Originally posted by Devil King
The private contractors with body armour and machine guns, who are making more money than the legit troops anyway.The Bush administration is in bed with the same groups that, just a few years ago, we would have called fundamentalist fanatics, who have private armies with a religious ideology. The same kind of groups that set up places like Ruby Ridge and Waco, TX. These are the kind of people that own Blackwater.
I agree and I saw this answer coming...but there is not nearly enough military contractors out there.
I think a steady controlled pull out is best.
You know, I probably would have a different opinion if there were not as many American citizens in Iraq. I would want a major evac to occur in like 3 months. I say let the dumbasses kill each other. Weren't they doing it before the US destroyed their country? (Just not nearly as much.)
Originally posted by dadudemonThanks.
Great. I am glad you took the time to do that. It shows that you really do care about those around you.
Originally posted by dadudemonYeah, infact, I said it was a joke on you.
First...this postWas obviously a joke...but not at Hilary's expense. Have you ever heard of cynicism? Robtard is full of it. (No pun intended...or wait...nah.)
Originally posted by dadudemonWhich gives the impression that you took his post literally. That is why we said what we said.
I realized he was making a joke about my post in a cynical manner so I replied back with
Originally posted by dadudemonWasn't funny either.
Because he is making fun of me making fun of Hilary Clinton and my making fun of her was intended to be light hearted and not serious.
Originally posted by dadudemonWe misread your post. Sorry if we can't read your posts the way you intend them. This is the internet after all.
It appeared, though not entirely, that Robtard didn't catch the fact that my post was only intended as jest so he made fun of it with a slight twist of seriousness. (By poking fun of the logic via sarcasm.)
Originally posted by dadudemonI didn't catch on because your post could be taken another way, and since you're already considered an idiot, the stupid post is first assumed.
Bardock42 caught on to that and so did you. However, you, thinking that I missed something, didn't realize that I caught onto it from the beginning and it was actually Robtard that missed the complete jest of the post he was making fun of. (Though not completely. I think Robtard thought that there was some truth behind my words which sparked the content of his post.)
Originally posted by dadudemonThey do make sense, you gave the impression that you didn't understand, so we said you missed it.
Now, Bardock42, Robtard, and you, thinking that I didn't catch on, have both made comments that don't make sense:Why do they not make sense?
Simple, because I already pointed out that I knew Robtard was being cynical with his post:
Originally posted by dadudemonHow could we have "gotten" it? Your post was said in a completely awkward way.
I thought it was funny that Devil King made a joke about the "lesbianess" of Eleanore Roosevelt and it wasn't intended as actual political opinion on the issues. In reality, you, robtard, and Bardock42 were the ones not getting it and Devil King was the only who did get it. (Queue Robtard to chime in with a comment that says gay minds think alike.)
Originally posted by dadudemonIt should.
Because you took the time to point this out, I now understand what Robtard and Bardock42 think I was missing...which doesn't even make sense to me considering the content of my above post.
Originally posted by dadudemonYes.
Do you understand now why I was a little defensive when you said:
Originally posted by dadudemonNeither does complaining about people being a dick on the interweb, or saying Hillary is a man when she clearly isn't.
Shouldn't I be saying that about you, Robtard, and Bardock42? Do you want to know why I don't? Because it is teh interwebz and being a dick on the internet doesn't make you cooler in real life.
Originally posted by parenthesis
Which gives the impression that you took his post literally. That is why we said what we said.
My reply was far from giving off an impression that I didn't understand he was making fun of me it was more of "I'm too tired to deal with your bullshit right now" comment. I thought that the sigh smilie pretty much gave that away. It's your's and Robtard's fault for being an idiot. (Chime "but this is teh interwebz" comment. Who cares if it is the internet, if I am held to this dumbass standard for posting, why shouldn't you guys?)
Originally posted by parenthesis
Wasn't funny either.
Eye of the beholder...and it wasn't intended to be side splitting either. Surely you realize that.
Originally posted by parenthesis
We misread your post.
That's because you are idiots. Things fly over your heads too easily. I can't change that. See my above comment about "teh interwebz".
Originally posted by parenthesis
I didn't catch on because your post could be taken another way, and since you're already considered an idiot, the stupid post is first assumed.
No, you didn't catch on because you are an idiot. You also didn't catch on because you were too busy trying to suck Robtard's cock that you didn't realize you were falling into "group think". Does Robtard make you swallow?
Originally posted by parenthesis
They do make sense, you gave the impression that you didn't understand, so we said you missed it.
No matter how many different ways you put it, you misinterpreted and it was quite clear what was meant. It is grossly stretching to try to derive that I didn't understand his post. In retrospect, you really f***ed up by skipping over the post that acknowledged outright that Robtard was being cynical to my post...oops, you missed that again, didn't you?
Originally posted by parenthesis
How could we have "gotten" it? Your post was said in a completely awkward way.
Riiiiiiiiight. 🙄
Originally posted by parenthesis
It should.
Thanks for that insight, it was very helpful.
Originally posted by parenthesis
Yes.
Lies. You are too much of an idiot to understand something like that because you misunderstood a certain post of mine. 😉
Originally posted by parenthesis
Neither does complaining about people being a dick on the interweb, or saying Hillary is a man when she clearly isn't.
Complaining?...I seem to recall a few posts that were complaining about me being an idiot. I didn't complain...in fact, I even asked you about your "complaining" to try to accommodate you...but that was in fact bating. (Pun intended, bit***s 😉 .)
Also, don't think that I noticed how you treated the word "idiot" as it referenced me. You tried to distance yourself from my being labeled that. You don't want to come off as being such a dick on teh interwebz with me. I don't buy into that bullshit. Call me names directly and don't be a pu**y about it. What can I do? haxor ur internets?
Originally posted by parenthesis
We misread your post. Sorry if we can't read your posts the way you intend them. This is the internet after all.
Woah, **** you, *******. Stop speaking for "us" if you are a complete moron. Which you seem to be. I do not appreciate it. And as far as I know Robtard, he won't either.
For the record, dadudemon, you are still an idiot.
Originally posted by Devil King
Both my favorites have been whacked by the good people of Iowa. I guess we're really going to have another election based on superficial crap.
Don't completelely lose hope, just lose most of it.
Iowa also gave these results in the past:
Rep-
1988- Bob Dole (37%), Pat Robertson (25%)
1980- George H. W. Bush (32%)
Dems-
1992 - Tom Harkin (76%)Bill Clinton (3%)
1988 - Richard Gephardt (31%), Paul Simon (27%)
Originally posted by dadudemonHow were we supposed to know that?
My reply was far from giving off an impression that I didn't understand he was making fun of me it was more of "I'm too tired to deal with your bullshit right now" comment. I thought that the sigh smilie pretty much gave that away. It's your's and Robtard's fault for being an idiot. (Chime "but this is teh interwebz" comment. Who cares if it is the internet, if I am held to this dumbass standard for posting, why shouldn't you guys?)
Originally posted by dadudemonYeah.
Eye of the beholder...and it wasn't intended to be side splitting either. Surely you realize that.
Originally posted by dadudemonA lot of people would disagree with that. They would argue that you are the idiot for not being clear enough. I've seen Bardock42 use that argument here.
That's because you are idiots. Things fly over your heads too easily. I can't change that. See my above comment about "teh interwebz".
Another point: Try to understand your post was taken another way. Also, you not realising it was taken another way, makes you an idiot.
Originally posted by dadudemonThe ****? Robtard's just another poster, who happens to not like you (which is making me like Robtard) but Devil King is another who said you missed it. Do I suck Devil King's dick now? My opinion is not based off of dick sucking or favouritism, it's based off of my perspective as a new comer into this debate.
No, you didn't catch on because you are an idiot. You also didn't catch on because you were too busy trying to suck Robtard's cock that you didn't realize you were falling into "group think". Does Robtard make you swallow?
Originally posted by dadudemonThen how come only you knew what you meant?
No matter how many different ways you put it, you misinterpreted and it was quite clear what was meant.
Originally posted by dadudemonWhat has Robtard being cynical got to do with how you post?
It is grossly stretching to try to derive that I didn't understand his post. In retrospect, you really f***ed up by skipping over the post that acknowledged outright that Robtard was being cynical to my post...oops, you missed that again, didn't you?
Originally posted by dadudemonThat doesn't answer my question.
Riiiiiiiiight. 🙄
Originally posted by dadudemonI hope so.
Thanks for that insight, it was very helpful.
Originally posted by dadudemonO...kay.
Lies. You are too much of an idiot to understand something like that because you misunderstood a certain post of mine. 😉
Originally posted by dadudemonYou were complaining about people being a dick on the internet. How did you not see that? I couldn't have wrote it in a more specific way.
Complaining?...I seem to recall a few posts that were complaining about me being an idiot. I didn't complain...in fact, I even asked you about your "complaining" to try to accommodate you...but that was in fact bating. (Pun intended, bit***s 😉 .)
Originally posted by dadudemonI did that? When?
Also, don't think that I noticed how you treated the word "idiot" as it referenced me. You tried to distance yourself from my being labeled that. You don't want to come off as being such a dick on teh interwebz with me. I don't buy into that bullshit. Call me names directly and don't be a pu**y about it. What can I do? haxor ur internets?
Originally posted by Bardock42And when have I acted a moron?
Woah, **** you, *******. Stop speaking for "us" if you are a complete moron. Which you seem to be. I do not appreciate it. And as far as I know Robtard, he won't either.For the record, dadudemon, you are still an idiot.
Besides, I recall you misread a lot of people's posts and then attack them for not being specific enough.
Originally posted by parenthesis
And when have I acted a moron?
You constantly say "we", referring to me and Robtard and then follow them by inaccurate observations. Stop doing that.
Originally posted by parenthesis
Besides, I recall you misread a lot of people's posts and then attack them for not being specific enough.
W-what?
Originally posted by Bardock42Sorry if they were inaccurate, insulting me like that isn't very acccurate either if that's your only reason...moron.
You constantly say "we", referring to me and Robtard and then follow them by inaccurate observations. Stop doing that.W-what?
In other debates I've seen with you and other members, you always call the other person an idiot even if they're right but say it in an unspecific way. Which is what I'm doing to dadumon now. That and him not realising his post could be misinterperated.
Originally posted by parenthesis
Sorry if they were inaccurate, insulting me like that isn't very acccurate either if that's your only reason...moron.
Actually it is. When someone, like you, says constantly stupid things, evaluates situations in completely wrong ways and on top of that tries to get support from the people he makes look bad with his stupidity...that's a good reason to call someone moron.
Originally posted by parenthesis
In other debates I've seen with you and other members, you always call the other person an idiot even if they're right but say it in an unspecific way. Which is what I'm doing to dadumon now. That and him not realising his post could be misinterperated.
You are wrong. You might think that is what you are doing, but what you are really doing is posting a bunch of nonsense giving him the opportunity to dodge the real shit he said, by debating your stupid points. Please don't compare yourself to me, it makes me nauseous.
Originally posted by parenthesis
How were we supposed to know that?Yeah.
A lot of people would disagree with that. They would argue that you are the idiot for not being clear enough. I've seen Bardock42 use that argument here.
Another point: Try to understand your post was taken another way. Also, you not realising it was taken another way, makes you an idiot.
The ****? Robtard's just another poster, who happens to not like you (which is making me like Robtard) but Devil King is another who said you missed it. Do I suck Devil King's dick now? My opinion is not based off of dick sucking or favouritism, it's based off of my perspective as a new comer into this debate.
Then how come only you knew what you meant?
What has Robtard being cynical got to do with how you post?
That doesn't answer my question.
I hope so.
O...kay.
You were complaining about people being a dick on the internet. How did you not see that? I couldn't have wrote it in a more specific way.
I did that? When?
And when have I acted a moron?
Besides, I recall you misread a lot of people's posts and then attack them for not being specific enough.
ZOMG, you pwnd me. What should I do now?
Originally posted by Robtard
For the record, I do not "dislike" Dadudemon, I do think he post a lot of moronic thoughts in here though.Dadudemon, I see you finally understand the use/meaning in calling someone an "idiot", despite your previous nonsensical rantings about the word. +1 for you.
I don't know if we should knuckle up or if I should punch you in the face with that same fist.... 😕
Originally posted by Bardock42
I do have some distaste for him, not as much as for some others, but nothing a bunch of logical posts couldn't fix. Get at it, ddm.
I will try to take things more seriously on this forum. With school, studying for IT certifications, and two children, I may have trouble taking things more seriously...but I will try. 😉