Saddam Hussein to be executed...

Started by Kelly_LS15 pages

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
firing squad seems econimical.

Yeah they were just talking about that on CNN. What exactly is that?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
firing squad seems econimical.

Also, if done correctly, fast.

problem is finding a group of guys that can aim worth a damn.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
problem is finding a group of guys that can aim worth a damn.

I am sure it could be done automatically.

as in rata a tat tat? not really necessary. just shoot the scumbag in the head.
or let him be raped by a group of rabid hyenas.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
as in rata a tat tat? not really necessary. just shoot the scumbag in the head.
or let him be raped by a group of rabid hyenas.

Oh come on. That's drastic. Also, kinda sick. And worthy of punishment in my opinion.

Weird thought.

Answer?

Originally posted by Kelly_LS
Yeah they were just talking about that on CNN. What exactly is that?

A few shooters shooting someone.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh come on. That's drastic. Also, kinda sick. And worthy of punishment in my opinion.

Weird thought.


well, saddam shouldnt have wrought such havoc upon his people. have you heard about the things his sons did? they were the sick ones.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
well, saddam shouldnt have wrought such havoc upon his people. have you heard about the things his sons did? they were the sick ones.

No.

Did they think people should be killed through being raped by a group of rabid hyenas?

Originally posted by Bardock42
No.

Did they think people should be killed through being raped by a group of rabid hyenas?


no, i was kidding. his sons, i think their names were Usay and Quday, or something like that, man, they did some sick shit. one was an avid soccer fan. one year the iraqi team was really good, but they lost a game they should have won. he attached battery cables to their nads.
this is just what i heard.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
no, i was kidding. his sons, i think their names were Usay and Quday, or something like that, man, they did some sick shit. one was an avid soccer fan. one year the iraqi team was really good, but they lost a game they should have won. he attached battery cables to their nads.
this is just what i heard.

It is possibly that it is propaganda though.

Not that I don't think it's not possible.

i know, just thought i'd share. one of them, also something i heard, woild see a beautiful woman on the street, sometimes with her hubby, and rape her.

I don't know. It all sounds pretty bad. Then again lets not forget just how many people had to die in the war the US started. That is also an immense number.

alot of people would disagree with you, saying that iraq started the war with 9/11.

you ready for this? i agree with you that the U.S. started it. we started it years ago when we were there trying to force our ways upon them.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
alot of people would disagree with you, saying that iraq started the war with 9/11.

you ready for this? i agree with you that the U.S. started it. we started it years ago when we were there trying to force our ways upon them.

Which would obviously be idiotic. As Iraq did not attack the US and can not be linked to the act of terrorism. Though you are right, a lot of people would disagree. They are wrong though, it's an aggressive war of the US.

And though there happened a lot of bullshit before obviously. The US just started it by declaring war on Iraq and attacking it. Without the support of the UN I might add.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Which would obviously be idiotic. As Iraq did not attack the US and can not be linked to the act of terrorism. Though you are right, a lot of people would disagree. They are wrong though, it's an aggressive war of the US.

And though there happened a lot of bullshit before obviously. The US just started it by declaring war on Iraq and attacking it. Without the support of the UN I might add.


i just think that us being over there for years prior, on their "holy" ground, played a role in the 9/11 attacks.
then again, i am not a politician.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
i just think that us being over there for years prior, on their "holy" ground, played a role in the 9/11 attacks.
then again, i am not a politician.

It might. But Iraq did not attack you.

i know they didnt attack me personally. its not like they were saying "lets get RJ!!!"
by "us" i meant "us" in the universal sense.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
i know they didnt attack me personally. its not like they were saying "lets get RJ!!!"
by "us" i meant "us" in the universal sense.

But, I mean Iraq didn't. I understand what you meant. But it was terrorists that attacked you. Islamist terrorists. Iraq had no dealings in that.

Which is why the war in Afghanistan might have been justified reasonable. The one in Iraq is just an attack war, also against UN statutes.