin's offspring redeem him and allow him to fulfill the prophecy where he brings Balance to the Force by doing away with the Sith and getting rid of evil in the universe..."

http://blogs.starwars.com/moosepoodo/17

See, if Nadd IS Sith, it doesn't help how many Sith he kills

Originally posted by Lightsnake
How about you shut up and accept you're wrong?

Nuh huh.

and you just used the same page as a source, you dolt.

I'm gangstar like that.

Here's the full quote:
"The first film starts with the last age of the Republic, which is it's getting tired, it's old, it's getting corrupt.

There's the rise of the Sith, who are becoming a force, and in the backdrop of this we have Anakin Skywalker, a young boy who is destined to be a significant player in bringing balance back to the Force and to the Republic...

Then in the second film we get into more of that turmoil. It's the beginning of the Clone Wars, it's the beginning of the end of democracy in the Republic, sort of the beginning of the end of the Republic. And it's Anakin Skywalker beginning to deal with some of his more intense emotions of Anger, Hatred, Sense of Loss, Possesiveness, Jealousy, and the other things he has to cope with.

And then we will get to the 3rd film where he is seduced to the Dark Side..

Which brings us up to the films 4, 5, and 6, in which Anakin's offspring redeem him and allow him to fulfill the prophecy where he brings Balance to the Force by doing away with the Sith and getting rid of evil in the universe..."

http://blogs.starwars.com/moosepoodo/17

See, if Nadd IS Sith, it doesn't help how many Sith he kills

You're using some random blog as a source?

Key words: in order to.
Didn't realise that Darth PMAN created Anakin so that he would destroy the sith, lmao!!

You whine about reading comprehension all the time. It's funny to note that you seem to lack it yourself. The phrase "in order to" is indicative that midichlorians had to birth Anakin for the prophecy to be fulfilled. Plagueis's goal for Anakin (if he even created Anakin, that is) is irrelevent. For all you know, like Sidious, perhaps Plagueis believed that "balance of the Force" translates to "Sith dominance".

Wrong!! Palpatine = Poser/Loser. Period.

No. Palpatine toppled the Jedi order, conquered the galaxy, and replaced the Republic with the most powerful institution in galactic history. Those are three things that Bane couldn't do. So, no. Sidious = last Dark Lord of the Sith.

Bane = Poser/Loser.

Period. 🙄

Read secondary source material? How about no?

Novelizations are G-canon. Period. 🙄

How about you prove up and quit lying.

Lucas made it clear in commentaries that "balance of the Force" means "no Sith". In the meantime, why don't you prove that Bane pulled a moon and Kas'im redirected Bane's energy? 😆

Did you mean the massive GL quote and gives the source itself?

Christ.

You want proof?

Originally posted by Sexyback

"...because in the end, the prophecy is true: Balance comes back to the Force."

-- George Lucas, Rolling Stone Magazine, June 2005.

Moron.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Did you mean the massive GL quote and gives the source itself?

Christ.

You've got to remember. This guy thinks he's a "better debater than 99% of the SWV". Delusional and incompetent would be excellent words used to describe Planet.

Originally posted by Gideon
You whine about reading comprehension all the time. It's funny to note that you seem to lack it yourself. The phrase "in order to" is indicative that midichlorians had to birth Anakin for the prophecy to be fulfilled. Plagueis's goal for Anakin (if he even created Anakin, that is) is irrelevent. For all you know, like Sidious, perhaps Plagueis believed that "balance of the Force" translates to "Sith dominance".

You miss the point. Read over it again.

No. Palpatine toppled the Jedi order, conquered the galaxy, and replaced the Republic with the most powerful institution in galactic history. Those are three things that Bane couldn't do. So, no. Sidious = last Dark Lord of the Sith.

How does that contradict with Palpatine being a lame loser/poser?

Bane = Poser/Loser.

Period. 🙄

Bane got better chicks than Palpatine. So no, Palpatine is the only loser around here, I know it's hard to accept that your man's lame.

Novelizations are G-canon. Period. 🙄

Still secondary. Period.

Lucas made it clear in commentaries that "balance of the Force" means "no Sith".

I'd prefer not to take the word of a known liar.

In the meantime, why don't you prove that Bane pulled a moon and Kas'im redirected Bane's energy? 😆

Already been done, my friend.

Originally posted by Captain REX
You want proof?

Balance comes back temporarily, not permenantly.

Moron.

😆

Not according to Georgie. The Balance is permanent at the end of ROTJ; the EU is a tangent, as Ush has said many times. That's how the levels of canon work.

Since you're anal about the 'I need quoted proof' thing, here you go:

I don't read that stuff. I haven't read any of the novels. I don't know anything about that world. That's a different world than my world. But I do try to keep it consistent. The way I do it now is they have a Star Wars Encyclopedia. So if I come up with a name or something else, I look it up and see if it has already been used. When I said [other people] could make their own Star Wars stories, we decided that, like Star Trek, we would have two universes: My universe and then this other one. They try to make their universe as consistent with mine as possible, but obviously they get enthusiastic and want to go off in other directions. - George Lucas, from an interview in Starlog #337

Planet, does your incompetence know any bounds? I find it very, very amusing that someone with your "extreme skillz" has fallen so far, but like I told you once before, your fall from grace has been a very rapid one. But here's where the sudden stop comes in, and you go 😖PLAT:.

Novelizations are G-canon. They supercede everything, save for two things: the movies and George Lucas. Since Lucas rarely contradicts a novelization, and Lightsnake has given the guys at EoD proof that, for the most part, everything in the novelization is there because Lucas wishes it to be - it all fits in to the grand design. I don't expect you to understand that, though.

I'd prefer not to take the word of a known liar.

This will have been the third time I've asked you: prove that I am "a known liar".

Especially when you're constant boasting of "Kas'im redirected the blasts!" and "Bastilla was said to have been weakened!" have both been proven to be lies within themselves.

Already been done, my friend.

No, it hasn't. 🙄

Edit: Now, put the PoD cover jacket away and put your pants back on - and understand that Rex, Lightsnake, and myself are all three correct and you are, my friend, very much incorrect.

Also, because you're too lazy to go grab your ROTS DVD and watch the damned documentary called 'The Chosen One'...

The Prophecy IS true. - George Lucas, 'The Chosen One' Documentary

Anakin IS the Chosen One. - George Lucas, 'The Chosen One' Documentary

Not to mention that I fail to see where Freedon Nadd brought balance to the Force...

I think this thread should be closed.

I mean, what's the point.

It's everyone versus Sexyback, who is clearly a dumbass.

I think it's time someone be banned on grounds of utter stupidity.

I like how he's had opportunity to post here, but decides not to...

i like how you guys get into a fight over every stuipd debate in here calling each other names wow makes you all look so darn smart

I like how you did not contribute to the topic and therefore are no better. 😊

http://www.darkhorse.com/profile/preview.php?theid=14-070&p=0

Next issue looks badass.