Originally posted by Tassadar
Saturate the continent he's on.
conventional military technology isn't going to work, he is already countless generations ahead of us.
It'd be like the Aztecs against the Spanish again. If we want even a hope at beating IM we would need to change tactics immensely. Like I said before, an attack while he eats or sleeps would be best.
Originally posted by golem370youtube has the video
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba
Its not that we don't have the firepower to take IM down. "Little Boy" would have done it. Hell, we probably wouldn't even have to use nukes to do it.
However, when he has control of all our satellites, guidance systems, communications and whatever else, we aren't going to be able to hit him.
Unless he is partially retarded, IM's first move will be to disable the world's ability to use trans continental weapons, then would ground our air fleets/ruin the navy.
Originally posted by inamilist
Its not that we don't have the firepower to take IM down. "Little Boy" would have done it. Hell, we probably wouldn't even have to use nukes to do it.However, when he has control of all our satellites, guidance systems, communications and whatever else, we aren't going to be able to hit him.
Unless he is partially retarded, IM's first move will be to disable the world's ability to use trans continental weapons, then would ground our air fleets/ruin the navy.
thumbsup exactly
Originally posted by batdude123
Our best bet would be to use guerilla warfare.
lol
there is a massive difference between guerrilla warfare and the type of attacks we would need.
Any sort of direct combat with IM is not going to go our way. We must think more passively.
We have one massive advantage over him. We only need to succeed once, and he dies. A bunch of guys using IEDs and AK's from windows or in the woods aren't going to do it.
Originally posted by inamilist
lolthere is a massive difference between guerrilla warfare and the type of attacks we would need.
Any sort of direct combat with IM is not going to go our way. We must think more passively.
We have one massive advantage over him. We only need to succeed once, and he dies. A bunch of guys using IEDs and AK's from windows or in the woods aren't going to do it.
My point was that we couldn't use a direct approach. If we did, he'd slaughter us.