Originally posted by Soujaboysuperman is over 100 years old now???damn.....
Superman too has hundreds of years of experience, Thor, millions. So as a said, what makes you believe Majestic is a superior fighter to Superman?Majestic would also most likely be cut by Wolverine, no big deal. Wolverine's shown he can cut damn near any object or being.
When has Thor ever been shot?
When did Majestic take a bullet to the eye?
His sword can be easily dealt with. Thor before has shown he can transmute objects.
Yeah, thats most likely not the case. Thor has shown many abilities, from anti gravity, to anti force. There's nothing supporting your claims that Majestic can take any attack from Thor.
I would however like to know how Majectic is going to counter an anti gravity blast?
and Thor millions of years old??damn...im pretty sure that the asgardian faith isnt even 100,000 years old but whatever.....
no wolverine isnt cutting majestic... not enough muscle too.
majestics taken gunfire everywhere, he is P4P equal to superman in every category except moral, majestic will kill.
Thor rarely transmutates things so thats out of character, meaning not useable in this forum.
And majestics is fast, like really fast.....thors only hitting him if he uses lightning, but by then majestic will have already KOed him with one punch.
Originally posted by King KAM
superman is over 100 years old now???damn.....
He fought for millenia in asgard, if I recall correctly.
Originally posted by King KAM
and Thor millions of years old??damn...im pretty sure that the asgardian faith isnt even 100,000 years old but whatever.....
Originally posted by King KAM
no wolverine isnt cutting majestic... not enough muscle too.
Wolverine's plot device claws don't require extreme amounts of strength. They, literally, cut ANYTHING except for adamantium.
Majestic still wins. Just pointing some stuff out.
Thor has fought Gladaitor who is just as strong as Immortal Hercules, moves planets, collaspe star,flies at warp-speed, warrior skills, and Thor has beaten down Gladiator twice. Thor has fough beings that would punk Majestic all day, I am not taking nothing away from Majestic I like his character he will give Thor hell no doubt, I give Thor the slight majority 6/10.
Originally posted by King KAM
superman is over 100 years old now???damn.....and Thor millions of years old??damn...im pretty sure that the asgardian faith isnt even 100,000 years old but whatever.....
no wolverine isnt cutting majestic... not enough muscle too.
majestics taken gunfire everywhere, he is P4P equal to superman in every category except moral, majestic will kill.
Thor rarely transmutates things so thats out of character, meaning not useable in this forum.
And majestics is fast, like really fast.....thors only hitting him if he uses lightning, but by then majestic will have already KOed him with one punch.
Superman fought for 1000 years in Asgard.
It was retconned in Thor #80 that Asgard and it's people have been around since the dinosaurs. Mjolnir was responsible for the dinosaurs and the start of man.
Like I said. The plot device that is Wolverine's claws can cut through anything.
Ok, but when has he taken it to the eyes? I would like to see scans of this.
The characters fight to the best of their abilities, meaning all their abilities are up in the open.
Most characters Thor fights are fast. Most times it has no effects on the outcome of the battle. Also, I doubt Majestic is one shotting Thor.
This thread reads like a Majestic wishlist...........
Godforce blast the only thing that would hurt Majestros? Ha!
He'll run and grab his sword and run Thor through? I didn't see prep on the threadstarters post.
I said Majestic is around J'onn level because in all of his solo series, he didn't strike me as any higher.
From volume one to final cut, he wasn't exceptionally durable like i'd think he'd need to be to face down Thor.
Majestic is stronger, true.
But he doesn't fight like Flash, for those who are dangerously close to dropping the speedblitz argument.
He's not durable enough to take on Thor, and all his generic blasts, let alone his more exotic stuff, and still get the majority.
And for those who are touting all this underrating being from Armageddon, Cap Atom hurting Majestic badly with his blasts coincides with Majestics history of durability.
And Wildstorms history of quantum mechanics being a big deal.
The shitty thing about that crossover was the characterizations of the Wildcats(not the powerlevels), and the underrating of Jenny Q.
And the pointless dig about Majestic being weaker than Superman.
Thor 6/10.
He's a peer in strength, has about the same durability, but a much better damage soak, while oodles more versatility and firepower.
Question for those touting Majestic as this uber beast.....Have you read all of his books? Curious, is all......
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Anti-gravity blasts and matter transmutation are all well and good, but in the context of a fierce battle against a faster opponent, Thor might have trouble pulling those off.
Easily dealt with. Thor creates a shield around himself and attacks from there.
I just don't see Majestic's durability holding up to some of Thor's more powerful/exotic powers. I mean he couldn't even survive in the sun on his own, hows he going to deal with multiple lightning strikes?
Good to see some good arguments for Thor, even if it's a bit against my opinion.
Having Thor use more of his exotic powers is still a stretch though. The other arguments are completely legit, but usually when Thor is doing stuff like anti-grav, putting up shields, transmuting, etc. it's when he has a second to think it over, not when he's spouting Shakespeare and pounding on someone.
The other arguments are beginning to convince me though.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Good to see some good arguments for Thor, even if it's a bit against my opinion.Having Thor use more of his exotic powers is still a stretch though. The other arguments are completely legit, but usually when Thor is doing stuff like anti-grav, putting up shields, transmuting, etc. it's when he has a second to think it over, not when he's spouting Shakespeare and pounding on someone.
The other arguments are beginning to convince me though.
I understand where your coming from, about Thor's arrogance getting in the way of his battles. However as stated in your rules, he's bloodlusted. When Thor's bloodlusted he gets right to the head busting, similar to BRB's style.
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Thor%20Feats/thor30030le2.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Thor%20Feats/thor30031pw4.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Thor%20Feats/thor30032sw7.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Thor%20Feats/thor30033nn7.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Thor%20Feats/thor30034lv6.jpg
Now the point of these scans isn't to say "Thor battles Celestial, he easily defeats Majestic!" , it's simply to show that while enraged, Thor can do some damage.
The thing is that Majestros has the obvious speed advantage how great probably not that much.
Thor has some options to counter this. Omni-directional lighting and winds. That and he obviously has the higher damage output then Majestros and most characters his class.
So now the question becomes can Majestros take Thor's attacks both physical and energy based which is hard for any character to do.
Originally posted by Newjak
The thing is that Majestros has the obvious speed advantage how great probably not that much.Thor has some options to counter this. Omni-directional lighting and winds. That and he obviously has the higher damage output then Majestros and most characters his class.
So now the question becomes can Majestros take Thor's attacks both physical and energy based which is hard for any character to do.
Exactly. Majestic's faltering durability is what the question is. Can he or can he not take the damage dealt by Thor.
