Originally posted by FeceMan
Ooh, boy, let's blame religion for AIDS.🙄
Anyway, I take some form of perverse pleasure in wondering what the answers would have been if the following questions had been asked:
1. If you could go back and wait until marriage to have sexual intercourse, would you?
2. If you could go back and wait to have sex, saving yourself for your current husband, would you?
I'm still not certain how not waiting until marriage to have sex is impractical. The only answer I can come up with is that we've decided that self-control is for suckers.
By the way Robtard said "a skewed view of religon", so he was not saying religon is bad itself just how people enforce abuse religon.
I think with pre-marital sex there needs to be a bit of common sense. The whole purpose of marriage is to create a loving bond between man and woman and to create a stable envinronment for children to brought up in, thats not a bad thing.
Do you have to get married though? If somebody has a girlfriend or boyfriend but loves them and intends to stick with them as much as possible why do they need to get married? Isn't this marriage in spirit?
To be quite honest it seems to me in general the reason why people tend not to have stable relationships in general is because mankind in general is a selfish species. Peoples attitudes to sex amongst other things can be a reflection of a persons personality. Do we live in a world were we can trust each other? Do we live in a world were there is justice? Do we live in a world were people are considerate? No the world is not a complete hell hole but there is a lot wrong with the world and society. Most people only care about number one and that attitude reflects itself in what people do sex being one of those things. If people were more considerate and compassionate stable relationships would be more common.
P.S. Im not saying that all people who have lots of partners are scumbags.