Democratic Nomination?

Started by lord xyz101 pages

Originally posted by Quark_666
Darn-it. I'm rooting for him too, and if wikipedia is right, that means he's lost support. Looking at ordinary delegates, Obama was easily ahead on super-Tuesday, but I haven't watched closely since. He was only behind if the super-delegates were weighed into the account...and if he doesn't have the ordinary delegates now, he must be loosing support.
Actually hillary won Super Teusday, but Obama was total delagates means super and normal.

As of now though, Obama has won every state since Super Teusday and is ahead of Hillary in Delagates. Yay.

Originally posted by Strangelove
As a subject of the Queen, you are unaffected ermm Not necessarily. It's going to be a brokered convention, and anything can happen there.
I am, remember our special relationship?

Nah, Hillary's losing support, I don't have that much against her, I just think Obama is better.

LOL at Hilary.

YouTube video

For this stupidity, she should be fired.

Obama did the same thing. It's called pandering; both Reps and Dems do it in one form or another.

Someone should have run up there and back-handed her for that though.

Originally posted by Robtard
Obama did the same thing. It's called pandering; both Reps and Dems do it in one form or another.

Someone should have run up there and back-handed her for that though.

I am full aware of that. Bush did it. Obama did it. Did Gore do it? Did Paul do it? But yes, I am aware that everyone does it...she just did it so horribly that it made me gag a little bit. (Of course, Fox news had to be the source for this "coverage".)

Agreed...where were the "Iron my clothes!" people? She IS in the south in that vid.

Originally posted by Robtard
Obama did the same thing. It's called pandering; both Reps and Dems do it in one form or another.

Someone should have run up there and back-handed her for that though.

I did after the cameras went off.

Hillary doesn't believe in God, byebye her campaign.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Hillary doesn't believe in God, byebye her campaign.
ermm

She's a devout Methodist.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Hillary doesn't believe in God, byebye her campaign.

Oh, that's the least of her problems.

Originally posted by Strangelove
ermm

She's a devout Methodist.

I heard a newperson asked her if she believed in god and she said no.

Originally posted by lord xyz
I heard a newperson asked her if she believed in god and she said no.

Do you have a link? I doubt that's true, but if so, I can't imagine she'd ever say it, especially during her campaign.

It's probably just one of those "Hillary-haters" who misinterpret everything she says.

http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/03/all-you-need-is-hate/index.html?ref=opinion

Column on the farce that is Hillary-hating.

Originally posted by Robtard
Do you have a link? I doubt that's true, but if so, I can't imagine she'd ever say it, especially during her campaign.
Originally posted by Strangelove
It's probably just one of those "Hillary-haters" who misinterpret everything she says.
Actually my source is some guy on youtube claiming it, I think he's pro-Hillary.

God these clowns are ridiculous and people that support them are even more ridiculous.

For instance, Obama has a new Global Poverty Act (well it's not really new -- it's passed the Committe and probably will pass the Senate) that will pour almost a trillion bucks into foreign aid until 2015.

Yay! Save the world! WOOO! Looks like cake, but tastes like shit.

Originally posted by BigRed
God these clowns are ridiculous and people that support them are even more ridiculous.

For instance, Obama has a new Global Poverty Act (well it's not really new -- it's passed the Committe and probably will pass the Senate) that will pour almost a trillion bucks into foreign aid until 2015.

Yay! Save the world! WOOO! Looks like cake, but tastes like shit.

Should we spent trillions to destroy it, instead?

(Which is actually a trick question; what's the difference in a global economy?)

Trillions will be spent anyway...and not a dime of it for the actual betterment of the American people. This is how governments work, and have for many years.

Originally posted by Devil King
Should we spent trillions to destroy it, instead?

(Which is actually a trick question; what's the difference in a global economy?)

Trillions will be spent anyway...and not a dime of it for the actual betterment of the American people. This is how governments work, and have for many years.


So we should accept the following facts:

1.) Government is overly large.

2.) Government is incompetent.

3.) Government spends our money wastefully.

And move on? In a way, I wouldn't mind it just so the American people wake up when America falls to her knees, but I don't want to be there when it happens dammit.

[You don't have to be, Canada is to the North; Mexico is to the South.

Originally posted by Robtard
[You don't have to be, Canada is to the North; Mexico is to the South.

Personally, I like America. I like what America stands for.

I don't like the way the American goverment is. And the structure of our government and our constitution allows for me as a "people" to change it.

Originally posted by BigRed
Personally, I like America. I like what America stands for.

I don't like the way the American goverment is. And the structure of our government and our constitution allows for me as a "people" to change it.

America the country is a myth. The true country died in 1980. Today it is completely under the control of corporations. Good luck changing it.

Edwards was the only real hope for change but the corporate controlled media shut his message down pretty effectively.
We are now once again going to be stuck with yet another corporate puppet for President be it McCain, Clinton, or Obama.

Well than I guess you never heard of Ron Paul. He was shut down even more by the media than Edwards.