Originally posted by MIXEITUP
yes and in my opinion spider-man is too overratedas far as namor he got super human speed and great feats of speed and agility its just that he is a power house and he fights guys like hulk ironman the thing and it wouldnt be so interesting if you see namor speedblitz most of those characters , namor was able to defeat ironman and was faster then him and i think we all agree ironman if more agile then spider-man and faster in combat as was already proven in there fight , venom is faster then spider-man as we saw already many times not as agile so what? he was fast enough to kick spider-mans ass so thats really all that matter and was fast enough to avoid punches from spider-man ...
and just for the record... namor doesnt need his speed to beat spider-man he just needs to grab his leg and pound him on the ground until he is dead which wont take too long , and when spider-man will be fast enough to catch missles let me know
Well consider the fact that spiderman is faster than let's say the beast, and the beast in his human form did catch missles back in the day's.
I think spiderman could do the same or are his hands to small??
Originally posted by Brutacus
Well consider the fact that spiderman is faster than let's say the beast, and the beast in his human form did catch missles back in the day's.
I think spiderman could do the same or are his hands to small??
who said spider-man is faster then beast? when beast was in his human form he was able to catch spider-man and spider-man himself said that beast is too fast to be avoided, current beast is even faster... please dont throw things that you only speculate without any proof
Originally posted by quanchi112
I can take what anyone dishes out. Thats for sure. If I started that thread Id be named by a bunch of people for overhyping a certain character which I dont do. I just base my opinion on what the comics have given me.
thats what alot of the people they call fanboys do(alot not all, or even most)
Originally posted by quanchi112
I can take what anyone dishes out. Thats for sure. If I started that thread Id be named by a bunch of people for overhyping a certain character which I dont do. I just base my opinion on what the comics have given me.
You do over hype Thanos and of course you think you're right. Most fanboys also say they don't over hype there fav characters, typical fanboy argument....
Originally posted by Endrict NuulWell, I only use what the comics give me like I said.
You do over hype Thanos and of course you think you're right. Most fanboys also say they don't over hype there fav characters, typical fanboy argument....
I never argue that Thanos takes Galactus or anything of that nature.
Originally posted by redhotrashGalactus is known fact to be stronger then Thanos in Marvel. Superman one million is from different universe, and we like to see the outcome of their encounter. He has his right to say whatever he chose, that why its debate.
You argue that he takes Superman 1 million, which he doesnt. But yeah Hulk is easily the most over rated, maybe of all time?
Originally posted by redhotrash
In the "Superman 1 million vs Thanos" thread I would think. Or it might have been supes 1mil vs Thanos and Darkseid in which you said Thanos solos. Do you not agree with that now?