Thanos vs Superman

Originally posted by the Darkone
Prove this bullsh** statement, Thanos handle beings that travel at light speed Adam Warlock, Fallen One, Silver Surfer, Thor hammer, classic Drax, Captain MAr-vell the sh** come out of your mouth is f**king absurd. Thanos strength level is mid trans and can amp at will through his Eternal heritage, Thanos has handle planetary explosion on more than one occasion, being cursed by death made him even tuffer, Thanos can manipulate all forms of energy, Thanos is a manipulator and schemer and 100x smarter than Superman, Thanos will play Superman like a fool.

Thanos has high herald level strength, nothing more. Superman is the strongest herald level being. His feats prove it.

Planet explosions are kid stuff when you talk about Superman. Thanos may be smarter than Superman but that won't matter here since there is no prep here. Thanos has to use reflexes and speed to compete.

Superman can seriously embarrass Thanos IF HE WANTED TO. Just add speed and it will happen.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
Thanos fought and beat the abstract Oblivion once.

Prove me wrong.

I don't get it.

Originally posted by h1a8
I can handle a being that can travel light speed if they don't travel light speed on me. 🙄

Thanos has high herald level strength, nothing more. Superman is the strongest herald level being. His feats prove it.

Planet explosions are kid stuff when you talk about Superman. Thanos may be smarter than Superman but that won't matter here since there is no prep here. Thanos has to use reflexes and speed to compete.

Superman can seriously embarrass Thanos IF HE WANTED TO. Just add speed and it will happen.

What you say= too sh**!

STFU, and go watch the Super Bowl you damn troll!!

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't get it.

Looks like it's true then. Thanos is above Oblivion

Originally posted by the Darkone
What you say= too sh**!

STFU, and go watch the Super Bowl you damn troll!!

😂

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
What, you can't prove it didn't happen?

Looks like it's true then. Thanos is above Oblivion

I don't understand what you are saying. Remember I said the negative is always true by default until proven otherwise. Thanos can't beat Oblivion (without IG or HOTU). This is true until proven otherwise.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't understand what you are saying. Remember I said the negative is always true by default until proven otherwise. Thanos can't beat Oblivion (without IG or HOTU). This is true until proven otherwise.

A negative is always true, h1, and it looks like you can't prove the negative wrong here.

Originally posted by h1a8
Define 'more powerful'.

Low balling is a sin you know.

A negative is always true unless proven otherwise.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Capable of greater offensive output. You picked a showing I picked one.

What is greater offensive output?
Is it:
1. ability to damage something very durable
2. ability to damage a large amount of stuff (even if it is not very durable)

or is it something else?

I pick high showings, not low ones.

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
But he did, off panel.
Prove he didn't.

A negative is always true, h1, and it looks like you can't prove the negative wrong here.

The negative is that Thanos didn't beat Oblivion. Can the positive be proven (That Thanos beat Oblivion)? If so then the negative is false and the positive is true. Otherwise the negative is true by default.

Thanos is too fast for Superman.

Originally posted by h1a8
What is greater offensive output?
Is it:
1. ability to damage something very durable
2. ability to damage a large amount of stuff (even if it is not very durable)

or is it something else?

I pick high showings, not low ones.

The negative always true UNLESS the positive can be proven. Is that better?

The negative is that Thanos didn't beat Oblivion. Can the positive be proven (That Thanos beat Oblivion)? If so then the negative is false and the positive is true. Otherwise the negative is true by default.

Pandora's box... until you switch your logic completely like usual.

Originally posted by h1a8
What is greater offensive output?
Is it:
1. ability to damage something very durable
2. ability to damage a large amount of stuff (even if it is not very durable)

or is it something else?

I pick high showings, not low ones.

The negative always true UNLESS the positive can be proven. Is that better?

The negative is that Thanos didn't beat Oblivion. Can the positive be proven (That Thanos beat Oblivion)? If so then the negative is false and the positive is true. Otherwise the negative is true by default.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos won't be able to touch Superman if Superman didn't want to be touched. Superman can pop Thanos before Thanos can make an action if Superman wanted to. Superman can move around like a fly and attack Thanos from all angles overwhelming him. Superman is

stronger
faster
as durable
has better reflexes
has better skill

and TK won't do anything to a being that has many planet weight forces

I'm still waiting on why you believe the Fallen One was only 3 meters away... He looked a lot furhter away than that.. so pleas give me the narration that backs up this claim that he was only that far away. Then, once we've established that you have NO bases for that being the distance... then that throws out your theory about how long it would take to reach light speed... which you still can't prove he was, since yaknow, it was never stated.

Superman Beats Thanos, Quan, Kurupt Thanosi and Nihilist at once! osheet

Mount Thanos becomes Superman's 2nd fortress. biscuits

Originally posted by quanchi112
I already defined it. Thanos is just more powerful. Refers to the Galactus, Mar-vell owning, ability to cause permanent death in the cancerverse as proof.

He didn't own Mar-vell. He merely choked him right after Mar-vell was stomping him. Peers choke peers all the time. Also Mar-vell is nowhere near Superman's level of strength.

Causing permanent death is useless if you can't cause death in the first place. It was a non feat. The cancerverse character's had shitty durability but was able to come back from the dead. The fact that they stayed dead doesn't add anything to killing someone who can't rise from the dead anyway.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
I'm still waiting on why you believe the Fallen One was only 3 meters away... He looked a lot furhter away than that.. so pleas give me the narration that backs up this claim that he was only that far away. Then, once we've established that you have NO bases for that being the distance... then that throws out your theory about how long it would take to reach light speed... which you still can't prove he was, since yaknow, it was never stated.

The further apart Fallen One started then the worst of Thanos reactions and speed.

Originally posted by Badabing
Superman Beats Thanos, Quan, Kurupt Thanosi and Nihilist at once! osheet

Mount Thanos becomes Superman's 2nd fortress. biscuits

Originally posted by h1a8
I asked a different question the second time. Learn to read. I asked you to define power output, not more powerful.

He didn't own Mar-vell. He merely choked him right after Mar-vell was stomping him. Peers choke peers all the time. Also Mar-vell is nowhere near Superman's level of strength.

Causing permanent death is useless if you can't cause death in the first place. It was a non feat. The cancerverse character's had shitty durability but was able to come back from the dead. The fact that they stayed dead doesn't add anything to killing someone who can't rise from the dead anyway.

Prove Mar-vell is nowhere near Superman's level of strength. Thanos dominated Mar-vell who wasn't even remotely close to threatened by Nova or the Surfer.

Thanos can cause his death and Superman fighting in character means he will take some shots. It's in his character to assume he can take it.

Originally posted by h1a8
This argument actually favors me more. By him starting more than 3 meters away then within the first 3 meters of travel Fallen One was going under light speed. Thanos thus saw him coming within that 3 meters of under light speed and reacted in time.

The further apart Fallen One started then the worst of Thanos reactions and speed.

actually it does.. in either case thanos reacted to a faster than light speedblitz.. period. The point is.. you have NO IDEA how far away the Fallen One was... you have NO IDEA how long it takes for him to accelerate to light speed and you have NO IDEA how fast he was actually traveling. Period.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Death to all infidels and heathens.

Originally posted by h1a8
I asked a different question the second time. Learn to read. I asked you to define power output, not more powerful.

He didn't own Mar-vell. He merely choked him right after Mar-vell was stomping him. Peers choke peers all the time. Also Mar-vell is nowhere near Superman's level of strength.

Causing permanent death is useless if you can't cause death in the first place. It was a non feat. The cancerverse character's had shitty durability but was able to come back from the dead. The fact that they stayed dead doesn't add anything to killing someone who can't rise from the dead anyway.

You are simply pathetic.