Originally posted by Alliance
9-11 wasn't ENTIRELY the fault of US foreign policy. Lets not have an isolationist rally now...
Ron Paul for the record, is not an isolationist (seemed like what you were implying). If anything, America is more isolated now with the foreign policy they have if anything.
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove
^You should probably change that sig to Reagan considering how much head the Republican candidates give him.The democrats better not **** up this election because with the exception of Paul, every Republican candidate is going to keep the U.S. in the shithole known as Iraq.
From what we've seen though, the Democrats aren't doing much of well anything to get us out of Iraq. So apparently, Ron Paul (a Republican) is the only true hope to get us out of Iraq as quick as possible and stop our empire building.
Originally posted by Devil King
I agree that Ron Paul is the best candidate on the Republican side, but I wouldn't want him elected over Clinton or Obama.
If you don't mind me asking, why?
Originally posted by Strangelove
I have no reason to doubt that they're inaccurate.And they say that Ron Paul has a dedicated fanbase among Libertarians and Libertarian Republicans. However, Paul has very little crossover appeal. He'll never win the support of the current Republican voting base, and Democrats don't agree with him either.
That's actually not true. He has major crossover appeal. Many democrats from what I've seen and heard are crossing over in droves to vote Republican. I even convinced a worker (a democrat) to vote Ron Paul and she hates Republicans. Many independents of course are latching on to Ron Paul. And I think many old school, TRUE republicans will vote for Ron Paul.
Originally posted by Devil King
I like Ron Paul. I've said that since I first heard him speak. But I have said a number of times that his foreign policy is naive. And even a great number of the people who support him must not be listening to his ideas about the federal government. Bush bankrupted the budget. Bush has expanded the federal bureaucracy. We all get that. But, Paul would like to dismantle a number of federal departments that the citizens of this country have come to depend on.And while I doubt he could pass such legislation as President, I am uncomfortable with the idea that he'd like to.
With all due respect, you must not be listening to Ron Paul then. He realizes people have come to depend on various governmental programs and it isn't high on his priority list to abolish aformentioned governmental programs. But eventually, over time, he would like to phase them out.
Originally posted by Strangelove
I don't like Ron Paul because he (I would assume) follows the ideology of the statement "The government that governs best governs least." And I agree with Devil King, that's just a naive line of thinking, whether in foreign policy or the federal bureaucracy.
So I pressume therefore, you'd rather have more government?
And for someone who suggested the only reason Ron Paul has internet support is because of Alex Jones (joking or not); that is a completely baseless statement.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I wonder how the Tea Party 07 project will turn out. Less than 48 hours now.
Oh it is going to be huge. Trust me on that one. If you want more indepth Ron Paul talk, Facebook is your place if you aren't already joined in that group.